About this file

Amendment 0006

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Combined EO/IR Surveillance and Response System (CESARS) program - Shipboard Panoramic EO/IR Cueing and Surveillance System (SPECSS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_0008.pdf PDF
Amendment_0007.pdf PDF
Amendment_0005.pdf PDF
Requesting_Controlled_Documents_on_FBO.pdf PDF
Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
N00173-15-R-SE05.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation_Synopsis_15RSE05_Figure_1.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Solicitation Number: N00173-15-R-SE05 Amendment 0006

The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions received from potential offerors.

Question 1: If on-site work is required, will it be required at the NRL DC campus on Overlook Ave SW or at the Stennis Space Center in MS?

Answer: If on-site work is required it will be at NRL-DC on Overlook Ave.

Question 2: Section L, page 59 of the solicitation limits the Technical Approach section to 25 pages:

“The Technical Approach Section of Volume 1 – Technical Management Proposal [not including the Key Personnel, Company Experience or Past Performance Sections] shall not exceed 25 pages in length for each product the bidder addresses”

The SOW page 5 requires the hyperhemispherical solution to be a separately executable, separately priced option:

“FOV (degrees): 360 H, 45 V (B) - [15 down 30 up wrt horizon], 105 V (hyperhemispherical) (E).

Any offer for a solution that addresses the extended requirement shall also include an approach that only addresses the baseline requirement, with the extended solution offered as a separately executable and separately priced option. Any offer that addresses the extended vertical field of view requirement shall not compromise any performance metric within the baseline vertical region.

Since addressing the hyperhemishierical option is required to be a “separately executable and separately priced option”, please confirm that additional page count solely addressing the hyperhemispherical option is permissible. We recommend that this additional page count be limited to a maximum of 5 pages.

Answer: An additional 5 pages for description of the ‘hyperhemispherical option’ in the technical proposal is permissible.

Question 3: In Amendment 5 of the solicitation, the Government provided the following clarification. As a follow up to the clarification, is the MTBF a desire per the SOW wording or a compliance level requirement as listed in the table, RFP Attachment 1, P. 5 and Attachment 1, P. 6, Table 1)?

Answer: This is a compliance level baseline requirement. Additionally, offerors are reminded of the following language in the Scope section on page 3 in the RFP Attachment 1, “Proposals that offer an approach with minor deviations from the baseline metrics with compelling technical, risk, or cost justification will be considered.”

IDCode:
Page: 1
Pages: 2
AmendNo: 0006
EffDate: 8/4/15
ReqNo:
ProjNo:
IssCode: N00173
IssuedBy: Contracting Officer Code 3235:RAW

Naval Research Laboratory - SSC Department of the Navy Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-5004

AdmCode:
AdminBy:
ContName:
ContStrt:
ContCnty: TO ALL OFFERORS
ContSt:
ContZIP:
Code:
FacCode:
SolAmdNo: N00173-15-R-SE05
AmendDate: 06/23/15
ModNo:
ModDate:
NoCopies: 1
Amended: Yes
ApprData:
ChgeOrder:
Modify: Off
SuppAuth:
OthrSpec:
Require: Off
Copies:
Descript:

See Page 2

SignName:
SignTitl:
ContDate:
CoName:
CoTitle:
CODate:
SolChgYs: Yes
SolChgNo: Off
OffrExt: Off
OffrNoEx: No
ChgeOrd: Off
SuppAgre: Off
ModOthr: Off
NoReq: Off
Text2: AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .