Amendment_0001.pdf

N3335518RC005FN

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment: See SF 30 - Block 14, Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 22

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0018918Q0401

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Aug-2018

CODE

NAVSUP FLC NORFOLK CONTRACTING

NORFOLK OFFICE

ATTN: J. MASON

1968 GILBERT ST, SUITE 600

NORFOLK VA 23511-3392

N00189 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0018918Q0401

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The contract maximum amount has decreased by $300,000.00 from $500,000.00 to $200,000.00.

The contract minimum amount has decreased by $179,372.00 from $189,372.00 to $10,000.00.

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contract to the responsible offeror whose quote represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation by utilizing the trade-off process. The offeror’s quote shall be in the form prescribed by, and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the Instructions to Offerors section of the solicitation. The

Government intends to evaluate quotes and award the contract upon initial quotes. Therefore, the offeror’s initial quote should contain the offeror’s best terms from a past performance and price standpoint.

The evaluation of quotes will be conducted in two phases after placing all offers in order of lowest price to highest.

Phase I will consist of evaluation of Factor I – Past Performance. During phase I, the evaluation will consider past performance. Factor I – Past Performance. Phase II will consist of the evaluation of Factor II, Price. During Phase II, the evaluation of quotes will consider Factor II – Price. Factor I – Past performance will be more important that

Factor II –Price.

If the lowest priced quote is evaluated to have a Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating of ‘Substantial

Confidence’, that quote represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that quoter without further consideration of any other quotes. However, if the lowest priced quote is not “Substantial Confidence” Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating, the next-lowest priced quote will be evaluated. The evaluation process will continue in order of price from lowest to highest until a quote is evaluated to have a “Substantial Confidence” Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating. The

Government shall then make and integrated best-value award decision between the quote rated with a “Substantial

Confidence” Past Performance Confidence assessment rating and all lower priced awardable quotes. If no quotes are rated with a “Substantial Confidence” Past Performance Confidence Assessment, the Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best-value award decision from among the awardable quotes.

PHASE I

The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an quoter’s ability to meet the contract’s requirements based on the quality of a demonstrated record of recent and relevant performance. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. These are combined to establish a single performance confidence assessment rating for each quoter.

Past Performance Recency: Recency is the first aspect of the past performance evaluation and is the time period during which past performance references are considered relevant. Recency is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. For purposes of this solicitation, recent past performance is performance that has taken place within five (5) years as of the closing date of this solicitation. Performance outside of this stated period will not be considered for evaluation purposes.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

First, the Government will assess each past performance reference under each quoter’s Past Performance submission to determine scope and magnitude relative to this requirement. The following definitions will apply to this evaluation:

• Scope: The measure of the similarity of the scope of the PWS and the quoter’s contracts. The PWS scope meets the majority of the objectives as defined in the solicitation.

• Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the dollar value of actually performed work that exists between the PWS and the quoter’s references. Magnitude will be evaluated on the dollar amount of work actually performed under the contract or contracts during the relevant five-year period established by this solicitation.

The relevancy rating assigned to each past performance reference will be considered in determining the weight to be given to that reference in the overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment. The quality of performance under a past performance reference that that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be considered in the overall assessment of past performance confidence. In determining the rating for the past performance factor, past performance of greater relevancy will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. The Past Performance Relevancy Ratings are listed in Table 3 – Past Performance

Relevancy Rating Table below:

Table 3 – Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Table

Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Somewhat

Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Quality: The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the quoter’s past performance. The Government will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the quoter’s performance, including general trends and usefulness of the information, and will incorporate this into the past performance confidence assessment.

Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Next, the overall assigned rating for Past Performance will be the Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating.

The assignment of this rating will be based on the quality of the relevant past performance and will also consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance. The quality of performance under a past performance reference that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be considered in the overall assessment of Past Performance Confidence. This evaluation and rating is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the quoter’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the quoter and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the RFQ. In determining the rating for the past performance evaluation factor, the Government will give greater consideration to the contracts which the

Government feels are most relevant to the RFQ. The Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings are detailed in the table as follows:

Table 4 – Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Table

Adjectival

Rating Description

Substantial

Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory

Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral

Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited

Confidence

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of quoters for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance information is not available, the quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the past performance factor. In this case, the quoter’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence.” Although an quoter that lacks recent, relevant past performance may not be rated favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine that a “Substantial

Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating provides better value to the Government than a

“Neutral Confidence” past performance rating.

In order to determine the quality of performance, the Government may utilize existing data sources, including the

Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS), the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), the Electronic Subcontract

Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; communication with points of contact in the quoter’s customer’s organization, which could include private sector requirements and contracts personnel, Administrative Contracting

Officers, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) personnel, Procuring Contracting Officers, Contracting

Officer’s Representatives, and other Government activity requirements personnel. The Government may verify past performance information. The Government may contact some or all of the references provided, as appropriate, and may collect information through questionnaires, telephone interviews, and existing data sources. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources, including sources outside of the Government. This information will be used for the evaluation of past performance.

PHASE II

Price will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-3. For the purpose of preparing a price quote, the contractor shall assume that the basic period of performance will be for (1) 12- month base year, an ordering period, and the 6-month option period (FAR 52.217-8). The Government will evaluate the price quote for 12- month base period, an ordering period, and the 6-month option period (FAR 52.217-8).

Options, to include FAR 52.217-8, will be evaluated pursuant to solicitation provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of

Options. The Government will evaluate quotes for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that a quote is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Prices will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness.

The Government may evaluate any and all information submitted by the quoter to support the reasonableness of prices proposed. The method of evaluation used by the Contracting Officer is solely within the discretion of the

Contracting Officer. Additionally, the government may request quoters to submit additional information/data to support price reasonableness such as copies of paid invoices for the same or similar items or uncertified cost and pricing data. Failure to submit the requested information may result in disqualification of the submitted quote.

A written notice of award or acceptance of a quote e-mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful quoter within the time for acceptance specified in the quote shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Although price is the not the most important evaluation factor, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the quotes in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based. The importance of price will also increase when a quote's price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might be gained under the other aspects of the quote. If, at any stage of the evaluation, all quoters are determined to have submitted equal, or virtually equal, non-price quotes, price could become the factor in determining which quoters shall receive the award.

52.216-19 ORDER LIMITATIONS (OCT 1995)

(a) Minimum order. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than $1.00 (insert dollar figure or quantity), the Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.

(b) Maximum order. The Contractor is not obligated to honor -

(1) Any order for a single item in excess of $200,000.00 (insert dollar figure or quantity);

(2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of $200,000.00 (insert dollar figure or quantity); or

(3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within 1 day that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in paragraph (b) (1) or (2) of this section.

(c) If this is a requirements contract (i.e., includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-21 of the Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR)), the Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the

Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.

(d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within 1 day after issuance, with written notice stating the Contractor's intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.

(End of clause)

252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

Document type means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area

WorkFlow (WAWF).

Local processing office (LPO) is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall--

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.acquisition.gov; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this Web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training

Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through

WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via Web entry, Electronic Data

Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type(s).

2 –IN-1

(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in

WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.

Not applicable

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table*

Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF

Pay Official DoDAAC Entered at time of Award

Issue By DoDAAC ____

Admin DoDAAC ____

Inspect By DoDAAC ____

Ship To Code ____

Ship From Code ____

Mark For Code ____

Service Approver (DoDAAC) ____

Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) ____

Accept at Other DoDAAC ____

LPO DoDAAC ____

DCAA Auditor DoDAAC ____

Other DoDAAC(s) ____

(*Contracting Officer: Insert applicable DoDAAC information or “See schedule” if multiple ship to/acceptance locations apply, or “Not applicable.”)

(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.

(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the email address identified below in the “Send

Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.

(Contracting Officer: Insert applicable email addresses or “Not applicable.”)

(g) WAWF point of contact. (1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity's WAWF point of contact.

(Contracting Officer: Insert applicable information or “Not applicable.”)

(2) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.

(End of clause)

TECHNICAL DIRECTION

(a) When necessary, technical direction or clarification concerning the details of specific tasks set forth in the contract shall be given through issuance of Technical Direction Letters (TDLs) by the Contracting Officer's

Representative (COR) after review and approval by the contracting officer (CO)

(b) Each TDL shall be in writing and shall include, as a minimum, the following information:

(1) Date of TDL;

(2) Contract and TDL number;

(3) Reference to the relevant section or item in the performance work statement (PWS)/statement of work(SOW);

(4) TDL period of performance:

(5) Printed name and contact information of the COR and the PCO/ACO;

(6) Signatures with dates of the COR and PCO/ACO.

(c) Each TDL issued hereunder is subject to the terms and conditions of this contract; and in no event shall technical directions constitute an assignment of new work or changes of such nature as to justify any adjustment to the fixed fee, estimated costs, or delivery terms under the contract. In the event of a conflict between a TDL and this contract, the contract shall control.

(d) When in the opinion of the Contractor a technical direction calls for effort outside the contract PWS/SOW, the

Contractor shall notify the COR and Contracting Officer thereof in writing within two working days of having received the technical direction in question. The Contractor shall undertake no performance to comply with the technical direction until the matter has been resolved by the Contracting Officer through formal contract modification or other appropriate action.

(e) Oral technical directions may be given by the COR only for emergency repairs as defined in the Performance

Work Statement, and provided that any oral technical direction given is reduced to writing by the COR within two working days of its issuance.

(f) Amendments to a TDL shall be in writing and shall include the information set forth in paragraph (b) above. A

TDL may be amended orally only by the PCO in emergencies; oral amendments shall be confirmed in writing within two working days from the time of the oral communication amending the TDL by a TDL modification.

(g) Any effort undertaken by the Contractor pursuant to oral or written technical directions issued other than in accordance with the provisions herein shall be at the Contractor's risk of not recovering related costs incurred and corresponding proportionate amount of fixed fee, if any.

(End of Text)

ORDERING

a. Ordering: Services to be furnished under this contract shall be furnished at such times as ordered by the issuance of Task Orders (TOs) on DD Form 1155 or SF 1449 by the Ordering Officer. All orders issued hereunder are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. This contract shall control in the event of conflict with any TO. When mailed, a TO shall be "issued" for purpose of this contract at the time the Government deposits the order in the mail, or, if transmitted by other means, when physically delivered to the Contractor.

b. Ordering Procedures: Due to the operational concerns of issuing task orders for required repairs, the PCO determined the use of Routine and Emergency Repair TDLs to be in the best interest of the government for this requirement. In an effort to mitigate risk to the government and to ensure TDLs are not used as pseudo task orders, modifications, identify new deliverables, increase labor categories or mix proposed by the contractor, the PCO intends to incorporate the following processes:

Routine Repair TDL

1. Request for maintenance and repair be requested by the COR on the corresponding TDL template in the solicitation (Attachment 4).

2. The COR shall specify for each repair from the line item using the pricing spreadsheet.

3. Each TDL shall be issued for a specific time, task and location. The TDL shall not include ambiguous, all inclusive language such as: repair parts and service calls.

4. Each TDL must include, at a minimum, the date of the repair, the contract and repair TDL number, printed name and contact information of the COR and PCO, reference to the relevant section or item in the PWS, signatures and dates of the PCO and COR.

5. A TDL numbering system and log included in the solicitation will be provided to the COR for tracking purposes for each repair requirement. The TDL will be numbered beginning with R0001 for Repairs. Each TDL must be reviewed by the PCO or ACO prior to being issued by the COR.

6. The PCO shall receive copies of all Repair TDLs when copies are distributed to the contractor. The COR shall maintain a TDL log, and copies of all TDLs issued.

7. All contract terms and conditions will apply to each Repair TDL.

8. In the event of a conflict between a TDL and this contract, the contract shall take precedence and the PCO may cancel the TDL process and individual task orders will be used for repairs.

9. Upon issuance of contract task order, the COR shall submit to the PCO a numbered Repair TDL in accordance with the PWS and pricing spreadsheet. For each TDL issued, the COR shall provide the cost and the number of days after TDL in accordance with the pricing spreadsheet (Attachment 3).

Emergency Repair TDL

1. In the event of unforeseen repairs, the COR shall issue an Emergency Repair TDL in accordance with the TDL numbering system (E0001) and TDL template (Attachment 5).

2. Once a quote is received from the contractor for the associated repairs, the COR shall obtain documentation from the contractor to determine the cost of parts and material fair and reasonable. The COR shall provide historical documentation of similar repairs and parts used, receipts and catalog prices.

3. The COR shall complete the Repair TDL template in accordance with the pricing spreadsheet to illustrate the repairs cost of parts and materials.

4. Additionally, the COR shall specify for each repair the number of days after issuance of a Repair TDL for delivery. For each repair, the COR shall provide, the number of hours for repair, the labor rate and parts required for the repair. The COR shall use the Repair TDL in accordance with the pricing spreadsheet of proposed parts and materials from the contractor.

c. Unilateral Orders issued under an urgent requirement. TOs under this contract will ordinarily be issued after both parties agree on all terms. If the parties fail to agree, the Ordering Officer may require the Contractor to perform and any disagreement shall be deemed a dispute within the meaning of the Disputes clause.

d. Each Repair TDL issued for repairs shall be bilaterally signed by the PCO, COR and contractor.

e. Cautionary Note. Nothing stated in the TO, in a quote, or in discussions thereto, can modify the basic contract terms or regulations governing this contract.

The contractor shall invoice in accordance with FAR clause 252.232-7006.

(End of text)

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION APPOINTMENTS AND DUTIES

In order to expedite administration of this contract/order, the following delineation of duties is provided including the names, addresses and phone numbers for each individual or office as specified. The individual/position designated as having responsibility should be contacted for any questions, clarifications or information regarding the functions assigned.

1. PROCURING CONTRACTING OFFICER (PCO) is responsible for:

a. All pre-award information, questions, or data;

b. Freedom of Information inquiries;

c. Change/question/information regarding the scope, terms or conditions of the basic contract document; and/or

d. Arranging the post award conference (See FAR 42.503).

Name: Eric Dieges

Address: NAVSUP FLC Norfolk

1968 Gilbert Street Suite 600

Norfolk, VA 23511

Phone: 757-443-1373

2. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE (CAO) is responsible for matters specified in FAR 42.302 and

DFARS 242.302 except in those areas otherwise designated herein.

Name: Eric Dieges

Address: NAVSUP FLC Norfolk

1968 Gilbert Street Suite 600

Norfolk, VA 23511

Phone: 757-443-1373

3. DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) is responsible for audit verification/provisional approval of invoices and final audit of the contract prior to final payment to the contractor.

4. PAYING OFFICE is responsible for payment of proper invoices after acceptance is documented.

5. CONTRACTING OFFICERS REPRESENTATIVE (COR) is responsible for:

a. Liaison with personnel at the Government installation and the contractor personnel on site;

b. Technical advice/recommendations/clarification on the statement of work;

c. The statement of work for delivery/task orders placed under this contract.

d. An independent government estimate of the effort described in the definitized statement of work;

e. Quality assurance of services performed and acceptance of the services or deliverables;

f. Government furnished property;

g. Security requirements on Government installation;

h. Providing the PCO or his designated Ordering Officer with appropriate funds for issuance of the Delivery/Task order; and/or

i. Certification of invoice for payment.

NOTE: When, in the opinion of the Contractor, the COR requests effort outside the existing scope of the contract (or delivery/task order), the Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer (or Ordering Officer) in writing.

No action shall be taken by the contractor under such direction until the Contracting Officer has issued a modification to the contract or, in the case of a delivery/task order, until the Ordering Officer has issued a modification of the delivery/task order; or until the issue has otherwise been resolved. THE COR IS NOT AN

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER AND DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DIRECT

THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF EFFORT WHICH IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK

IN THE CONTRACT OR DELIVERY/TASK ORDER.

COR Name: LSC Darryl Benson

Tel: (office) 202-433-9642

E-Mail: darryl.benson@navy.mil

In the event that the COR named above is absent due to leave, illness, or official business, all responsibilities and functions assigned to the COR will be the responsibility of the alternate COR listed below:

ACOR Name: LS1 Patrice Rice

Tel: (office) 202-433-9642

E-Mail: patrice.rice@navy.mil

6. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, if assigned by the requiring activity, is responsible for providing technical assistance and support to the COR in contract administration by:

a. Identifying contractor deficiencies to the COR;

b. Reviewing contract/delivery/task order deliverables and recommending acceptance/rejection of deliverables;

c. Identifying contractor noncompliance of reporting requirements;

d. Evaluating contractor proposals for specific contracts/orders and identifying areas of concern affecting negotiations;

e. Reviewing contractor reports providing recommendations for acceptance/rejection;

f. Reviewing invoices for appropriateness of costs and providing recommendations to facilitate certification of the invoice;

g. Providing COR with timely input regarding the SOW, technical direction to the contractor and recommending corrective actions; and

h. Providing written reports to the COR as required concerning trips, meetings or conversations with the contractor.

Name: NA

Address: ------------------------------------------------

Phone: ------------------------------------------------

7. ORDERING OFFICER is responsible for:

a. Requesting, obtaining, and evaluating proposals for orders to be issued;

b. Determining the estimated cost of the order is fair and reasonable for the effort proposed;

c. Obligating the funds by issuance of the delivery/task order;

d. Authorization for use of overtime;

e. Authorization to begin performance; and/or

f. Monitoring of total cost of delivery/task orders issued.

The following limitations/restrictions are placed on the Ordering Officer:

a. Type of order issued is limited by this contract to ------------------- pricing arrangements;

b. No order shall be placed in excess of $------------------ without the prior approval of the PCO; and/or

c. No order shall be placed with delivery requirements in excess of ------------------------.

Name: To Be Determined (TBD)

Address: ------------------------------------------------

Phone: ------------------------------------------------

MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM QUANTITIES

As referred to in paragraph (b) of the "Indefinite Quantity" clause of this contract, the contract minimum quantity is a total of $10,000.00 worth of orders at the contract unit price(s). The recording of the obligation of funds associated with the guaranteed minimum amount under the basic contract will be issued under task order(s)/delivery order(s) immediately upon award of this contract. The maximum quantity is the total "not to exceed" quantity for each item as set forth in the schedule. The maximum quantity is not to be exceeded without prior approval of the

Administrative Contracting Officer.

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Performance Work Statement

Washers and Dryers Repair and Maintenance

Naval District Washington, DC

1. Introduction. Naval District Washington, DC requires Preventive Maintenance (PM) and repairs of

Government owned washers, dryers, refrigerators and dish washers (hereafter referred to as “Appliances”) located at the following bases on a quarterly basis: Navy Information Operations Command (NIOC) Fort Meade, Naval

Support Activity (NSA) Dahlgren, Naval Air Station (NAS) Patuxent River, Joint Base Anacostia Bolling (JBAB), NSA Annapolis, and NSA Bethesda

2. Scope of Work. The Contractor shall provide all management, personnel, facilities, equipment, tools material, transportation, supervision, labor and other items, and services necessary to perform maintenance/repair of gas, electric, stackable and combo appliances. Services shall be performed in accordance with this PWS as well as specific procedures described in the manufacturers’ repair/maintenance/operating manuals and all applicable federal regulations and laws.

2.1. EMERGENCY REPAIR SERVICE (WOUNDED WARRIOR ONLY). The Contractor shall be on site within

5 hours of an emergency service call, once identified as “emergency” by the government representative. The government representatives are the POC’s listed on this PWS. Service required for repairs to restore failed or failing appliance to its intended capability or use. Repairs shall be accomplished by replacement or restoration of component parts or materials that have deteriorated, worn out, broken, or are unable to perform to current prescribed standards. Emergency repair service is required in the prescribed time period to protect facilities, equipment, and personnel from losses that could occur from non-operating equipment.

3. Equipment Characteristics and Identification by Location

Edward Pendleton

9803 Cochrane Rd

NIOC/Fort Meade, MD 20755

PH: (301)-677-0356

PH: (301)-677-0400

edward.pendleton@navy.mil

3.1 NIOC Fort Meade Bldg. 9803

Appliance Type Brand Model Quantity

Washing Machine FRIGIDAIRE AFFINITY FAFS4474LWO 13

Washing Machine SPEED QUEEN LWNA11SP111TW01 2

Washing Machine SPEED QUEEN LTSAOAWN 1

Washing Machine WHIRLPOOL WTW4800BQ1 1

Washing Machine WHIRLPOOL CABRIO WTW5500XW0 6

Drying Machine MAYTAGCOMMERCIALMLE24PRAYW2 18

3.2 NIOC Fort Meade Bldg. 9804

Washing Machine FRIGIDAIRE AFFINITY FAFS4474LWO 4

Washing Machine WHIRLPOOL CABRIO WTW4800BQ1 4

Drying Machine MAYTAGCOMMERCIALMLE24PRAYW2 12

3.3 NSA Dahlgren Bldg. 962

Mr. Rodney Kayes

Mrs. Shanel Byrd

17410 Potomac Inn Rd

Dahlgren, VA 22448

PH: (301)-744-4317

PH: (540)-653-2308

rodney.kayes@navy.mil greneik.byrd@navy.mil

Washer/Dryer Stackable FRIDGIDAIRE GLEH1642FS1 12

Washer/Dryer Stackable GE WSM2700TDWWB 96

Washer/Dryer Stackable MAYTAG WSM2700TDWWB 12

Washer/Dryer Stackable WHIRLPOOL LTE5243DQ6 36

Washer/Dryer Stackable WHIRLPOOL WTW5590VQ1 4

Washer WHIRLPOOL ETW4400XQ 2

Dryer WHIRLPOOL MY2185448 2

Dryer WHIRLPOOL MC4114785 1

3.4 NSA Dahlgren Bldg. 959

Washer/Dryer Stackable MAYTAG MVWC200XW2 6

Dryer MAYTAG M14478108 1

Dryer MAYTAG M14478669 1

Dryer MAYTAG M14478673 1

3.5 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 468

Mr. Ross Keane

CSC Andrea Keith

Naval Air Station Patuxent River

1400 Buse Road, Bldg. 1455

Patuxent River, MD 20670-1506

PH: (301) 757-5517

PH: (301) 757-0666

george.keane@navy.mil andrae.keith@navy.mil

Washer FRIGIDAIRE FAHE1011MWO 2

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 1

Washer SPEED QUEEN SWNMN2PP112TWO1 1

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 2

Dryer SPEED QUEEN SDE807WF 1

Dryer INGLIS IED4400VQ1 1

3.6 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 492

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 1

Washer MAYTAG MHWE450WW01 1

Washer WHIRLPOOL MTW700DW0 1

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 6

3.7 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 1451

Washer FRIGIDAIRE FAHE1011MWO 1

Washer GE GTWP2005MOCC 1

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 6

Washer WHIRLPOOL WTW7000DWO 1

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 9

3.8 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 1452

Washer ROPER RTW4440XQO 1

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWNA11SP112TW01 1

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 6

Washer SPEED QUEEN SWNMN2PP112TWO1 1

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 8

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LWNA11SP112TW01 1

3.9 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 1453

Washer GE WJSR2070B2WW 2

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 6

Washer WHIRLPOOL WED5300STO 1

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 7

Dryer WHIRLPOOL WTW5590ST2 1

3.10 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 1454

Washer ROPER RTW4440XQO 2

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWNA11SP112TW01 3

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 4

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 7

Dryer INGLIS IED4400VQ1 2

3.11 NAS Patuxent River Bldg. 1455

Washer MAYTAG MER60PNCTS 1

Washer FRIGIDAIRE FAHE1011MWO 1

Washer ROPER RTW4440XQO 2

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS01NW 3

Dryer SPEED QUEEN LES17AWF 5

Dryer American Dryer Corp ADG758V 1

3.12 Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Bldg. 72

Ms. Tanya Johnson

Joint Base Anacostia Bolling

2270 Enterprise Way, SW, BLDG 72 Suite 113-9

Washington, DC 20373

PH :( 202)-767-4700

PH: (202)-685-0878

iris.jones@navy.mil tanya.a.johnson@navy.mil

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWS44NW 5

Washer SPEED QUEEN LWN412SP111TW01 2

Washer MAYTAG MAT13MNLWW 1

Washer WHIRLPOOL WTW559OST2 3

Washer UNIMAC INDUSTRIAL UTC40BN2YU60001 2

Washer/Dryer Stackable AMERICAN DRYER CORP. ADE330 10

Washer GE TOP LOAD WASHER GCWN2800DOWW 1

Dryer MAYTAG MEDB400Q0 1

Dryer MAYTAG MDE2400AYW 1

Dryer WHIRLPOOL GTDX180EDOWW 1

Dryer WHIRLPOOL LER6636PW0 1

Dryer WHIRLPOOL WED5300ST0 2

3.12 Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Bldg. 417

Washer WHIRLPOOL GOLD GSW9559LWO 1

Washer MAYTAG MED4600TQ0 1

Washer WHIRLPOOL GHW9150PW4 2

Dryer ELECTROLUX EIMEDD5511WO 1

3.13 Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Honor Guard

Washer KENMORE SEREIS 100 10514511 6

Dryer KENMORE SEREIS 200 10514511 6

3.14 Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Blanchard Hall

Washer KENMORE SEREIS 100 10514511 36

Dryer KENMORE SEREIS 200 10514511 36

3.15 NSA Annapolis Bldg. 46

Mr. E.J. Farmer

Mr. Edwin Pabalate

Annapolis, MD 21406

PH: (410)-293-9067/9066/9070

elmer.farmer@navy.mil edwin.pabalate@navy.mil

Washer WHIRLPOOL WTW550ST2 6

Washer WHIRLPOOL LSQ9200PQ0 6

Dryer WHIRPOOL LER5636EQ3 10

Dryer WHIRPOOL LER7648PQ0 7

Dryer WHIRLPOOL WED5300STO 5

Dryer MAYTAG MEDE400XWO 1

Dryer GE/Dryer DVLR223EG7WW 1

3.16 NSA Annapolis Bldg. 47

Washer FRIGIDAIRE AFFINITY FAFW3511KWO 1

Dryer MAYTAG 4000 SERIES MEDE400XWO 1

3.17 NSA Bethesda Bldg. 50

Ms. Sharon Tremble

Ms. Debb Epperson

Bldg. 17 Suite 3D RM 3253

Wisconsin Ave

Bethesda, MD 20889-5600

PH: (301)-400-3035

PH: (301)-400-3031

sharon.h.tremble.civ@mail.mil deborah.l.epperson.civ@mail.mil

Washer SPEED QUEEN FTSAOAWN 6

Dryer SPEED QUEEN FES17AWF 6

3.18 NSA Bethesda Bldg. 60

Washer SPEED QUEEN FTSAOAWN 17

Dryer SPEED QUEEN FES17AWF 17

3.19 NSA Bethesda Bldg. 61

Washer SPEED QUEEN FTSAOAWN 17

Dryer SPEED QUEEN FES17AWF 18

3.20 NSA Bethesda Bldg. 62 Wounded Warrior

Washer MAYTAG MHWE200XW00-6 150

Washer MAYTAG MHW3000BW 15

Dryer MAYTAG MEDE200XW 148

Refrigerator GE MN-GTH17JBC2RWW 151

Refrigerator GE GTH17GBEWW 9

Refrigerator GE GTH17GBEWW 1

Dishwasher GE MN-GLDA690PO2WW 151

4. Performance Objectives

Preventive Maintenance:

The Contractor shall provide the COR with a schedule of the intended dates for accomplishing equipment preventive maintenance. The manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule shall be used for each appliance.

The Contractor shall notify the equipment users not less than 48 hours in advance of performing the scheduled preventive maintenance. All work shall be scheduled to be performed at a time convenient to the user, unless coordinated otherwise by the COR. Scheduled checks and services including, but not limited to, adjustments, cleaning, calibration, inspection, and equipment servicing of installed equipment and utility systems at intervals recommended by the manufacturer or standards within the industry to insure proper and efficient operation with minimum breakdowns, deterioration, or other deficiencies. Preventive maintenance shall also include repairs or other actions taken to correct deficiencies discovered during preventive maintenance inspections. All work associated with this contract shall be performed by qualified service personnel.

4.1 The contractor shall monitor, inspect, and clean (appliance surfaces) all washers and dryers monthly to ensure equipment is operational and performing according to design.

4.2 The contractor shall submit a monthly maintenance and cleaning schedule to the respective COR at least five business days before the start of each month. The schedule shall include the date and approximate time each machine shall be serviced.

4.3 Preventative maintenance shall be performed to identify potential problems and to repair them before equipment failure. Washer and dryer connections such as hoses, exhaust vents, gas lines, etc., shall be inspected during the scheduled equipment inspections. The contractor shall inspect and clean all dryer exhaust vents monthly, from the dryer itself to the permanent exhaust system. In facilities where multi dryer ducts are available, the contractor will be allowed to shut off only one 50% of the system at a given time for cleaning.

4.4 The contractor shall inspect dryer lint filters and immediately replace torn or unusable filters. Contractor shall ensure dryer exhaust vents are properly secured to dryer and exhaust ducting at all times to prevent fire hazards. Contractor shall identify and replace deteriorated ducting as part of the monthly cleaning schedule.

Contractor shall ensure areas surrounding dryers are free from lint, debris, etc., after each service.

4.5 Repairs:

EMERGENCY REPAIR SERVICE: The Contractor shall be on site within 5 hours of an emergency service call, once identified as “emergency” by the government representative. The government representatives are the POC’s listed on this PWS. Service required for repairs to restore failed or failing appliance to its intended capability or use.

Repairs shall be accomplished by replacement or restoration of component parts or materials that have deteriorated, worn out, broken, or are unable to perform to current prescribed standards. Emergency repair service is required in the prescribed time period to protect facilities, equipment, and personnel from losses that could occur from non-operating equipment.

5. The Contracting Officer Representative (COR) / (TA- Tech POC):

COR / TA – Tech POC: LSC Darryl Benson

Tel: (office) 202-433-9642

E-Mail: darryl.benson@navy.mil

ACOR / TA – Tech POC: LS1 Patrice Rice

Tel: (office) 202-433-9642

E-Mail: patrice.rice@navy.mil mailto:darryl.benson@navy.mil

6. SUPTXT 203.1106-1 (3-18):

THE FOLLOWING NAVSUP LOCAL TEXT IS HEREBY MADE PART OF THE STATEMENT OF

WORK/PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT.

NAVSUP FLCN may utilize contractor support through the AbilityOne Program, as needed, to perform contract closeout functions for this acquisition. Information, including business sensitive/confidential or proprietary data, that the offeror provides to the Government or information already in the possession of the Government may be viewed and utilized by the AbilityOne Program support contractor personnel during the course of its contract performance.

The information that may be made available to the support contractor may include, for example, pricing and technical proposals, historical contract, pricing and performance information, Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) reporting information and similar data/information.

By submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation, the offeror and its subcontractors consent to a release of their business sensitive/confidential or proprietary data to the Government's AbilityOne Program support contractor personnel in order to perform close out services. Prior to the release of any such information to the support contractor, the support contractor will have in place with the Government a Non-Disclosure/Non-Use Agreement in accordance with the terms of the AbilityOne Program support contract.

Offerors may execute their own Non-Disclosure Agreement with the AbilityOne Program (AbilityOne contact information available from the contracting point of contact). The support contractor must provide copies of the executed agreements to the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for the support contract; and the offeror/contractor for this acquisition must provide copies of the executed Agreement to the

Contracting Officer for this acquisition. If the offeror/contractor seeks such a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the

AbilityOne Program support contractor, the Agreement must be executed no later than the date of final delivery under the resulting NAVSUP FLCN contract.

NMCARS 5237.102-90(B)

The contractor shall report contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the Naval District Washington via a secure data collection site.

Contracted services excluded from reporting are based on Product Service Codes (PSCs). The excluded PSCs are:

(1) W, Lease/Rental of Equipment;

(2) X, Lease/Rental of Facilities;

(3) Y, Construction of Structures and Facilities;

(4) D, Automatic Data Processing and Telecommunications, IT and Telecom- Telecommunications Transmission

(D304) and Internet (D322) ONLY;

(5) S, Utilities ONLY;

(6) V, Freight and Shipping ONLY.

The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address:

https://www.ecmra.mil.

Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year

(FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the help desk, linked at https://www.ecmra.mil.

5252.243-9400 Authorized Changes Only By The Contracting Officer (Jan 1992)

(a) Except as specified in paragraph (b) below, no order, statement, or conduct of Government personnel who visit the Contractor's facilities or in any other manner communicate with Contractor personnel during the performance of this contract shall constitute a change under the "Changes" clause of this contract.

(b) The Contractor shall not comply with any order, direction or request of Government personnel unless it is issued in writing and signed by the Contracting Officer, or is pursuant to specific authority otherwise included as a part of this contract.

(c) The Contracting Officer is the only person authorized to approve changes in any of the requirements of this contract and notwithstanding provisions contained elsewhere in this contract, the said authority remains solely with the Contracting Officer. In the event the Contractor effects any change at the direction of any person other than the

Contracting Officer, the change will be considered to have been made without authority and no adjustment will be made in the contract price to cover any increase in charges incurred as a result thereof. The address and telephone number of the Contracting Officer is:

NAME: Eric Dieges

ADDRESS: NAVSUP FLC Norfolk

1948 Gilbert St, Suite 600

TELEPHONE: 757-443-1373

(End of Clause)

Contractor Unclassified Access to Federally Controlled Facilities, Sensitive Information, Information

Technology (IT) Systems or Protected Health Information

(July 2013)

Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12, requires government agencies to develop and implement

Federal security standards for Federal employees and contractors. The Deputy Secretary of Defense Directive-Type

Memorandum (DTM) 08-006 – “DoD Implementation of Homeland Security Presidential Directive – 12 (HSPD-

12)” dated November 26, 2008 (or its subsequent DoD instruction) directs implementation of HSPD-12. This clause is in accordance with HSPD-12 and its implementing directives.

APPLICABILITY

This clause applies to contractor employees requiring physical access to any area of a federally controlled base, facility or activity and/or requiring access to a DoN or DoD computer/network/system to perform certain unclassified sensitive duties. This clause also applies to contractor employees who access Privacy Act and Protected

Health Information,…