N0018918T0005.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

N0018918T0005 19-Jul-2018

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

757-443-1383

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

11:00 AM 02 Aug 2018

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

N001899. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

SHANNON DAVIS

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

N6268818RC024FN

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

NAVSUP FLC NORFOLK CONTRACTING

NORFOLK OFFICE

ATTN: SHANNON DAVIS

1968 GILBERT STREET STE 600

NORFOLK VA 23511-3331

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE N62688 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

COMMANDER NAVY REGION MID-LANT

J. LEWIS

1510 GILBERT STREET

NORFOLK VA 23511-2737

TEL: 757-322-2795 FAX:

757-443-1424FAX:

TEL: 757-443-1383

SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

X 8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$38,500,000

NAICS:

488310

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF70

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

N0018918T0005

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

INSTRUCTIONS TO QUOTERS

The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) definite-delivery definite-quantity contract as a result of this solicitation in accordance with FAR Subpart 13.5. Award will be made to the vendor whose quote is most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in the solicitation. The Government intends to evaluate quotes and award a contract based on initial quotes. Therefore, the initial quote should contain the quoter’s best terms from a technical, past performance and a price standpoint. The Government reserves the right to award a firm fixed price contract to other than the lowest priced quoter; award a firm fixed priced contract without discussions; or award a firm fixed priced contract after discussions, whichever is in the best interest of the

Government.

The Government intends to award a FFP definite-delivery definite-quantity contract to the responsible quoter whose quote represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation by utilizing the trade-off process. The quote shall be in the form prescribed by, and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the Instructions to Quoters section of the solicitation.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSIONS OF QUOTES:

1) Quoters shall respond to all requirements of the solicitation document. Quoters are cautioned not to alter the solicitation. Hand-carried quotes are not authorized and will not be accepted. Each page of each copy shall be affixed with the following legend:

Source Selection Information

See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

2) In event any person who is not a bona fide employee of the quoter participated in the creation, formulation or writing of any portion of the quote, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the quote which shall be signed by an officer of the quoter. Such certificates shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person’s employment capacity, the name of the person’s firm, the relationship of that firm to the quoter, and the portion of the quote in which the person participated.

3) QUESTIONS: In order to ensure that all questions submitted by potential quoters are answered prior to the solicitation closing date, questions concerning the solicitation should be submitted via email to Shannon

Davis at shannon.davis@navy.mil NO LATER THAN 11:00 AM EST 26 JUL 2018. The Government reserves the right not to respond to any questions received concerning this solicitation after the questions receipt date above. Accordingly, quoters are encouraged to carefully review all solicitation requirements and submit questions to the Government as early as possible.

4) Quotes shall be submitted via email to Shannon Davis at shannon.davis@navy.mil no later than 11:00 AM

EST 02 AUG 2018. Quoters shall comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the quotes contained herein; quotes that do not comply may be considered unacceptable and may render the quote ineligible for award.

5) All submission and attachments shall be in Microsoft compatible format. Submissions are page limited to the maximum number of pages as defined below. These page limitations are inclusive of the executive summary and any charts, diagrams, and/or other graphics. Graphics (including tables) in the quote may use an alternative font with 8-point size type or larger. Each “page” is defined as one sheet, 8 ½ “x 11”, with at least one inch margins on all sides, using a font with a point size of 12 or greater (e.g., "Times New

Roman" style with 12-point font). Lines shall, at a minimum, be single-spaced. Pages shall be consecutively numbered. Multiple pages, double pages, two-sided pages, or foldouts will count as an equivalent number of 8 ½" x 11" pages. The quoter is permitted to submit no more than one page for each of the following, which will not be included in the page count: a cover sheet, list of tables, list of figures, mailto:shannon.davis@navy.mil compliance matrix, table of contents, tabs, and dividers. Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations described within will not be evaluated.

QUOTE CONTENT

(1) Introduction and Purpose: This section specifies the format that quoter shall use in this RFQ. The intent is not to restrict the quoters in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the responses for evaluation purposes.

(2) Each attachment should contain the following items in addition to the other information required by this solicitation:

Cover: The cover should indicate the following:

Title of the Quote

Volume Number (I, II, or III)

RFQ Number

Name and address of quoter, Cage Code, DUNS and applicable Tax I.D. Number (TIN)

Quote validity period for 180 days from solicitation closing

Table of Contents: The table of contents should provide sufficient detail as to allow the important elements to be easily located.

(3) Requirements for Style: Each quoter shall submit a quote that clearly and concisely describes and defines the contractor’s response to the requirements contained in the RFQ. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective quote are not desired.

(4) Quote Page Limitations:

Title Quote Quantities Page Limit

Volume I: Factor I –Security Clearance 1 Electronic Submission 10 Pages

Volume I: Factor II – Staffing Approach 1 Electronic Submission 20 Pages

Volume II: Factor III – Past Performance 1 Electronic Submission 15 Pages

Volume III: Factor IV - Price Quote 1 Electronic Submission No Limit

Each volume is limited to the maximum number of pages as defined in the table above. These page limitations are inclusive of the executive summary and any charts, diagrams, and/or other graphics. Graphics (including tables) in the quote may use an alternative font with 8-point size type or larger. Each “page” is defined as one sheet, 8 ½ x 11 inches, with at least one inch margins on all sides, using a font with a point size of 10 or greater (e.g., Times New

Roman style with 10-point font). Lines shall, at a minimum, be single-spaced. Pages shall be consecutively numbered. Multiple pages, double pages, two-sided pages, or foldouts will count as an equivalent number of 8 ½ x

11 inch pages. Quoters are permitted to submit no more than one page for each of the following which will not be included in the page count: a cover sheet, list of tables, list of figures, tabs, and dividers. Tables of contents and any compliance matrices may exceed one page, which will not be included in the page count. Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations described above will not be evaluated.

Volume I: Technical

Factor I – Security Clearance

The quoter must possess the facility security clearance at the time of award. Quoter must possess at least an interim

Security Clearance at time of award.

Quoters should also demonstrate the ability to enroll in Defense Biometric ID System (DBIS) to obtain access to the installation without the need for daily base passes. Periodic background screenings are conducted to verify continued DBIS participation and installation access privileges. Any time invested or price(s) paid for obtaining

DBIS credentials will not be reimbursed or approved as a direct cost by the Department of the Navy.

The Security Clearance submission is limited to 10 pages.

Factor II –Staffing Approach

The quoter shall provide a detailed chart outlining how it intends to staff this effort – by name, position and a brief summary of duties and responsibilities. Included in this plan shall be a brief summary of management responsibilities and how on-site personnel shall be able to respond to issues and communicate with senior contractor personnel if necessary to obtain requisite answers or authority.

Personnel Resumes:

The section shall include a list of the key personnel whom the quoter proposes to assign to the contract. The key personnel are:

Project Manager

Alternate Project Manager (required during the primary project manager’s absence)

The Navy will rate the quality of personnel proposed for the key positions IAW Section 3.8.4 Crew Qualifications in the PWS. Quality of the personnel proposed will be determined by the Navy’s evaluation of resumes submitted in terms of the merit of the individual’s qualifications and any relevant information obtained from review of

Government Past Performance reports. This information will be compared to solicitation requirements.

If the proposed employee is not a current employee of the quoter, a letter of intent shall be attached to the resume.

Failure to confirm employment status/employment intent will preclude further consideration and result in an assignment of an “Unacceptable” rating for this factor.

Resumes shall provide the following information:

Name

Present place of employment (if a contingent hire, please note)

Security Clearance

Proposed labor category

Experience and educational background

Unique skills, specific experience and accomplishments that are directly applicable to the PWS

Proposed application of the individual to the contract effort (i.e. full time or part time)

The Staffing Approach submission is limited to 20 pages.

Volume II: Past Performance

Factor III – Past Performance

In order to facilitate the Government’s evaluation of this factor, the quoter shall provide information on no more than three (3) previous contracts whose effort was relevant to the effort required by this solicitation; the contracts provided should have been performed within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

Evaluation will focus only on work experience already performed. Yet-to-be performed work and experience prior to the last five (5) years will not be considered. Quoters may submit performance data regarding current contract performance as long as a minimum of one year of performance has been completed as of the closing date of this

RFQ. The Government may contact some or all of the references provided, as appropriate, and may collect information through questionnaires, telephone interviews and existing data sources to include but not limited to

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting (CPARS). The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

This past performance information will be used for the evaluation of past performance. The following minimum information shall be provided within the contractor submitted references:

• Name of Quoter

• Contract Number/Task Order Number

• Contract Type

• Annual Contract/Task Order Cost

• Description of Work - Quoters should provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts in terms of scope and magnitude to the requirements of the RFQ for purposes of relevancy.

• Valid Name, Phone Number and E-mail Address of Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer's

Representative/Task Order Manager

• Annual Contract Cost and Total Contract Cost

• Period of Performance

• Number of Personnel (FTE) performing per year (average)

For purposes of this solicitation, a contract is defined as a single contract or a single task order placed under an

Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract, a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), or a Federal Supply

Schedule. Additionally, quoters may submit, as part of its (up to) three (3) past performance contracts, a combination of up to three (3) delivery orders (DOs), task orders (TOs), technical direction letters (TDLs), and/or technical area tasks (TATs) placed under an ID/IQ or BPA. Such a combination of DOs, TOs, TDLs and or TATs must also meet the requirements stated above: each individual example in the combination must demonstrate at least one (1) year of completed performance and have been performed within five (5) years of the solicitation issuance date.

Quoters may provide contracts describing their own experience as a subcontractor. Quoters shall describe the major or critical aspects of the work performed, as well as the dollar value of work performed, under the submitted contract.

Quoters may also submit contracts of subcontractors they propose to use under this contract. Quoters shall describe the major or critical aspects of the work subcontractors are proposed to perform under the contract. Quoters shall also describe the major or critical aspects of the work performed by the subcontractor, as well as the dollar value of work performed, under the submitted contract.

Subcontractor performance (either the quoter’s own subcontractor experience or proposed subcontractors experience) of major or critical aspects of this requirement will be considered as highly as prime contractor past performance information for the quoters.

The quoter shall demonstrate relevant and completed past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance. Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts within the past five years prior to the solicitation closing date that is the same as or similar to, the scope and magnitude of the work described by this solicitation.

Additionally, the Government requests the quoters provide Attachment 2, Past Performance Report Form (PPRF) to each point of contact (POC) identified and submitted as Past Performance information. The PPRF shall be emailed directly from the quoter’s POC to the NAVSUP FLC contracting department POC Shannon Davis at shannon.davis@navy.mil by the due date and time of this request for quote. The Government reserves the right to consider past performance report forms received after the due date of the solicitation and to contact references for verification or additional information.

The Past Performance submission is limited to 15 pages.

Volume III: Price

Factor IV – Price

This volume shall include completed solicitation documents and additional supporting documentation described below:

- RFQ Section “Schedule of Supplies/Services” completed by the quoter with the total base and option contract prices inclusive of the 6-month option period;

- Separate pricing information shall be submitted for each year of the services, including 6-month option period

(FAR 52.217-8) as well as a total summary for all years of service;

- Unless completed in System for Award Management (SAM), “Representations, Certifications and Other

Statements of Quoters” certification completed by the quoter;

- All supplemental information to support the proposed price including labor mix and level of effort (LOE) and fully burdened per hour labor rates, to include subcontractor’s supplemental pricing information in the same format;

- A completed and signed page 1 of the most current version of the solicitation and any amendments if applicable;

- For the purposes of the quote, all rates should be proposed at the Government site;

- The quote shall be valid for 180 days from solicitation closing date;

- For the purpose of preparing a price quote, the contractor shall assume that the basic period of performance will be one (1) 6-month base period, four (4) 12-month option periods, and one (1) 6-month option period.

The completion and submission of the above items will constitute a quote and will indicate the quoter’s unconditional assent to the terms and conditions of this RFQ and any attachments and/or exhibits hereto. All price and price supporting information shall be contained in the price quote. No price or pricing information shall be included in any other volume including cover letters. Quoters are responsible for submitting sufficient information to enable the Government to fully evaluate their price quote.

The Price submission is not page limited, but is strictly limited to price information.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Priced (FFP) contract to the responsible quoter whose quote represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation by utilizing the trade-off process. The quote shall be in the form prescribed by, and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the Instructions to Quoters section of the solicitation. The Government intends to evaluate quotes and award the task order upon initial quotes. Therefore, the initial quote should contain the quoter’s best terms from a technical, past performance, and price standpoint.

The evaluation of quotes will be conducted in two phases.

Phase I will consist of evaluation of Factor I – Security Clearance. Quotes receiving a rating of ‘Unacceptable’ for

Factor I – Security Clearance are considered un-awardable and will not be further evaluated. Quoters rated as

"Acceptable” in Phase I shall be ordered according to price, inclusive of all option pricing, from lowest to highest and will progress to Phase II of the evaluation. A quoter’s proposed prices will be determined by adding all extended amounts for the CLINs in Section B.

Phase II will consist of evaluation of Factor II –Staffing Approach, Factor III – Past Performance and Factor IV –

Price. Within the Non-Price quote, Staffing Approach and Past Performance will be weighted equally. The evaluation of quotes will consider Staffing Approach and Past Performance combined to be more important than

Price.

If the lowest priced quote is evaluated to have a Staffing Approach rated as ‘Outstanding’ AND an overall Past

Performance Confidence Assessment rating of ‘Substantial Confidence’, that quote represents the best value for the

Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that quoter without further consideration of any other quotes. However, if the lowest priced quote is not evaluated to have a Staffing Approach rated as ‘Outstanding’ AND a ‘Substantial Confidence’ Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating, the next-lowest priced quote will be evaluated. The evaluation process will continue (in order of price from lowest to highest) until a quote is evaluated to have a Staffing Approach rated as ‘Outstanding’ AND a ‘Substantial

Confidence’ Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating. The Government shall then make and integrated best-value award decision between the quote rated with a Staffing Approach rated as ‘Outstanding’ AND a

‘Substantial Confidence’ Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating and all lower priced awardable quotes. If no quotes are rated with a Staffing Approach of ‘Outstanding’ AND a ‘Substantial Confidence’ Past Performance

Confidence Assessment, the Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best-value award decision from among the awardable quotes.

PHASE I

Factor I – Security Clearance: Factor I will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the Technical

Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings table below. The quoter will be evaluated on: the accuracy, completeness and feasibility of its response to Section L. The purpose of this Factor is to assess the quoter’s proposed validator candidates’ commitment and qualifications to satisfy the Government’s requirements.

Table 1 –Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Table

Technical Rating Description

Acceptable Quote meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Quote does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

PHASE II

Phase II will consist of evaluation of Factor II –Staffing Approach, Factor III – Past Performance and Factor IV –

Price.

Factor II –Staffing Approach:

The quoter shall submit documentation describing their approach to ensuring the staffing capabilities and key personnel qualifications as required in the PWS. The table below entitled “Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Table” will be utilized for the assignment of ratings for Factor II. The quoter will be evaluated on: the accuracy, completeness and feasibility of its response to Section L. The purpose of this Factor is to assess the quoter’s proposed approach to satisfy the Government’s requirements.

The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations will utilize the combined technical/risk ratings from the Technical Rating Table below.

Table 2 – Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Table

Technical Rating Description

Outstanding Quote indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good

Quote indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Quote meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Quote has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable

Quote does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Quote is un-awardable.

Definitions:

Strength is an aspect of a quoter’s quote that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness means a flaw in the quote that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness in the quote is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency is a material failure of a quote to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a quote that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an quoter’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

NOTE: A rating of “Marginal” for Factor II means that the quote is not awardable without a change or changes to the quote. A quote which includes a “Marginal” rating is not eligible for award if award is made on initial quotes.

Quoters that receive a “Marginal” rating are considered to be susceptible to correction if the Source Selection

Authority determines that an exchange (pursuant to FAR 15.306) is appropriate and said exchange is conducted.

A rating of “Unacceptable” for Factor II means that the quoter’s quote is not awardable and will not be further evaluated.

Quoters simply providing general statements or paraphrasing/parroting the PWS in whole or in any part shall be rated unacceptable.

Factor III - Past Performance:

The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an quoter’s ability to meet the contract’s requirements based on the quality of a demonstrated record of recent and relevant performance. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. These are combined to establish a single performance confidence assessment rating for each quoter.

Past Performance Recency: Recency is the first aspect of the past performance evaluation and is the time period during which past performance references are considered relevant. Recency is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. For purposes of this solicitation, recent past performance is performance that has taken place within five (5) years as of the closing date of this solicitation. Performance outside of this stated period will not be considered for evaluation purposes.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Relevancy is the second aspect of the past performance evaluation and the Government will assess each past performance reference under each quoter’s Past Performance submission to determine scope and magnitude relative to this requirement. The following definitions will apply to this evaluation:

• Scope: The measure of the similarity of the scope of the PWS and the quoter’s contracts. The PWS scope meets the majority of the objectives as defined in the solicitation.

• Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the dollar value of actually performed work that exists between the PWS and the quoter’s references. Magnitude will be evaluated on the dollar amount of work actually performed under the contract or contracts during the relevant five-year period established by this solicitation.

The relevancy rating assigned to each past performance reference will be considered in determining the weight to be given to that reference in the overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment. The quality of performance under a past performance reference that that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be considered in the overall assessment of past performance confidence. In determining the rating for the past performance factor, past performance of greater relevancy will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

The Past Performance Relevancy Ratings are listed in Table 3 – Past Performance Relevancy Rating Table below:

Table 3 – Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Table

Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Quality: The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the quoter’s past performance. The Government will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the quoter’s performance, including general trends and usefulness of the information, and will incorporate this into the past performance confidence assessment.

Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Next, the overall assigned rating for Past Performance will be the Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating.

The assignment of this rating will be based on the quality of the relevant past performance and will also consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance. The quality of performance under a past performance reference that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be considered in the overall assessment of Past Performance Confidence. This evaluation and rating is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the quoter’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the quoter and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the RFQ. In determining the rating for the past performance evaluation factor, the Government will give greater consideration to the contracts which the

Government feels are most relevant to the RFQ. The Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings are detailed in the table as follows:

Table 4 – Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Table

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of quoters for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance information is not available, the quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the past performance factor. In this case, the quoter’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence.” Although an quoter that lacks recent, relevant past performance may not be rated favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine that a “Substantial

Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating provides better value to the Government than a

“Neutral Confidence” past performance rating.

In order to determine the quality of performance, the Government may utilize existing data sources, including the

Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS), the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), the Electronic Subcontract

Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; communication with points of contact in the quoter’s customer’s organization, which could include private sector requirements and contracts personnel, Administrative Contracting

Officers, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) personnel, Procuring Contracting Officers, Contracting

Officer’s Representatives, and other Government activity requirements personnel. The Government may verify past performance information. The Government may contact some or all of the references provided, as appropriate, and may collect information through questionnaires, telephone interviews, and existing data sources. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources, including sources outside of the Government. This information will be used for the evaluation of past performance.

Factor IV – Price:

Price will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-3. For the purpose of preparing a price quote, the contractor shall assume that the basic period of performance will be one (1) 6-month base period with four (4) 12-month option periods inclusive of one (1) 6-month option period (FAR Clause 52.217-8). The Government will evaluate the price quote for the base year, each 12-month option period, and the 6-month option period (FAR 52.217-8).

Options, to include FAR 52.217-8, will be evaluated pursuant to solicitation provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of

Options. The Government will evaluate quotes for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that a quote is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Prices will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness.

The Government may evaluate any and all information submitted by the quoter to support the reasonableness of prices proposed. The method of evaluation used by the Contracting Officer is solely within the discretion of the

Contracting Officer. Additionally, the government may request quoters to submit additional information/data to support price reasonableness such as copies of paid invoices for the same or similar items or uncertified cost and pricing data. Failure to submit the requested information may result in disqualification of the submitted quote.

A written notice of award or acceptance of a quote e-mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful quoter within the time for acceptance specified in the quote shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Although price is the not the most important evaluation factor, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the quotes in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based. The importance of price will also increase when a quote's price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might be gained under the other aspects of the quote. If, at any stage of the evaluation, all quoters are determined to have submitted equal, or virtually equal, non-price quotes, price could become the factor in determining which quoters shall receive the award.

Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 6 Months

SECURITY BARRIERS

FFP

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-SMALL CRAFT BARRIER

(ASCB) SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED PERFORMANCE

WORK STATEMENT

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: N6268818RC024FN

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N6268818RC024FN

SIGNAL CODE: J

NET AMT

1001 12 Months

OPTION SECURITY BARRIERS

FFP

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-SMALL CRAFT BARRIER

(ASCB) SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED PERFORMANCE

WORK STATEMENT

FOB: Destination

2001 12 Months

OPTION SECURITY BARRIERS

FFP

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-SMALL CRAFT BARRIER

(ASCB) SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED PERFORMANCE

WORK STATEMENT

3001 12 Months

OPTION SECURITY BARRIERS

FFP

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-SMALL CRAFT BARRIER

(ASCB) SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED PERFORMANCE

WORK STATEMENT

4001 12 Months

OPTION SECURITY BARRIERS

FFP

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-SMALL CRAFT BARRIER

(ASCB) SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED PERFORMANCE

WORK STATEMENT

5001 6 Months

OPTION SIX MONTH OPTION

FFP

PRICE IS BASED ON FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OF THE QUOTED PRICE OF

THE LAST OPTION YEAR IAW FAR 52.217-8 OPTION TO EXTEND

SERVICES

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

1001 Destination Government Destination Government

2001 Destination Government Destination Government

3001 Destination Government Destination Government

4001 Destination Government Destination Government

5001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 01-SEP-2018 TO

28-FEB-2019

N/A COMMANDER NAVY REGION MID-LANT

J. LEWIS

1510 GILBERT STREET

NORFOLK VA 23511-2737

757-322-2795

N62688

1001 POP 01-MAR-2019 TO

29-FEB-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 01-MAR-2020 TO

28-FEB-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 01-MAR-2021 TO

28-FEB-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 01-MAR-2022 TO

28-FEB-2023

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

5001 POP 01-MAR-2023 TO

31-AUG-2023

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-18 Prohibition on Contracting With Entities That Require Certain

Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements--

Representation

JAN 2017

52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2016

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items JAN 2017

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards MAY 2014

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.237-1 Site Visit APR 1984

52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992

252.204-7005 Oral Attestation of Security Responsibilities NOV 2001

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation

Support

MAY 2016

252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991

252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of

Terrorism

OCT 2015

252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or

Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor

Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013

252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea APR 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-21 BASIC SAFEGUARDING OF COVERED CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JUN 2016)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Covered contractor information system means an information system that is owned or operated by a contractor that processes, stores, or transmits Federal contract information.

Federal contract information means information, not intended for public release, that is provided by or generated for the Government under a contract to develop or deliver a product or service to the Government, but not including information provided by the Government to the public (such as on public Web sites) or simple transactional information, such as necessary to process payments.

Information means any communication or representation of knowledge such as facts, data, or opinions, in any medium or form, including textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual (Committee on

National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 4009).

Information system means a discrete set of information resources organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of information (44 U.S.C. 3502).

Safeguarding means measures or controls that are prescribed to protect information systems.

(b) Safeguarding requirements and procedures.

(1) The Contractor shall apply the following basic safeguarding requirements and procedures to protect covered contractor information systems. Requirements and procedures for basic safeguarding of covered contractor information systems shall include, at a minimum, the following security controls:

(i) Limit information system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, or devices

(including other information systems).

(ii) Limit information system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute.

(iii) Verify and control/limit connections to and use of external information systems.

(iv) Control information posted or processed on publicly accessible information systems.

(v) Identify information system users, processes acting on behalf of users, or devices.

(vi) Authenticate (or verify) the identities of those users, processes, or devices, as a prerequisite to allowing access to organizational information systems.

(vii) Sanitize or destroy information system media containing Federal Contract Information before disposal or release for reuse.

(viii) Limit physical access to organizational information systems, equipment, and the respective operating environments to authorized individuals.

(ix) Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity; maintain audit logs of physical access; and control and manage physical access devices.

(x) Monitor, control, and protect organizational communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational information systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of the information systems.

(xi) Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are physically or logically separated from internal networks.

(xii) Identify, report, and correct information and information system flaws in a timely manner.

(xiii) Provide protection from malicious code at appropriate locations within organizational information systems.

(xiv) Update malicious code protection mechanisms when new releases are available.

(xv) Perform periodic scans of the information system and real-time scans of files from external sources as files are downloaded, opened, or executed.

(2) Other requirements. This clause does not relieve the Contractor of any other specific safeguarding requirements specified by Federal agencies and departments relating to covered contractor information systems generally or other

Federal safeguarding requirements for controlled unclassified information (CUI) as established by Executive Order

13556.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in subcontracts under this contract (including subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items, other than commercially available off-the-shelf items), in which the subcontractor may have Federal contract information residing in or transiting through its information system.

(End of clause)

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JULY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian

Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a

Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than

$10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the

Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post…