17RWP07_sol_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extended the solicitation to December 14 2016.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Dec-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-17-R-WP07

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Nov-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Dec-2016

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

A. WALKER (812-854-5236)

BLDG 121

300 HWY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-17-R-WP07

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 08-Dec-2016 04:00 PM to 14-Dec-2016 04:00 PM.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

CNIN-L-0011 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS – Past Performance Price Tradeoff (Mar 2015)

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

The contractor’s proposal shall include the following:

Required Submittal Volume Number

Technical Capability Information Summary – Unclassified Volume I (25 page limit)

Past Performance Summaries & Matrix - Unclassified Volume II (5 page limit for summary) (1 page limit for matrix)

Completed Solicitation including pricing – Unclassified Volume III

General Information:

a) Delivery & Submission Method

1) Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Proposals. Mailed or commercially delivered hard or soft copy proposals shall be sent to the address in Block 7 on Page 1 of the Solicitation and shall be received by the date and time in Block 9 on Page 1 of the solicitation. Please provide shipping information to the Contract Specialist at antonio.r.walker1@navy.mil if a hard copy is being sent.

If a hard copy proposal is submitted, a soft copy of the proposal shall also be provided on CD- ROMs/DVDs, read-only memory. Utilization of Microsoft Office products is preferred.

2) Electronic Delivery of Proposals. Electronic submission to antonio.r.walker1@navy.mil is acceptable.

Timeliness of proposals will be determined in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) or FAR 52.215- 1(c)(3)(ii)(A) as applicable. Do not send .zip files or other large electronic files via email. Utilization of AMRDEC SAFE, at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx , is an acceptable transmission tool. AMRDEC SAFE supports files sizes up to 2GB. If using AMRDEC, submit in sufficient time in order to verify the POC received the notification from AMRDEC by the closing date and time and is able to access the uploaded proposal files.

Any proposal sent by electronic submission must be completely received in the POC's email inbox prior to the time the solicitation closes in order to be timely; therefore, please take into consideration the time the electronic transmission process may take for the POC to actually receive your email when submitting. NSWC Crane will NOT accept facsimile proposals or proposals submitted via Navy Electronic Business Opportunities (NECO).

b) Proposal Format. Format of the proposal volumes shall be as follows:

1) Text size shall be no smaller than what is equivalent to Microsoft Word, Times New Roman, 10 point, uncompressed font.

2) Pages shall be single sided, one and one half spaced, with a minimum of one inch margins on all sides.

Pages shall be dated and numbered sequentially by volume. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, “original” or copy number, solicitation identification, and the offeror's name.

3) Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each.

4) Elaborate format, color representations, and bindings are not desirable. Three-ring binders are preferred. The pages in the binders shall be easily removed and replaced to facilitate page changes.

Any pages that are changed (as the result of negotiations) should be of a different color (as specified by the Contracting Officer) and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page and/or circling if changing data in a chart. The offeror shall indicate the new date on revised pages.

5) Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used when necessary to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 by 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume and count as one page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics; not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs, and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 8 point, Times New Roman.

6) Offerors shall include their best terms in their initial proposals.

I. Technical Capability

a) The Technical Capability Information shall be submitted as Volume I.

1. Offerors shall not include any pricing within Volume 1.

2. Offerors shall identify any “exceptions” to the Specifications, Drawings, and Statement of Work and state precisely how the offered supplies/services differ from the solicitation documents.

3. Offerors SHALL include:

Offeror’s shall provide a written proposal that demonstrates the ability to meet the requirements for evaluating, overhauling/refurbishing and manufacturing, the Waveguide Switch and Band Pass Filter. Reference Paragraphs 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the Statement of Work (SOW).

Offeror’s shall provide a written technical proposal that demonstrates the ability to meet the requirements contained in the Drawings and Specifications as provided in SOW Paragraph 2.1 and the specifications contained in drawing 709449 (Switch, Waveguide) Paragraphs 3 through

3.2.13.2 and drawing 711809 (Filter, Band Pass IFF) Notes 1 through 10 and drawing 709356 (Parameters) Paragraphs1 through 4.3.

Offeror’s shall provide a detailed written technical proposal that demonstrates their capability to manufacture Band Pass Filters. The proposal should demonstrate knowledge of Radio Frequency (RF) devices. Proposal should indicate ISO 9001 or similar certification addressing consistency and quality assurance.

Offeror shall describe in detail their schedule indicating time frames and steps required for overhaul/refurbishment/manufacturing RF equipment. The schedule should include milestones and procedures to recover from unexpected delays.

Examples may include:

Product literature Overhauling/refurbishing, manufacturing items similar to waveguide switches and band pass filters.

Place of performance/production capacity Conformance to the requirements outlined in the SOW/Spec/Drawings/TDP

List of equipment to be used during the manufacturing process or to perform final acceptance testing

Production capacity/facility availability Standard inspection procedures and/or quality management/assurance process

NOTE: Without this information, the Offeror may be deemed unacceptable and may not considered be for further evaluation.

b) Offerors shall enable Government evaluators to thoroughly evaluate and determine if the proposal will meet the requirements.

c) Offerors shall be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements and has valid and practical solutions to technical problems.

d) Offerors shall not paraphrase the specifications/Statement of Work or attest that "standard procedures will be employed.” This is inadequate to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the requirements of the specification/Statement of Work.

II. Past Performance

a) The Past Performance portion of the proposal shall be submitted as a part of Volume II.

b) Offerors shall provide a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) past performance references on prior contracts that are recent and relevant to this requirement.

c) Offerors shall contact past performance references directly and request that they complete and submit the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Exhibit C) to antonio.r.walker1@navy.mil before the closing date and time in Block 9 of Page 1 of the Solicitation. Under no circumstances shall the completed PPQs be sent to or by the proposing offerors. Any information provided by the offeror’s references is subject to verification/validation by the Government during the evaluation process. In the event references are not received by the close of the solicitation, the Government may make contact and follow up with the listed references.

d) Offeror shall provide a one (1) page matrix identifying the following information for each of the PPQs sent out:

1) Organization/Customer

2) Brief Description

3) Contract Number

4) Telephone & E-mail of Organization/Customer Point of Contact (POC)

Proposals must prove PPQs have been sent to each POC; failure to send the PPQ to each POC may result in exclusion of the offeror’s proposal from consideration for award. The offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure that at least two POCs per relevant contract submit a completed PPQ directly to the Government.

e) Offerors should include a discussion of any significant achievements and explain any rectification of Past Performance problems that are relevant to the proposed efforts.

f) For the purposes of this solicitation, recent contracts are defined as those on which performance occurred during the last three (3) years. In determining relevancy, the offeror should consider the type and value of the contract, and the type of requirement compared to this solicited requirement. Offerors should also consider the level or amount of effort. Only past performance dealing with the type of work noted in the drawing herein, will be considered relevant. Offerors must detail (if using the “related technology” as a reference) how the “related technology” is applicable to the solicited effort. Should the offerors not explain how the related technology is applicable, the reference may not be considered relevant.

If an offeror has no current or relevant past performance information, they should so state that in this volume.

g) Each offeror shall submit present and past performance information for itself on projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity. The Offerors may choose to submit present and past performance information for major proposed subcontractors, team members, and/or joint venture partners that have experience in projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity with its proposal. The total number of past performance references for each offeror shall not exceed five (including any references submitted by subcontractors, team members and/or joint ventures). The offeror may submit performance on classified programs as long as that information can be verified in an unclassified manner. If the offeror intends to submit in this manner the information that is classified (customer, contract number, etc.) should be marked “reserved” and the description/write up of the work performed shall remain unclassified. If the offeror cannot describe what work was accomplished in an unclassified manner they cannot submit that program for evaluation. Offerors are notified that the Government will use the data provided in this volume that is determined to be current and relevant to the effort at hand and data obtained from other sources in the development of performance risk assessments.

III. Solicitation/Pricing Price will not be rated, but will be considered in determining the "best value" to the Government.

Price evaluations will be performed by the Contract Specialist and presented to the SSEB Chairperson following completion of the final SSER.

a) Pricing for IDIQ contracts will be evaluated based upon both an examination of the unit pricing proposed and the estimated delivery order quantities per year, multiplied by the offered price for that quantity range, all years summed, to arrive at an evaluated total.

b) Offerors shall submit a completed and signed solicitation package, with all representations and certifications executed within Section “K.”

c) Offerors shall submit unit prices for each item listed in Section “B.” Completion of unit pricing matrices is required, if provided.

The prices shall include all shipping and be proposed f.o.b. destination. EXCEPTIONS Offerors are not encouraged to take exceptions to this solicitation. Any exceptions taken to the terms and conditions of this solicitation shall be explained in detail and set forth in a cover letter. Offerors are to detail the particular section, clause paragraph and page to which they are taking exception. The Government is not required to concur with any exceptions, and Offerors are placed on notice that exceptions, depending on their significance, may result in an offer being determined unacceptable.

(End of Summary of Changes)