N0010426Q19764 Submission Instructions and Evaluation Criteria.docx

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION

N0010426RX19764

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION

Offers shall be emailed to Dayna O’Brien at dayna.k.obrien.civ@us.navy.mil. Vendors will be required to submit a quote that will be evaluated in accordance with the specifications provided in this request-for-quote.

System for Award Management (SAM): Vendors must be registered in the SAM database to be considered for award. Registration is free and can be completed on-line at http://www.sam.gov/.

Technical Confidence Submission:

Vendors must provide the following:

i) Applicable Non-Destructive Testing procedures written by the Party to be conducting them:

(1) Ultrasonic Testing Procedure in accordance with MIL-STD-2132D (including acceptance criteria per MIL-DTL-32386), and

(2) Applicable Liquid Penetrant Test Procedure in accordance with MIL-STD-2132D (including acceptance criteria per MIL-DTL-32386); and

ii) Provide evidence of compliance with the Higher-Level Contracting Quality Requirements of (1) MIL- I-45208 or (2) ISO 9001/9002 with STR-ISO 9000 Supplement A, or B, or C.

Delivery Schedule:

Offerors must indicate whether they minimally meet the requested delivery schedule of 50 weeks after receipt of order. If no offeror can meet the requested delivery schedule, the Contracting Officer may decide to resolicit under revised delivery terms.

Price:

Please provide your lowest pricing terms for the items being requested.

Past Performance:

The Contracting Officer will utilize any available information, public or otherwise, to evaluate Vendor Responsibility. The vendor should include in their proposal submission at least three (3) previous projects or contracts for the Vendor and any subcontractors that have been performed within the last five (5) years and are relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. The Government will only evaluate projects or contracts that have been performed.

EVALUATION

The Government will award a delivery order resulting from this solicitation to the responsible vendor whose quote offers the best value to the government. Quotes will be evaluated based on the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA):

1. Technical Capability

2. Delivery Schedule

3. Price

4. Past Performance

Technical Capability:

Technical Capability Confidence Ratings

Acceptable

The Offeror has provided the following:

i) Technically acceptable Non-Destructive Testing; and

ii) Evidence of compliance with the Higher Level Contracting Quality Requirements of (1) MIL-I-45208 or (2) ISO 9001/9002 with STR- ISO 9000 Supplement A, or B, or C.

Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s lack of acceptable technical data, the Government has an unacceptably low level of confidence as to whether the Offeror may be technically capable of successfully performing the required effort.

Delivery Schedule:

The Government seeks to award to a vendor that can meet its requested production schedule.

Delivery Schedule Ratings

The Offeror’s quote proposes the ability to meet the requested delivery schedule

The Offeror’s proposed Delivery schedule does not meet the schedule requested by Government

Price:

Pricing data will be evaluated as Lowest Price Technically Acceptable. Failure to include pricing for all line items shall be cause for rejection of the quote for all line items.

Past Performance:

The Government will consider vendor responsibility information obtained from sources including Federal, State and local Government agencies, better business bureaus, published media and electronic databases including, but not limited to, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), the Product Data Reporting and

Evaluation Program (PDREP), and the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) in order to determine whether a vendor’s past performance information indicates potential risk to delivery under this contract. Vendors with no past performance information in the systems will be rated as “Acceptable”. A vendor that receives an “Unacceptable” rating will no longer be considered for further competition or award

Past Performance Confidence Ratings

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has reasonable confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has an unacceptable lack of confidence as to whether the Offeror may be able to successfully perform the required effort.

· Recent is any contract or project that has been performed within five (5) years, measured from the date this solicitation was issued. Information that fails to meet this condition will not be evaluated

· Relevant is defined as any contractor or project that is similar in scope and complexity to this effort

· Scope: Measures the similarity between the Past Performance information and requirements or tasks to be performed in the solicited effort.

· Complexity: Measures the similarity of technical and managerial intricacy and required coordination and disciplines between the Past Performance information and the solicited effort.

(End of Submission Instructions and Evaluation Factors)