15RJQ76_amd_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0003 is hereby executed to 1.) revise the Low Rate Initial Production(LRIP) quantity from a minimum of 5 each to a minimum of 4 each 2.) add attachment 12 Labor Rate Price Matrix

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 38

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Feb-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-15-R-JQ76

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Jan-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Feb-2015

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

B. LINGENFELTER (812-854-5726)

BLDG 3168 CODE CXMR

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-15-R-JQ76

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been modified:

PRICE MATRIX

Offerors must submit pricing for all quantities contained in the quantity range for CLINs 0001, 0002, 1002, 2002, 3002, 4002, 5002, 6002, 7002, 8002, 9002, 1004, 2004, 3004, 4004, 5004, 6004, 7004, 8004, 9004, 1005, 2005, 3005, 4005, 5005, 6005, 7005, 8005, 9005, 0008, 1008, 2008, 3008, 4008, 5008, 6008, 7008, 8008, 9008, 0009, 1009, 2009, 3009, 4009, 5009, 6009, 7009, 8009, 9009

NOTE

1. The contract resulting from this solicitation will be Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ). The Government is not obligated to issue delivery orders beyond the minimum amount specified by the contract. Award resulting from this solicitation will have a contract minimum of TWO (2) Each of CLIN 0001. The Government is in no way obligated to procure or fund any amount beyond that minimum.

2. CLIN 0004 Non-Warranty Repairs, and CLIN 0005 Spares, are not utilized in year one.

3. Delivery Order 0002 will be for Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and will consist of a minimum quantity of four (4) each of CLIN 0002-CCFLIR2 Production Units, four (4) each of CLIN 0008-CCFLIR2 Installation Kits and four (4) each of CLIN 0009-CCFLIR2 Cable kits. Theses quantities correspond with the minimum quantities listed in Section “L”.

4. See PS 3.1 for a description of the CCFLIR2 system and the items that a system consists of. The contractor shall provide a list of all items in their proposal for CLIN 0001, Test Article Production, AND CLIN 0002 Low Rate Initial Production Units (LRIP) and Full Rate Production Units (FRP), include the description, part number and quantity.

5. The Proposed Non-Warranty Repair for CLINs 1004, 2004, 3004, 4004 and options 5004, 6004, 7004, 8004, 9004 should be submitted in accordance with Section “L” of this solicitation and paragraph 3.8 of the SOW. The proposed repair shall provide the estimated number of non-warranty repairs per year and category of repair based on the field schedule provided in Section “L” and propose firm fixed prices associated with Non-Warranty repair categories.

6. The Proposed Spare Parts List for CLINs 1005, 2005, 3005, 4005 and options 5005, 6005, 7005, 8005, 9005 should be delivered in a top-down breakdown format of the CCFLIR2 and shall include repairable and replacement parts (consumables) and delivery schedule. Each item on the Proposed Spare Parts List shall be priced and available for ordering. The Offeror shall provide a plan for sparing based on the field schedule provided in Section “L” and propose the firm fixed prices associated with spares repairs. This information should link back to the information provided under FACTOR II, Subfactor B. The Proposed Spare Parts List shall contain the part number, nomenclature, CAGE, Quantity, and Unit Price.

7. PRICING MATRICES FOR HARDWARE CLINS:

CLIN -0001 CCFLIR2 TEST ARTICLE PRODUCTION PRICING MATRIX MIN 2 MAX 3

QTY RANGE YEAR 1

1 UNIT

2 TO 3 UNITS

CLIN -0002, 1002, 2002, 3002, 4002, CCFLIR2 PRODUCTION UNITS MIN 0 MAX 58

Note: The maximum number for CLIN 0002-9002 is estimated at 58 units. However, based on Government need, the totals can exceed this maximum number of units but cannot exceed the total value of the contract.

QTY RANGE CLIN 0002,

YEAR 1

CLIN 1002

YEAR 2

CLIN 20002

YEAR 3

CLIN 3002

YEAR 4

CLIN 4002

YEAR 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

CLIN-5002, 6002, 7002, 8002, 9002, CCFLIR2 PRODUCTION UNITS OPTIONs

QTY RANGE CLIN 5002,

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6002

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7002

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8002

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9002

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

CLIN -0008,1008, 2008, 3008, 4008 INSTALLATION KIT MIN 0 MAX 75

QTY RANGE

CCA

CLIN 0008

YEAR 1

CLIN 1008

YEAR 2

CLIN 2008

YEAR 3

CLIN 3008

YEAR 4

CLIN 4008

Year 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCM

CLIN 0008

YEAR 1

CLIN 1008

YEAR 2

CLIN 2008

YEAR 3

CLIN 3008

YEAR 4

CLIN 4008

YEAR 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCH

CLIN 0008

YEAR 1

CLIN 1008

YEAR 2

CLIN 2008

YEAR 3

CLIN 3008

YEAR 4

CLIN 4008

YEAR 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

1 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

CLIN -5008, 6008, 7008, 8008, 9008 INSTALLATION KIT OPTIONs

QTY RANGE

CCA

CLIN 5008

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6008

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7008

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8008

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9008

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

12TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCM

CLIN 5008

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6008

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7008

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8008

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9008

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCH

CLIN 5008

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6008

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7008

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8008

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9008

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

CLIN – 0009, 1009, 2009, 3009, 4009 CABLE KIT MIN 0 MAX 75

QTY RANGE

CCA

CLIN 0009

YEAR 1

CLIN 1009

YEAR 2

CLIN 20089

YEAR 3

CLIN 3009

YEAR 4

CLIN 4009

Year 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCM

CLIN 0009

YEAR 1

CLIN 1009

YEAR 2

CLIN 20089

YEAR 3

CLIN 3009

YEAR 4

CLIN 4009

Year 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

QTY RANGE

CCH

CLIN 0009

YEAR 1

CLIN 1009

YEAR 2

CLIN 20089

YEAR 3

CLIN 3009

YEAR 4

CLIN 4009

Year 5

4 UNITS LRIP

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

CLIN -5009, 6009, 7009, 8009, 9009 CABLE KIT OPTIONs

QTY RANGE

CCA

CLIN 5009

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6009

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7009

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8009

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9009

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCM

CLIN 5009

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6009

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7009

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8009

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9009

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

QTY RANGE

CCH

CLIN 5009

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6009

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7009

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8009

OPTION 4

YEAR 9

CLIN 9009

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

The Proposed Non-Warranty Repair for CLINs 1004, 2004, 3004, 4004 and options 5004, 6004, 7004, 8004, 9004 should be submitted in accordance with Section “L” of this solicitation and paragraph 3.8 of the SOW. The proposed repair shall provide the estimated number of non-warranty repairs per year and category of repair based on the field schedule provided in Section “L” and propose firm fixed prices associated with Non-Warranty repair categories. The below matrix may be tailored to reflect the categories of Non-Warranty repairs.

CLIN -1004, 2004, 3004, 4004 NON-WARRANTY REPAIR

Repair Category

CLIN 1004

YEAR 2

CLIN 2004

YEAR 3

CLIN 3004

YEAR 4

CLIN 4004

YEAR 5

CLIN -5004, 6004, 7004, 8004, 9004 NON-WARRANTY REPAIR OPTIONs

Repair Category

CLIN 5004

OPTION 1

CLIN 6004

OPTION 2

CLIN 7004

OPTION 3

CLIN 8004

OPTION 3

CLIN 9004

OPTION 5

YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10

The Proposed Spare Parts List for CLINs 1005, 2005, 3005, 4005 and options 5005, 6005, 7005, 8005, 9005 should be delivered in a top-down breakdown format of the CCFLIR2 and shall include repairable and replacement parts (consumables) and delivery schedule. Each item on the Proposed Spare Parts List shall be priced and available for ordering. The Offeror shall provide a plan for sparing based on the field schedule provided in Section “L” and propose the firm fixed prices associated with spares repairs. This information should link back to the information provided under FACTOR II, Subfactor B. The Proposed Spare Parts List shall contain the part number, nomenclature, CAGE, Quantity, and Unit Price. The below matrix may be tailored.

CLIN 1005, 2005, 3005, 4005 SPARE

QTY RANGE CLIN 1005

YEAR 2

CLIN 2005

YEAR 3

CLIN 3005

YEAR 4

CLIN 4005

YEAR 5

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

11 TO 25 UNITS

26+

CLIN 5005, 6005, 7005, 8005, 9005, SPARE OPTIONs

QTY RANGE CLIN 5005

OPTION 1

YEAR 6

CLIN 6005

OPTION 2

YEAR 7

CLIN 7005

OPTION 3

YEAR 8

CLIN 8005

OPTION 3

YEAR 9

CLIN 9005

OPTION 5

YEAR 10

1 UNIT

2 TO 5 UNITS

6 TO 10 UNITS

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

TWO PHASED APPROACH

a) As specified in the FAR 52.215-1 “Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition” provision, the

Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary.

b) The Government intends to award a contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation. The best value proposal will be selected using a tradeoff process, as defined in FAR 15.101-1, which permits tradeoffs among cost and non-cost factors. Accordingly, the Government may accept other than the lowest cost proposal where the additional benefits of the higher cost proposal merit the additional cost. Conversely, the Government may select a lower-cost, lower rated proposal if the Government determines that the premium associated with the higher-rated proposal is not justified. In making the best value determination, the Government will consider technical merit (e.g. all non-cost factors) to be significantly important than the Government Total Evaluated Price.

However, the importance of Total Evaluated Price calculated by the Government as an evaluation factor will increase with the degree of equality in overall technical merit of competing proposals, under the non-price factors.

c) A proposal must be acceptable for the offeror to be eligible for award. To be eligible for award, Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions and representations and certifications and to provide all information required by Section L of this solicitation. Failure to comply with all the solicitation requirements may result in the Offeror being removed from consideration for award.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS STATED HEREIN MAY BE

DETERMINED UNACCEPTABLE AND MAY BE REJECTED WITHOUT FURTHER

EVALUATION.

d) Offerors must meet the standard for FAR 9.105 for responsibility to be eligible for award. The Government may conduct a Pre-Award Survey as part of this source selection. Results of any survey will be evaluated to determine each Offeror’s capability to meet the requirements of the solicitation. Any such survey may also be used to verify statements and representations made in the Offeror’s proposal. The purpose of a preaward survey is to obtain information not available to the contracting officer to make a responsibility determination prior to contract award.

e) Proposals will be rated on the evaluation factors listed below. It should be noted that cost/price does not have a finite numerical weight. Evaluation factors Factor I and Factor II, and Factor IV when combined, are significantly more important than Factor III. However, cost/price is an important factor and should be considered when preparing proposals. The Government reserves the right to award to a lower cost offeror when the offers are considered essentially equal in terms of technical capability, or when specific strengths and/or benefits associated with a technically superior offer do not support any associated cost or price premium. In summary, cost/price/technical capability tradeoffs will be made.

NOTE: A finding of “Unacceptable” in one technical factor and/or subfactor may result in the entire proposal being determined unacceptable.

f) The source selection process will follow a two phased approach:

Phase I –Product Sample, Written Technical/Logistics Management Proposal, Price and Past

Performance Evaluation Phase II –Evaluation of Test Articles, Written Technical/Logistics Management Proposal, Price and Past Performance Evaluation

g) Up to two (2) vendors may be awarded a contract to deliver test articles (minimum contract quantity 2 each). If more than one contract is awarded Phase 2 of the evaluation will be conducted.

h) Up to three (3) test articles will be purchased by the Government under the first delivery order, and provided by the Contractor for evaluation by Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Crane and USSOCOM personnel against the performance specification identified in the solicitation. All test articles will be tested during the phase II technical evaluation. If one test article should fail, then the second test article shall continue testing from the point of failure of the initial unit. As part of the technical evaluation, laboratory measurements and field tests may be used to determine test article compliance with the performance specification and the offeror’s written proposal.

i) The Government does not anticipate conducting negotiations after test article testing. However, negotiations may be required to address failures of the test articles. If negotiations are required, final proposal revisions will be requested to include only those areas affected by negotiations. Final proposal revisions may include re-pricing of the contract CLINs.

j) A down select to one firm will be performed for the award of subsequent delivery orders under one Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract. Competitors in Phase II will not be authorized to resubmit test articles as a result of negotiations; however the written technical proposal may be revised and submitted as part of a final proposal revision. The SSER will consider any updated written technical proposal as part of a finalized evaluation of the proposal.

k) Written proposals as well as the other factors and subfactors listed below will be evaluated, as applicable, if negotiations resulted in changes, in making the best value determination and resulting in a down select to one contract.

l) Past Performance information may be evaluated upon receipt prior to the closing date of the solicitation.

m) The offeror’s proposal shall be in the format prescribed by, and shall contain a response to, each of the areas identified in Section L. The order of relative importance for the evaluation factors is established as follows:

Technical Capability (Factor I) is significantly more important than Logistics & Management (Factor II).

Technical Capability (Factor I) is significantly more important than Price (Factor III). Technical Capability (Factor I) is significantly more important than Past Performance (Factor IV). Factor II is more important that Factor III and Factor IV. Factor III is more important than Factor IV. Factor I, Factor II, and Factor IV when combined, are significantly more important than Factor III. The price Factor becomes more important as the degree of equality of Factors Other Than Price increases, or when the price is so significantly high as to diminish the value of the technical superiority to the Government.

Under Factor I, Subfactors A, B, and C are listed in descending order of importance. Attachment 03, CCFLIR2 Requirements Ranking, provides the order of importance of the performance specification requirements. Under Factor II, Subfactors A, B, C, D, and E are listed in descending order of importance. Under Factor IV, price will not be rated, but will be considered in determining the "best value" to the Government. Past Performance information may be evaluated upon receipt prior to the closing date of the solicitation.

FACTOR I - Technical Capability SUBFACTORS

A1. Product Sample Capability Evaluation (Phase I) A2. Test Article Evaluation (Phase II) B. Written Performance Specification Compliance &

Objectives Met C. Open Architecture Design

FACTOR II – Logistics & Management SUBFACTORS

A. Warranty B. Life Cycle Maintenance and Repair Plan C. SOW Compliance D. Delivery/Production Schedule E. Subcontracting

FACTOR III – Price

FACTOR IV - Past Performance

n) The best value determination may result in the Government being willing to pay more for higher technical capability.

STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION:

FACTORS I & II-Technical/Logistics & Management Approach

A. PRODUCT SAMPLE (Phase I)

Contractors must show technology maturity by having the following capabilities demonstrated in the Product Sample submitted with the proposal. These capabilities are considered Go/No Go requirements.

1. Continuous Azimuth (AZ) movement

2. Auto-Track

3. Class 1 Eyesafe LRF (LASER Range Finder)

4. Max Class 3B LP (LASER Pointer)

5. Weight not to exceed 65 lb for the sample (Threshold in the performance specification is 56lb)

6. MWIR sensor in the 3-5 µm range

7. Color sensor

8. Require no constant Dry-Air Pressurization

The product sample failing the Go/No Go capabilities may be rejected and both; the product samples, and the written technical proposal, associated with the product sample will not be further evaluated, nor receive further consideration for award. Product samples that successfully pass this initial evaluation will continue with the full evaluation.

As part of the technical evaluation, laboratory measurements and field tests may be used to determine product compliance with the performance specification.

A. TEST ARTICLE EVALUATION (Phase II) Contractors selected for award shall deliver up to three (3) test articles, as required by delivery order 0001.

Operational testing will be conducted on the test articles for conformance to the specification, conformance to the written technical proposal submitted in Phase I, overall image clarity and human factor engineering.

Phase I & II

B. TECHNICAL APPROACH

The technical evaluation will be a subjective assessment of the offeror’s ability to meet the requirements of the technical data package, to include but not be limited to, the specification and statement of work. The evaluation will also consider the successful application of Government and industry standards and best practices and innovative approaches that added value to the project/program and benefitted the Government. The objective of the evaluation is to:

1. develop insight into the offeror’s relative capability and the relative risk associated with contracting with the offeror; and

2. determine the degree to which the offeror has previously encountered the kinds of work, uncertainties, challenges, and risks that it is likely to encounter under the prospective contract.

3. determine which system provides the best technical solution to the Government to meet current and future mission requirements utilizing the CCFLIR2 Requirements Ranking (Attachment 03) .

Each offeror will be evaluated on its capability to perform the requirements and objectives from the performance specification and statement of work based on relevant technical expertise and experience in the proposed functional areas. This shall include the offeror’s depth and breadth of experience performing the type of work covered by the statement of work, the offeror’s ability to perform the requirements, produce systems and sustain the system.

A subcontract participation data form shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section “L”. Evaluation of an offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented concerning the amount of participation of firms designated as part of the socio-economic programs as described in FAR Part 19. Ratings shall be assigned based on the amount of participation when subcontracting opportunities exist.

Each factor and subfactor will be assigned an adjectival rating as follows:

Table 1: Combined Technical/Risk Ratings for Phases I and II

Rating Description Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

Phase I & II

FACTOR III: PRICE

A Cost/Price Proposal shall be submitted for the supplies/services set forth in Section B of this solicitation. The information presented in the Cost/Price Proposal will be evaluated by the Government to determine (i) the extent to which the Offeror understands the Government’s requirements and (ii) what the Government will pay for the required CCFLIR2 systems and sustainment.

Evaluation of an offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented in the proposal and information available to the Contracting Office from sources deemed appropriate. Sources typically considered include Defense Contract Audit Agency office, Defense Contract Management Command, other contracts with the same firms for similar items or services, known commercial sources such as Global Insight Inc. (formally Data Resources, Inc.), Standard and Poor, etc. Proposals which are unrealistic in terms of technical or schedule commitments, or unrealistically high or low in terms of cost/price, may be deemed reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence, or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity of risks of the proposed work and may be grounds for rejection of the proposal. The quality of organization and attention to detail reflected in the business proposal will be considered to be an indication of the quality of organization and level of capability during contract performance. Subjective judgment on the part of the government evaluators is implicit in the entire process.

a) Proposals will be evaluated for price reasonableness. Pricing will be evaluated to determine the overall Total Ownership cost of the system versus just the cost of the system itself. System unit prices, spares and repairs pricing will be evaluated inclusive of the option years. The Government will utilize unit prices proposed for all CLINs multiplied by the estimated delivery order quantities per year, all years summed to develop the Total Evaluated Price.

1) CLINs 0001—Test Article Production (Min 2 each/ Max 3 each) Price offered for year 1 will be multiplied by a quantity of 3 each.

2) CLINs 0002, 1002, 2002, 3002, 4002, 5002, 6002, 7002, 8002, 9002-Production Units (Min 4/Max 58 each) The Government will utilize the estimated ordering quantity per year and apply it to the appropriate quantity price break to establish the evaluated price for the production CCFLIR2. Note: The maximum number of units for the above CLINs is estimated at 58 units. However, based on Government need, the total number of units can exceed this maximum number of units but cannot exceed the total value of the contract.

3) CLINs 0003 - Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) The Government will utilize the amount proposed by the contractor for Non-recurring engineering.

4) CLINs 1004, 2004, 3004, 4004, 5004, 6004, 7004, 8004, 9004-Non-Warranty Repair The Government will utilize the quantities proposed in the repair program provided by the Offeror for each category of non-warranty repair as part of the technical proposal and multiply the plan quantities by the prices proposed for the non-warranty repair category CLINs per year.

5) CLINs 1005, 2005, 3005, 4005, 5005, 6005, 7005, 8005, 9005-Spares The Government will utilize the quantities proposed in the sparing plan provided by the Offeror as part of the technical proposal and multiply the plan quantities by the prices proposed for the spare CLIN per year.

6) CLINs 0006—Training Support Package Price offered for year 1 for required training material will be utilized for evaluation.

7) CLINs 0007, 1007, 2007, 3007, 4007, 5007, 6007, 7007, 8007, 9007—Training (Min 1/Max10)

Price offered for individual training sessions will be multiplied by the estimated ordering quantities per year.

8) CLINs 0008, 1008, 2008, 3008, 4008, 5008, 6008, 7008, 8008, 9008—Installation Kits (Min 4/Max 75) Estimated price offered for installation kits will be multiplied by the estimated ordering quantities per

9) CLINs 0009, 1009, 2009, 3009, 4009, 5009, 6009, 7009, 8009, 9009—Cable Assemblies (Min 4/Max 75) Price offered for spare cable assemblies will be multiplied by the estimated ordering quantities per

10) CLIN 0010—Engineering Services-Labor (Not-to-Exceed (NTE)) The government will apply a total Not-to-Exceed (NTE) amount of $5M to all proposals for engineering services.

11) CLIN 0011---Travel (Not-to-Exceed (NTE)) The Government will apply a total Not-to-Exceed (NTE) amount of $150,000 to all proposals for travel associated to CLIN 0010.

12) CLIN 0012--Non-Technical Data (Not Seperately Priced (NSP)) Data CLINs are not separately priced and will not be evaluated separately for price reasonableness.

PHASE I & II

FACTOR IV: PAST PERFORMANCE

The Government will assess each offeror’s and proposed significant subcontractor’s past performance. The assessment will be an unbiased judgment about the quality of an offeror’s past performance. The Government will use its subjective assessment to make a comparative assessment of an offeror’s capability. The Government will consider the offeror's record of conforming to specifications/commercial product descriptions and to standards of good workmanship; the offeror's adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; the offeror's record of managing subcontractor delivery and performance; the offeror's record of controlling costs under cost-type contracts; the offeror's record of number and type of change orders under similar contracts; the offeror's reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction;

and, generally, the offeror's business-like concern for the interests of the customer. Past performance is also a measure of the risk of performance associated with the offeror.

The assessment of the offeror's performance will be used as one means of evaluating the credibility of the offeror's proposal. A record of marginal or unacceptable past performance may be considered an indication that the ability of the contractor to perform the contract as proposed may be questionable. This increased performance risk may be reflected in the overall assessment of the offeror's proposal.

The assessment of the offeror's past performance will be used as one means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror and other competitors to meet the performance requirements of the proposed contract. Thus, an offeror with an exceptional record of past performance may receive a more favorable assessment than another whose record is acceptable, even though both may have otherwise equally acceptable proposals.

Assessment of past performance will be a subjective assessment based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. It will not be based on absolute standards of acceptable performance. The Government is seeking to determine whether the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of quality goods and services at fair and reasonable prices. This is a matter of judgment. The Government may base its judgment about the quality of an offeror’s past performance on:

(1) Records of objective measurements and subjective ratings of specified performance attributes, if available, and

(2) Statements of opinion about the quality of specific aspects of an offeror’s performance, or about the quality of an offeror’s overall performance.

In addition to the sources identified by the offeror, the Government may review Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and/or DOD Past Performance Information Retrieval System ratings and other existing past performance ratings on relevant contracts. In addition, information obtained from other sources, such as past and present customers, cognizant contract administration offices, other Government agencies (including state and local Governments), consumer protection organizations, better business bureaus, and others who may have useful information. General trends in a contractor’s past performance will also be considered.

The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact and to contact references other than those provided by the offeror. The evaluation will take in account the same type of information regarding significant subcontractors proposed in the offeror’s proposal.

The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or securing any information not furnished with the offer.

The SSA/Contracting Officer may, however, utilize all available information, including information not provided by the offeror, in the past performance evaluation. The Government reserves the right to review less than all information submitted, and to only analyze sufficient information to make a reasonable determination of each offeror’s past performance rating. If insufficient information regarding the offeror’s corporate history is available, the offeror is encouraged to submit for evaluation, evidence of relevant past performance on the part of the offeror’s key/principal employees, as either a prime- or sub-contractor.

If discussions are held, offerors will be given an opportunity to address especially unfavorable reports of past performance for which they have not previously been provided an opportuity to comment and the offeror's response, or lack thereof, will be taken into consideration. In particular, recent contracts will be examined to ensure that corrective measures have been put in place to prevent the reoccurrence of past performance problems. Prompt actions taken to correct performance problems will be a reflection of management concern for customer satisfaction;

however, such action may not mitigate all negative performance trends.

Past performance is assessed by the SSA/Contracting Officer and is assigned adjectival ratings in the evaluation.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation:

Relevancy - The past performance relevancy rating, as defined in the table below, is the assessment of the offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract's requirements.

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATING

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Confidence - The past performance confidence rating, as defined in the table below, is the evaluation of the offeror’s demonstrated ability to successfully perform the contract’s requirements, based on past performance information.

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Offerors that have no record of past performance (i.e., new businesses) must submit a signed and dated statement to that effect. If an offer submits a certification statement and the Government has no information available regarding the offeror’s past performance, that offeror will receive a neutral rating (i.e., the offeror is evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably) for past performance. If offerors (prime and significant subcontractors) provide reference information that is deemed not relevant and current as defined in Section L, the offeror will receive a neutral past performance rating for those contracts.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

HQ J-2-0002 CONTRACT LANGUAGE FOR SECTION J

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this contract:

Contract Data Requirements List, DD Form 1423 – Exhibits A001-A025 , 25, page(s);

CDRL # DI Title DI Number SubTitle

A001 Test Procedure DI-NDTI-80603A Acceptance Test Procedure

A002 Quality Inspection Test, Demonstration, and Evaluation Report

DI-QCIC-81200 ATP Results

A003 Interface Control Document (ICD) DI-CMAN-81248A Hardware Interface Control Drawings

A004 Interface Control Document (ICD) DI-CMAN-81248A Software Interface Control Drawings

A005 Commercial Drawings/Models and Associated Lists

DI-SESS-81003E Install Kit Drawings/Models and Associated L

A006 Interface Control Document (ICD) DI-CMAN-81248A Cable Kit ICD

A007 Conference Agenda DI-ADMN-81249A Post Award Conference

A008 Conference Agenda DI-ADMN-81249A Semi-Annual Status Review

A009 Presentation Material DI-ADMN-81373 Semi-Annual Conference Material

A010 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes DI-ADMN-81505 Semi-Annual Record of Meeting/Minutes

A011 Contractor's Progress, Status, and Management Report

DI-MGMT-80227 Monthly Program Status

A012 Technical Data Package DI-SESS-80776A Preventative Maintenance Schedule

A013 Contractor's Configuration Management Plan DI-SESS-80858B Configuration Management Program

A014 Engineering Change Proposal DI-CMAN-80639C Class I ECP

A015 Engineering Change Proposal DI-CMAN-80639C Class II ECP

A016 Notice of Revision (NOR) DI-CMAN-80642C Notice of Revision

A017 Request for Deviation (RFD) DI-CMAN-80640C Request for Deviation

A018 Configuration Status Accounting Information DI-CMAN-81253A Configuration Status Accounting Info, As Buil

A019 Integrated Logistics Support Plan DI-ILSS-80095 Inegrated Logistics Support Plan

A020 Failure Analysis Summary List DI-SESS-80374 Failure Analysis

A021 Training Materials DI-ILSS-80872 Training Material

A022 Training Materials DI-ILSS-80872 Operator and Maintainer Tech Manual

A023 Technical Report-Study/Services DI-MISC-80508B Tech Bulletin

A024 Commercial Drawings/Models and Associated DI-SESS-81003E Packaging/Shipping Container Drawings

Lists, Commercial Drawings

A025 Software Test Plan DI-IPS-81438A Software Regression Test Plan

Statement of Work – Attachment 1, 15, page(s);

Performance Specification – Attachment 2, 36, page(s);

CCFLIR2 Requirements Rankings – Attachment 3, 2 page(s);

Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254 – Attachment 4, 2, page(s);

Appendix A Detection, Recognition and Identification Range Requirements, Appendix B Signature Requirements – Attachment 5, 16 page(s) (CLASSIFIED)

Past Performance Matrix- Attachment 6, 4 page(s)

Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 7, 4 page(s)

Small Business Participation Data – Attachment 8, 1 page(s)

RFP Classified Material Request Form – Attachment 9, 1 page(s)

OPNAVINST 5513.15E N09N2 ID 15-07.01, NSW Surface Mobility Craft – Attachment 10, 5 page(s) provided with attachment 5

OPNAVINST 5513.15E N09N2 ID 15-15.1, Signature Reduction Technologies – Attachment 11, 6 page(s) provided with attachment 5

Labor Rate Price Matrix – Attachment 12, 1 page

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

CNIN-L-0002 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS – BEST VALUE (Jun 2014)

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

A complete proposal will include the following:

Document / Information Volume Number Signed RFP with Amendments and a cover letter.

(1) hard copy and 1 CD-ROM)

Volume I

Technical Approach—Factor I (4 hard copies and 12 CD-ROMs)

Volume II-Factor I (65 page limit)

Logistics Management Volume – Factor II (4 hard copies and 12 CD-ROMs)

Volume II-Factor II (50 page limit)

Pricing/Cost Proposal (1 hard copy and 1 CD-ROM (read-only) and 1 CD-ROM (read-write))

Volume III-Factor III (No page limit)

Past Performance Summaries & Matrix (2 hard copies and 2 CD-ROMs)

Volume IV-Factor IV (Min 3, Max 5 references) (15 page limit) (Matrix-Attachment 6)

General Information:

a) For proposal purposes the estimated date of contract award is 15 AUGUST 2015. All proposals shall be valid through 30 September 2015.

b) Access to classified information is required to respond to this solicitation and will be provided to prospective respondents upon verification of the appropriate facility clearance and safeguarding capability.

Individuals requesting access to the classified material shall complete Attachment 9, RFP Classified Material Request Form and submit to Rebecca Lingenfelter at rebecca.lingenfelter@navy.mil. Provide your name, title, phone number, cage code, and classified mailing address to include your security POC.

The Government will mail the document(s) to the provided classified mailing address/POC following verification of your facility clearance status. Companies that do not hold the required facility clearance will be denied via email. The classified documents provide pertinent information and must be obtained.

Proposals received from offerors that do not possess Attachment 5 (Appendix A Detection, Recognition and Identification Range Requirements and Appendix B Signature Requirements of PS/15/JXQQL/129), will not be considered. Responses to the solicitation may be either classified or unclassified and must be marked and transmitted accordingly.

c) COVER LETTER: The proposal shall include a cover letter signed by an individual authorized to commit the company to the proposal. The cover letter shall be submitted with Volume I. The cover letter shall identify all enclosures being transmitted as part of the proposal. The letter shall reference the solicitation number and acknowledge that it transmits an offer in response to the solicitation. The cover letter required by this paragraph super cedes and replaces the “First Page” requirements referred to in FAR 52.215-1, Subsection (c)(2). It shall state

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number, Duns Number, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), Name, address and telephone number of the cognizant DCMA Office (can be found at http://www.dcma.mil/ ) Proposal validity through 30 September 2015.

Identify all enclosures being transmitted Names, telephone numbers and email addresses of persons authorized to conduct negotiations, as well as the names of the official authorized to bind the offeror’s organization shall be clearly identified, Any exceptions taken to any requirements of the solicitation, to include but not be limited to technical exceptions, clauses and or provisions. The cover letter shall indicate in which volume and on what page of the offeror’s proposal the exception is addressed.

A copy of the offerors SAM registration information from the SAM website. This does not count towards the page limitation of the cover letter.

The date that the cognizant DCAA office has determined the offeror’s accounting system to be adequate for the accumulation, reporting, and billing of costs under cost reimbursement contracts or contracts with progress payments. Offerors shall also state if they have an established electronic invoice process in place. A copy of the SF1408 from DCAA and/or a copy of DCAA Audit Report should be included as an attachment to your proposal’s cover letter and also does not count toward page limitation.

NOTE: Since there are firm fixed price CLINs included in this solicitation, a DCAA approved accounting system is not required to be eligible for award of a prime contract. However, successful awardees would not be eligible to receive progress payments, or a cost type delivery order until DCAA has determined that their accounting system is adequate. The Government will initiate requests for accounting system reviews for any successful offeror that does not currently have an approved system after awards have been made from this solicitation. Documentation will be provided to the successful awardees that will need to be completed and returned to the Government before the audit request can be initiated. Financial capability reviews are now being conducted by DCMA instead of DCAA. Documentation for this review will need to be provided to DCMA upon request. This will be required after award has been made so no submission is required with the current proposal.

d) The solicitation shall require the receipt and review of classified information. Proposal volumes shall not contain classified information. Classified appendices shall be submitted as a material part of the proposal IAW the attached DD254 as follows:

Submission of Classified Appendicies

The Government anticipates the need for bidders to submit classified information as part of their proposal.

Classified proposals must be appropriately marked and delivered in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). The NISPOM can be accessed at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/522022m.pdf.

Volumes I through IV shall contain NO CLASSIFIED MATERIAL UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE and shall be marked as unclassified. In the event classified information is found within the unclassified sections of the proposal, that section will be destroyed and not evaluated. The Offeror will be financially responsible for damages caused by incorrectly classifying or marking classified information that contaminate a Government network. The Proposal Volume to which a Classified Appendix applies shall be identified on the Cover Page of the appendix. Each entry in the Classified Appendix shall be referenced to the proposal volume, page number, and paragraph number to which it applies. Similarly, a reference shall be placed in the unclassified volume where the classified insert applies, giving the page and paragraph numbers within the appendix where it can be found. Classified pages will count against the page limits and format restrictions previously defined unless the data/information provided is exempted from the page count below. Classified test data will not count toward the page limit. The classified appendices shall be wrapped separately from the unclassified portions of the proposal, and submitted under separate cover in accordance with NISPOM guidelines. The classified appendices wrapping shall be prominently marked on all sides as to the classification level of the material contained therein. The following procedures shall be followed:

Cross-referencing between the Classified Appendices and the Unclassified Volume II is encouraged.

The Classified Appendices shall not exceed the classification GENSER Secret.

The Classified Appendices shall be appropriately marked on the front, back, and spine as to the highest level of classified material contained therein.

Page, paragraph, table, graphic, and figure markings shall be in accordance with the National

Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM).

Strict adherence protocols to the Security Classification Guide (SCG) and the DD-254 Attachment

4 shall be in place to determine if any portion of the Offeror's proposal is classified. In cases where the DD-254 Attachment 4 and SCG differ, the SCG takes precedence.

Classified information and the Classified Annex shall be handled, packed, and shipped or delivered in accordance with and shall conform to the instructions contained in the DD-254 Attachment 4, the Security Classification Guide (SCG), and the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM).

e) The Government may evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a technical and price standpoint. The

Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

f) Failure to submit any of the information requested by this solicitation may be cause for unfavorable consideration.

g) Solicitation information and amendments will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at www.fbo.gov. Offerors may e-mail written questions requesting clarification of the RFP to the Government via the Contract Specialist, Rebecca Lingenfelter, at: Rebecca.lingenfelter@navy.mil. The Government will answer questions received up to 14 days prior to the closing date of the RFP and will provide responses to interested parties via an amendment to the solicitation. Questions received after this date may not be answered.

h) Delivery& Submission Method

1) NSWC Crane will NOT accept facsimile proposals or proposals submitted via Navy Electronic

Business Opportunities (NECO) site.

2) Hand delivered proposals will NOT be accepted. All offers must be mailed via USPS or by overnight courier. If using an overnight courier, it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the courier service has access to NSWC Crane. Only approved couriers will be given access to the base to make delivery.

3) Delivery of Product Sample: Product sample for the item indicated in this solicitation is required and must be furnished as part of the offer. The sample must be received on or before the time set forth for receipt of offers noted in Block 9 of page 1 of this solicitation. The sample is to be delivered to the following address:

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

M/F: DONNA STEWARD (BLDG 3291)

BLDG 3291

300 HWY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

Please notify the Contract Specialist at rebecca.lingenfelter@navy.mil and provide a copy of the shipping label

4) Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Unclassified Proposals. Mailed or commercially delivered hard or soft copy proposals shall be sent to the address in Block 7 of SF33, Page 1 of the Solicitation and must be received by the date and time in Block 9 on Page 1 of the solicitation, or as amended. Please notify the Contract Specialist at rebecca.lingenfelter@navy.mil and provide a copy of the shipping label.

5) Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Classified Appendices. Mailed or commercially delivered hard or softy copy Classified…