15RGS46_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to clarify the requirements of the contract. The solicitation w ill be extended to close on 8 October 2015 at

4:00 PM.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Sep-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-15-R-GS46

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Sep-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 2 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Sep-2015

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

ELLEN.MCDANIEL@NAVY.MIL

E.MCDANIEL (812-854-5315) BLG 121

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-15-R-GS46

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. Page 15.

The minimum and maximum for the contract has been changed as follows:

TO:

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

1 of each of the 15 identifiable CLINs/cables

800 of each of the 15 identifiable CLINs/cables

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

1.00 200.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

0001 0

0002 * 0

800 $

0003 0

0004 0 $

0005 0

0006 0 $

0007 0

0008 0 $

0009 0

0010 0 $

0011 0

0012 0 $

0013 0

0014 0 $

0015 0 $

0016 0 $

0017 0

0018 0 $

0019 0

0020 0 $

0021 0

0022 0 $

0023 0

0024 0 $

0025 0

0026 0

0027 0

0028 0 $

0029 0

0030 0 $

NOTE: * For the even numbered CLINs above, if first articles for a CLIN are waived, then the minimum for this CLIN will become 1.

In addition, In the CLIN descriptions for even numbered CLINs in Section B, pages 2‐13, the minimum should be stated as 0, instead of 1. If first articles are waived, the minimum for the even number CLINs will become 1.

2. Page 20 and 21. The language above the price matrix has changed.

TO:

Contractors are required to fill out the price above in Section B for odd‐numbered CLINS(1 each) and contractors must submit their pricing in the price matrix below for even numbered CLINS(production units). Please submit pricing for all priced CLINs.

OFFER A AND OFFER B‐ Either Offer A or Offer B will be awarded to one vendor. One award will be made.

Offer A ‐ An award under Offer A consists of award of CLINS 0001‐0032.

Offer B ‐ An award under Offer B consists of award of even numbered CLINs 0002‐0032 and odd numbered CLINs that have NOT been waived. Please submit pricing in the matrix below for Offer B.

Each Offer A or B will be required to deliver data under CLIN 0031.

3. Page 27

The following note is added under HQ‐C‐2‐0062:

With your proposal, please identify by CLIN and contract under which it was manufactured.

4. Page 80: CNIN‐L‐0011 – I – Technical Capability is changed as follows:

FROM :

I. Technical Capability

a) Offerors shall not include any pricing within Volume 1.

b) Offerors shall identify any “exceptions” to the Specifications, Drawings, and Statement of Work and state precisely how the offered supplies/services differ from the solicitation documents.

c) Offerors SHALL include:

i. A statement that provided the approximate percentage that this contract will be in comparison to overall workload (production capacity)

ii. Provide testing methods used to comply with Statement of Work paragraph 3.3.4.

NOTE: Without this information, the Offeror may be deemed unacceptable and may not considered be for further evaluation.

d) Offerors shall enable Government evaluators to thoroughly evaluate and determine if the proposal will meet the requirements.

e) Offerors shall be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements.

f) Offerors shall not paraphrase the specifications/Statement of Work or attest that "standard procedures will be employed.” This is inadequate to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the requirements of the specification/Statement of Work.

II. Technical Capability

g) Offerors shall not include any pricing within Volume 1.

h) Offerors shall identify any “exceptions” to the Specifications, Drawings, and Statement of Work and state precisely how the offered supplies/services differ from the solicitation documents.

i) Offerors SHALL include:

i. Detailed Description of how the requirements of Section 3 plus Section 5.1.2 of the SOW will be met.

ii. Provide testing methods used to comply with Statement of Work paragraph 3.3.4.

NOTE: Without this information, the Offeror may be deemed unacceptable and may not considered be for further evaluation.

j) Offerors shall enable Government evaluators to thoroughly evaluate and determine if the proposal will meet the requirements.

k) Offerors shall be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements.

l) Offerors shall not paraphrase the specifications/Statement of Work or attest that "standard procedures will be employed.” This is inadequate to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the requirements of the specification/Statement of Work.

5. Page 85 - CNIN-M-0011 - the capitalized language under the Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings is changed as followed:

FROM:

IF AN OFFEROR RECEIVES A TECHNICAL RATING LESS THAN “ACCEPTABLE”, THE GOVERNMENT

MAY NOT RATE THE OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE AS THE OFFEROR MAY NOT BE

CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

TO:

IF AN OFFEROR RECEIVES A TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF UNACCEPTABLE/NO-G0, THE

GOVERNMENT WILL NOT EVALUATE THE OFFEROR'S PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION OR

PRICE INFORMATION.

6. Page 87 – CNIN-M-0011 - The section 3. PRICE - has changed as follows:

FROM :

3. PRICE

Evaluation of an offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented in the proposal and information available to the Contracting Office from sources deemed appropriate. Sources typically considered include Defense Contract Audit Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency, other contracts with the same firms for similar items or services, known commercial sources such as Global Insight Inc. (formally Data Resources, Inc.), Standard and Poor, etc. Proposals which are unrealistic in terms of technical or schedule commitments may be deemed reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence, or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity of risks of the proposed work and may be grounds for rejection of the proposal. The quality of organization and attention to detail reflected in the business proposal will be considered to be an indication of the quality of organization and level of capability during contract performance. Subjective judgment on the part of the Government evaluators is implicit in the entire process.

Price: A Cost/Price Proposal shall be submitted for the supplies/services set forth in Section B of this solicitation.

Evaluation of an offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented in the proposal and information available to the Contracting Office from sources deemed appropriate. Sources typically considered include Defense Contract Audit Agency office, Defense Contract Management Command, other contracts with the same firms for similar items or services, known commercial sources such as Global Insight Inc. (formally Data Resources, Inc.), Standard and Poor, etc. Proposals which are unrealistic in terms of technical or schedule commitments, or unrealistically high or low in terms of cost/price, may be deemed reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence, or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity of risks of the proposed work and may be grounds for rejection of the proposal. The quality of organization and attention to detail reflected in the business proposal will be considered to be an indication of the quality of organization and level of capability during contract performance. Subjective judgment on the part of the government evaluators is implicit in the entire process.

(a) Proposals will be evaluated for price reasonableness. Cost/Price evaluation will be based on the total cost offered for all line items. Estimated ordering quantities will be used to develop an evaluated total price for the comparison to the government estimate, when applicable, and other offers in the competitive range.

An award under Offer A (first articles required) consists of award of CLINS 0001-0032. An award under Offer B (first articles waived), consists of award of even numbered CLINS 0002-0032

For evaluation purposes, CLINs 0002-0030 (Offer A and B- even numbers) is calculated:

Average Unit Price Per Year = Sum of the Unit Prices per Year Divided by number of step ladders (see below).

Year 1 Average Unit Price Year 2 Average Unit Price Year 3 Average Unit Price Year 4 Average Unit Price Year 5 Average Unit Price

Total Unit Price / 5 = Average Unit Price

Average Unit Price for each CLIN X Estimated Quantity to purchase per year = Evaluated Price per CLIN

Sum of all CLIN Evaluated Prices

Offer A will include the total evaluated prices for CLINs 0001-0032. Offer B will include the total evaluated price for CLINs 0002-0032 ( even numbered CLINs).

Contract Data is “Not Separately Priced”.

3. PRICE

Evaluation of an offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented in the proposal and information available to the Contracting Office from sources deemed appropriate. Sources typically considered include Defense Contract Audit Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency, other contracts with the same firms for similar items or services, known commercial sources such as Global Insight Inc. (formally Data Resources, Inc.), Standard and Poor, etc. Proposals which are unrealistic in terms of technical or schedule commitments may be deemed reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence, or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity of risks of the proposed work and may be grounds for rejection of the proposal. The quality of organization and attention to detail reflected in the business proposal will be considered to be an indication of the quality of organization and level of capability during contract performance. Subjective judgment on the part of the Government evaluators is implicit in the entire process.

(b) Proposals will be evaluated for price reasonableness. Cost/Price evaluation will be based on the total cost offered for all line items. Estimated ordering quantities will be used to develop an evaluated total price for the comparison to the government estimate, when applicable, and other offers in the competitive range.

An award under Offer A consists of award of CLINS 0001-0032. An award under Offer B, consists of award of even numbered CLINS 0002-0032 and odd numbered CLINs that have not been waived.

For evaluation purposes, CLINs 0002-0030 (Offer A and B- even numbers) is calculated:

Average Unit Price Per Year = Sum of the Unit Prices per Year Divided by number of step ladders (see below).

Year 1 Average Unit Price Year 2 Average Unit Price Year 3 Average Unit Price Year 4 Average Unit Price Year 5 Average Unit Price

Total Unit Price / 5 = Average Unit Price

Average Unit Price for each CLIN X Estimated Quantity to purchase per year = Evaluated Price per CLIN

Sum of all even CLIN Evaluated Prices

Offer A will include the total evaluated prices for CLINs 0001-0032. Offer B will include the total evaluated price for CLINs 0002-0032 ( even numbered CLINs), plus prices for first article CLINs that have NOT been waived.

Contract Data is “Not Separately Priced”.