N00178-20-R-4300_RFI_Amendment 2.pdf

MARK FOR:

(X) AMENDMENT (2) TO SYNOPSIS

( ) MODIFICATION TO PREVIOUS PRESOLICITATION NOTICE

( ) SOURCES SOUGHT

( ) SPECIAL NOTICE

( ) COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION

THIS IS FOR SYNOPSIS #: N00178-20-R-4300

Submitted by: Michael P. Butler NAICS Code: 332999 PSC Code: 5999

Anticipated Date to be published in BETA.SAM: 11 June 2020

Anticipated Solicitation Issue Date: TBD

POC Code/Name: Michael P. Butler Telephone#: 540-653-0707

Email Address: michael.p.butler2@navy.mil

Subject: HIGH ENERGY LASER (HEL) RAPID PROTOTYPING

Type of Action: Request for Information

Amendment 2:

(1) Amend the SOW

From: Technical Data Packages (TDP) shall be of sufficient quality to enable prototype reproduction by qualified vendors. As a minimum, per MIL-STD-31000, TDP quality shall be Level II (Developmental) with Level III (Production) aspects as specified in individual Delivery Orders.

To: Technical Data Packages (TDP) shall be of sufficient quality to enable prototype reproduction by qualified vendors.

NSWCDD has an interest in developing a multi-award vehicle to compete build to print items (rapid prototypes) among a selection of pre-qualified vendors. Vendors shall provide hardware and components in accordance with specific drawing packages.

Responses to this RFI should include detailed information about the manufacturer’s ability to manufacture build to print prototypes and hardware.

There are no limitations on what a response should include, but should have at a minimum:

Company Name and Address

Point of Contact (to include phone/email)

Cage Code

Capability Statement

NSWCDD requests offerors’ responses NO LATER THAN 12:00 PM EST 2 October

2020. Offerors are encouraged to submit responses prior to this date. Submissions will be accepted after this date but feedback may not be as timely or contribute to NSWCDD’s strategic planning. All communications with industry must be coordinated through the cognizant Contract Specialist, via e-mail at michael.p.butler2@navy.mil.

At no cost to the Government, responding vendors/offerors may continue dialogue via this market survey through the Contract Specialist after the initial response is provided.

Eligible partners who may respond to this synopsis include companies, public and private foundations, non-profit organizations (including universities) and state or local government organizations.

Extended Description:

This synopsis is being posted to the BETA.SAM page located at https://beta.sam.gov.

This is a Request for Information (RFI) by the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren

Division (NSWCDD). This RFI is published in accordance with FAR 15.201(e) and is for

PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. It does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a commitment by the U.S. Government, nor should it be construed as such. Respondents are advised that NSWCDD is under no obligation to acknowledge receipt of information received or provide feedback to respondents with respect to any information submitted under this RFI. There shall be no basis for claims against the Government as a result of any information submitted in response to this RFI. The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this RFI or reimburse RFI preparation costs incurred by any offeror when providing the information requested under this notice. If a solicitation is released at a future date, it will be synopsized on the BETA.SAM website.

It is the responsibility of any potential offeror to monitor this site for additional information pertaining to this requirement.

This notice of intent is NOT a request for competitive proposals, as the Government intends this for planning purposes only. The Government will not pay for any information received.

Information received shall be treated as Business Sensitive and will not be shared outside

Government activities and agencies.

All responses should be unclassified. Information and materials submitted in response to this request will NOT be returned.

mailto:michael.p.butler2@navy.mil

If responses contain proprietary data, it shall be marked appropriately. It is the respondent’s responsibility to clearly define to the Government what is considered proprietary data.