N0010418F0N45_N0010418RF026_(ASP-2380)_Final_JA_Redacted.pdf

Justification for Other Than Full & Open Competition

5450 Carlisle Pike | PO Box 2020 | Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0788

NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

C1 J&A V2.0

Manual

Folder #

PD#

1700047390

Item Manager's Name

Jeff Livelsberger

Technician's Name

Benjamin Canilang

Buyer's Name

Royce Hoffman

Code

N962

Code

NAVSEA 05Z23

Code

N743.32

1. CONTRACTING ACTIVITY: NAVSUP WSS Mechanicsburg

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION BEING APPROVED:

Negotiation and award of a contract through other than full & open competition

3. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES: This J&A covers the acquisition of the following Spares Repair/Overhaul Modification Management Piece Parts Data Reporting

Nomen: 501-K34 Gas Turbine Engine Repair and Overhaul

NSN: 2S 2835 012587176

P/N: 23031310

Quantity: 1EA

CAGE Code: 1W5D9

Unit Price:

Estimated Value (including any/all options):

Required Delivery Date Opt. % DAYSOpt. N

Ship To:SW3205 DLA DISTRIBUTION SAN DIEGO NORTH ISLAND FACILITY RODGERS ROAD BLDG 656-1 SAN DIEGO, CA 92135

Line of Accounting

List / Description of items:

501-K34 Gas Turbine Engine Repair and Overhaul

4. STATUTORY AUTHORITY PERMITTING OTHER THAN FULL & OPEN COMPETITION: This J&A is based upon the authority of 10 USC 2304(c) (1), only one or a limited number of responsible sources will satisfy agency requirements, as implemented by FAR 6.302-1

5. RATIONALE JUSTIFYING USE OF CITED AUTHORITY:

The current Acquisition/Repair Method/Suffix Code(s) is (are)

0. The part was not assigned AMC/RMC 1 through 5 when it entered the inventory, nor has it ever completed screening.

1. Suitable for competitive acquisition for the second or subsequent time.

2. Suitable for competitive acquisition for the first time.

3. Acquire, for the second or subsequent time, directly from the actual manufacturer

4. Acquire, for the first time, directly from the actual manufacturer.

5. Acquire directly from a sole source contractor which is not the actual manufacturer

C

C. This part requires engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part. Existing unique design capability, engineering skills, and manufacturing/repair knowledge by the qualified source(s) require acquisition/repair of the part from the approved source(s). The approved source(s) retain data rights, manufacturing/repair knowledge, or technical data that are not economically available to the Government, and the data or knowledge is essential to maintaining the quality of the part. An alternate source must qualify in accordance with the design control activity's procedures, as approved by the cognizant Government engineering activity. The qualification procedures must be approved by the Government engineering activity having jurisdiction over the part in the intended application. If one source is approved, A/RMCs 3, 4, or 5 are valid. If at least two sources are approved or if data is adequate for an alternate source to qualify in accordance with the design control activity's procedures, A/RMCs 1 or 2 are valid.

Multiple Method Codes

This acquisition will be negotiated with

RWG (Repair and Overhauls) USA, Inc.

The above source provided the previous repair under a separate contract. After the engine was repaired, it failed at an operating hour status significantly below the required 15,000 operating hours. Consequently, the engine was returned to the original repair source for a root cause determination. In performance of the root cause analysis, the repair vendor dissembled the engine to the piece part level.

While disassembled, the vendor (at the request of the Government) removed the Turbine Inlet Casing, returned it to the Government, and received a replacement separately packaged Turbine Inlet Casing. Lastly, the vendor concluded that the low time engine failure was not the fault of the repair facility. Based on the foregoing information there is sufficient basis to conclude that only the above supplier can meet the Governments needs without substantial duplication of time and costs, and the Government must procure the repair of this item through the above mentioned source of supply.

6. DESCRIPTION OF EFFORTS MADE TO SOLICIT OFFERS FROM AS MANY OFFERORS AS PRACTICABLE: A Request for Information / Sources Sought Notice was entered on the FedBizOpps website for government-wide point of entry on

22 March 2018 and as a result

The proposed contract action was synopsized on the FedBizOpps website for government-wide point of entry on

28 March 2018 and as a result

Market Research was conducted in accordance with FAR Part 10. The results of the Market Research conducted (or the reason(s) Market Research was not conducted) are as follows:

An In-Service Engineering Activity (ISEA) technical review was conducted and a sources sought notice was published to identify all additional sources or interested vendors. The results of this market research indicate that only the above-named vendor are able to meet the government's requirements.

7. DETERMINATION OF FAIR AND REASONABLE COST:

The contracting officer determines that the anticipated cost to the Government of the supplies covered by this J&A will be fair and reasonable based on price and or cost analysis.

8. ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO FUTURE COMPETITION:

Future requirements for this repair will be synopsized and evaluated to see if the material can be procured on a competitive basis. This item will be reviewed under the NSWC Philadelphia 2SCOG/GT Life Cycle Support Branch to determine if competitive repair is opportunities exist. Any vendor expressing an interest in manufacturing this item will be referred to NSWC Philadelphia for further instructions.

Previous J&A No Previous J&A - see reasoning below

Previous J&As were processed as Class J&As for a BOA.

9. REFERENCE TO THE APPROVED ACQUISITION PLAN:

A Pre-Solicitation Strategy Form is required for this acquisition

CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

Technical Cognizance:

Requirements Cognizance:

COMPETITION ADVOCATE (NAVY) REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE

APPROVAL REQUIRED BY FAR 6.304

Contracting Officer Competition Advocate Head of the Contracting Activity

ASN (RD&A) / DLA SPE

$150,000 - $700,000:

Over $700,000 - $13,500,000:

Over $13,500,000 - $93,000,000:

Over $93,000,000:

FAR 6.304 Approval Levels:

Sig

Si

Signature

Signature

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW

Signature

I have determined this J&A is legally sufficient

CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Si

I certify that this J&A is accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

CANILANG.BENJAMIN.D.

LIVELSBERGER.JEFFREY.A.

JOHNSON.ADAM.LEE.

MILLER.KIMBERLY.A.

JOHNSON.NICHOLOUS.RUFUS