NWPT_Contract_Attachment_2_QASP.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0018918QG044
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachments_Clauses_18_and_11and__52_Service_Contract_Act_exception.docx | DOCX document | |
| Copy_of_NEWPORT_CCTV_INVERNTORY_2017.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N00189-18-Q-G044_RFQ_Newport_1-24-18.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
Closed Circuit Television Maintenance Services in support of Unaccompanied Housing at NAVST Newport, RI
Purpose: To ensure that the Government has an effective and systematic method of surveillance for the services in the PWS. The QASP will be used primarily as a tool to verify that the contractor is performing all services required by the PWS in a timely, accurate and complete fashion.
1. Critical performance processes and requirements. Critical to the performance of CCTV maintenance services in support of NAVST Newport’s Unaccompanied Housing is the timely, accurate, and thorough completion of all contract requirements.
2. Performance Standards
a. Schedule: The due dates for deliverables and the actual accomplishment of the schedule will be assessed against original due dates and milestones established for the contract.
b. Deliverables: The deliverables required to be submitted will be assessed against the specifications for the deliverables detailed in the contract for the required content, quality, timeliness, and accuracy.
c. Past Performance - In addition to any schedule and deliverables aspects of performance discussed above, pursuant to FAR 42.15, the Government will assess the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship, the contractor’s adherence to contract schedules including the administrative aspects of performance, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer.
3. Surveillance methods: The primary methods of surveillance used to monitor performance of this contract will include, but not be limited to, random or planned sampling, periodic inspection, and validated customer complaints.
4. Performance Measurement: Performance will be measured in accordance with the following table:
| Deliverable or Service Requirement |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Assessment Method and Frequency |
| The vendor shall correct unsatisfactory preventive maintenance services by the next business day of notification by the COR. (PWS Paragraph 2.1) |
| Service to be provided timely and accurately |
| 95% timeliness |
| Customer feedback and random inspections of completed work |
| The vendor shall be on site no later than 24 hours after notification of emergent service requirements. (PWS Paragraph 2.1 and 2.2) |
| Service to be provided timely and accurately |
| 95% timeliness |
| Random customer feedback |
| The vendor shall complete service calls and have system back to full operational condition within three calendar days after notification. (PWS Paragraph 2.2) |
| Service to be provided timely and accurately |
| 95% timeliness |
| Customer feedback and random inspections of completed work |
| Delays in returning system to full operational condition shall be reported to the COR with any proposed temporary action to be approved prior to implementation. (PWS Paragraph 2.2) |
| Service to be provided timely and accurately |
| 95% timeliness |
| Random as reported to the COR |
| Vendor shall provide a quarterly equipment inventory list update report to the COR by the fifth business day following quarter’s end. (PWS Paragraph 7.1) |
| Reported submitted timely and accurately |
| 95% timeliness |
| Quarterly submission; review by COR |
| Vendor shall provide a monthly and a quarterly maintenance and repair report to the COR by the fifth business day of the month. (PWS Paragraph 7.2) |
| Reported submitted timely and accurately |
| 95% timeliness |
| Monthly submission; review by COR |
If performance is within acceptable levels, it will be considered to be satisfactory. If not, overall performance may be considered unsatisfactory.
Incentives/Disincentives:
The COR makes an annual report on Contractor Performance (CPARS or other annual report). The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts. The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract may result in the non-exercise of available options.
For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the contractor. The contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.
In accordance with the inspection of services provisions of the contract, the contractor will be incentivized to provide quality products in a timely manner since the Government can require the Contractor, at no additional cost, to replace or correct work that fails to meet contract requirements.
File details come from the government source that posted it.