PMS 300 SCB MAC Industry Day 302-2025.pdf

Service Craft & Boats Multiple Award Contract (MAC)

Overview 10 Dec 2025

Matt Warncke Assistant Program Manager

PEO USC/PMS 300G

U.S. Navy and Foreign Military Sales Boats & Craft Program Office

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 1

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited

• Today’s Industry Day is informational only.

• Nothing stated verbally by Government personnel constitutes direction, evaluation, or a commitment.

• The written solicitation and all amendments posted to SAM.gov are the only official documents governing this acquisition.

• If verbal comments appear inconsistent with the solicitation, the written solicitation controls.

• All questions must be submitted in Questionnaire directed in the Special Notice.

• Participation is voluntary and does not affect a company’s ability to compete.

• Check in the Chat Window by typing your:

• Company Name

• First and Last Name Point of Contact

• POC Email

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER

Industry Day Communications Disclaimer

Legacy PMS 300 Approach:

• Historically awarded single-award, multi-year, multi-option, Firm Fixed Price

(FFP) Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts for each boat type

• Typically structured for 1–200+ boats over 3–5+ years

• Long acquisition lead time (Request for Proposal (RFP) development, staffing, reviews, legal, etc.)

• Limited vendor participation once awarded

Why the Service Craft and Boats (SCB) Multiple Award Contract (MAC)?

• The MAC IDIQ structure is intended to streamline contracting actions and support more efficient release of Delivery Order solicitations and awards.

• Enables parallel competition among multiple vendors across different DOs

• A multi-award structure encourages broad participation, including small businesses, while enabling competition among both new entrants and experienced performers.

• The MAC framework permits the potential use of options on Delivery Orders, when appropriate, to reduce administrative burden while complying with competition requirements.

Transitioning to the SCB MAC From Single-Award IDIQs to a Flexible MAC Structure

Faster path to award = faster path to production = better outcomes for the Fleet and industry

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER

Delivery Orders may include base quantities with optional quantities, as appropriate. Final DO structures will be defined in future RFDOPs.

• The Government anticipates grouping requirements when appropriate; however, final RFDOP release structures will be determined based on program needs.

The MAC structure is intended to support predictability and production continuity; actual award timing will depend on program requirements and available funding.

Pricing Flexibility Under the MAC Structure

• Unlike multi-year FFP IDIQs that lock in pricing at the contract level, the MAC allows vendors to:

o Submit updated pricing during each delivery order proposal o Reflect current market conditions, labor/material costs, and evolving technologies o This approach reduces the risk of outdated or front-loaded bids and supports more realistic pricing over time o Note that specific solicitation terms are set for in the MAC and defined further in each RFDOP.

• Why it matters o Encourages realistic budgeting and sustained competitive pricing.

o Allows both new and incumbent vendors to compete using current pricing.

o Supports both the Government and industry in changing cost environments.

Transitioning to the SCB MAC Predictable Delivery, Flexible Pricing

Acquisition Objective

• Contract ceiling currently planned at up to ~$3.5B, subject to Acquisition Plan approval.

• A notional two-lot structure (Small Business Set-Aside and Full & Open Competition) is under consideration pending Acquisition Plan approval.

Lot 1 – Structure 1:

Notional scope includes new construction of small aluminum and/or steel craft.

Illustrative examples: patrol craft, maneuvering targets, service craft

Lot 2 – Full and Open Competition:

Notional scope includes larger service craft

Illustrative examples: APL(S) and AFDM

Program Contract Approach

• IDIQ Multiple-Award (# of boat builders to be determined)

• A 10-year ordering period is planned pending Acquisition Plan approval.

• A delivery order will be issued for each specific requirement

• RFP currently targeted for 2nd QTR FY26, subject to Acquisition Plan approval

• Execution Model:

Delivery Orders anticipated to be competed among qualified awardees.

CLIN structure is planned to support various funding types.

Delivery Orders may include base and optional quantities, as appropriate and subject to final approval.

• A nominal minimum guarantee is planned; final amount to be determined upon Acquisition Plan approval.

The Government anticipates making multiple awards, subject to Acquisition Plan approval and available resources.

Contract Overview

5ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER

Lot 1 Boat Examples Small Business Set-Aside (Notional Plan)

Force Protection Boats

Workboats

Oil Spill Response

Lot 1 Service Craft & Surface Targets Small Business Set-Aside (Notional Plan)

Lighters & Barges

Surface Targets

Other Service Craft

Auxiliary Personnel Lighter (Small)

(APL(S))

• ~270 ft long x 69 ft beam

• Habitability Accommodations

• Lounges and Classrooms

Lot 2 Service Craft Examples Full and Open Competition (Notional Plan)

Auxiliary Floating Dry Dock Medium

(AFDM)

• ~700 ft long / ~11K Tons

• General Admin Office Spaces

• Conference Rooms

• Crew Lounge

The Government is sharing illustrative concepts from its early planning for Section L to give Offerors a sense of potential submission expectations. These concepts are pre-decisional and subject to change.

Concepts under consideration include requesting high-level information on company background, teaming arrangements, and key subcontractors.

The Government is also considering ways for Offerors to demonstrate relevant past performance and experience, which may include examples of similar work completed recently.

Approaches are being explored to allow Offerors without prior experience building similar craft to describe how they would successfully perform the work.

All submission instructions will be finalized and issued only in the official solicitation.

These concepts do not represent the full solicitation and do not include the final Section L

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 9

Notional Section L Concepts for Industry Awareness

The Government is sharing preliminary, illustrative concepts for how past performance may be evaluated.

The Government is considering evaluating the relevance and recentness of Offeror and subcontractor performance using examples of similar craft design or construction.

Methods for verification of past performance information, including references or Government systems such as CPARS, are being evaluated as part of the planning process.

Final evaluation criteria, weightings, and methodologies will be issued only in the official solicitation.

These concepts do not represent final evaluation criteria and are provided solely for planning and transparency.

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 10

Notional Section M Concepts for Industry Awareness

The initial MAC proposal submission is planned to be streamlined in scope to promote broad industry participation (subject to final approval).

• Comprehensive technical volumes and detailed cost breakdowns are not anticipated for the initial submission phase; final requirements will be defined in the solicitation.

• Delivery Order solicitations are expected to define the specific technical and pricing requirements applicable to each effort.

Section L (Notional)

Vol I: Technical The Government is evaluating whether Offerors should describe the facilities and workforce they plan to use for production. Details will be finalized in the official solicitation.

The Government is considering Offerors without prior similar boat and craft experience to explain how they would successfully perform the work.

Final requirements will be provided in the solicitation.

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 11

Solicitation – Section L

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 12

Volume II: Past Performance and Experience

The Government is considering requesting high-level company information, including organizational background and key teaming or subcontracting relationships.

Approaches under evaluation include requiring Offerors to demonstrate relevant past performance and experience through recent examples of similar work.

The Government is assessing options for how past performance references may be submitted and verified; final requirements will be defined in the solicitation.

The Government may consider information from various Government and public sources, such as CPARS or SAM, when evaluating past performance.

All requirements and evaluation criteria will be finalized and issued only in the official solicitation.

Solicitation – Section L Cont.

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 13

Solicitation – Section L Cont.

Volume III: Price

The Government is considering requesting Offerors to complete a standardized rates table to help assess price understanding and reasonableness. Final pricing instructions will be provided in the solicitation.

Approaches are being evaluated for how price will be assessed at both the MAC and Delivery Order levels, consistent with applicable FAR requirements.

The Government is considering not requiring detailed cost or pricing data for the initial MAC proposal submission; however, clarifications or supporting information may be requested as needed.

The Government is evaluating the types of information that may be requested to support responsibility determinations, which could include financial capability documentation or references.

All pricing instructions and responsibility documentation requirements will be finalized and issued only in the official solicitation.

Delivery Orders

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 14

Selection Process:

Notional Selection & Ordering Concepts

(Subject to change; final content in each solicitation)

Delivery Orders are anticipated to be competed among qualified IDIQ awardees in accordance with FAR 16.505.

Delivery Orders may include base and optional quantities, as appropriate; final structures will be determined at the DO level.

This approach is intended to support efficient ordering while allowing Offerors to propose updated pricing during each Delivery Order competition.

Notional RFP Package Elements

(Subject to change; final content in each solicitation)

The potential solicitation for the Delivery Order are expected to identify proposal instructions, applicable technical documents, and selection criteria.

Technical documents necessary for proposal preparation will be provided, as applicable, with each solicitation.

Depending on the requirement, solicitations may include boat-specific requirements, deliverable expectations, delivery locations, and evaluation information.

Notional Delivery Order Timelines

(Subject to change; final content in each solicitation)

The Government is assessing potential proposal and award timelines; actual timeframes will depend on scope, complexity, and available resources.

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 15

Selection Criteria:

Notional Selection Concepts

Delivery Order selections are expected to consider price and non-price factors, consistent with applicable FAR procedures. Final methodologies will be specified in each solicitation.

Price will be considered in each Delivery Order evaluation, consistent with FAR 16.505.

For fixed-price CLINs, the Government anticipates conducting price analyses in accordance with FAR 15.404-1.

Selection criteria will be defined in each solicitation and tailored to the specific requirement.

The Government intends to keep proposal requirements focused and efficient; final instructions will be provided in each solicitation.

Depending on the requirement, the Government may request technical information as part of the Delivery Order solicitation.

If technical information is requested, potential evaluation considerations may include technical approach and relevant past performance; final criteria will be detailed in each solicitation.

The Contracting Officer may conduct any analyses or reviews required under applicable FAR, DFARS, or NMCARS guidance.

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 16

Selection of Awardee for DO:

Notional Concepts for Delivery Order Award Decisions

The Government may issue Delivery Orders without discussions, consistent with the flexibilities of FAR 16.505.

As permitted under FAR 16.505, the Government may request clarifications or additional information from any number of awardees, depending on the requirement.

The Government anticipates evaluating information submitted in response to each Delivery Order solicitation, along with other relevant information available at the time of evaluation.

Award decisions are expected to be based on the selection criteria identified in each Delivery Order solicitation.

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 17

The Government is considering approaches to encourage robust competition among MAC-IDIQ awardees for individual Delivery Orders. Final submission requirements will be detailed in the solicitation.

Timeframes for proposal preparation are expected to vary based on the urgency and scope of each requirement.

The Government is assessing whether future opportunities may exist to add additional MAC-IDIQ awardees, subject to Acquisition Plan approval.

The Government may periodically review overall program needs and performance outcomes to determine whether adjustments to the contract strategy are appropriate. Any decision to add additional awardees would follow applicable FAR, DFARS, and NMCARS procedures.

Conclusion

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 18

Industry Engagement

Industry engagement and input are valuable to the Government’s planning process.

Interested parties should monitor the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) for all updates related to this effort.

The Government will review comments and questions received as part of its planning activities.

Solicitation Release Information

The Government anticipates issuing the final RFP electronically via the PIEE Solicitation Module (https://piee.eb.mil).

The final solicitation is currently targeted for release in 2nd Quarter FY26, subject to Acquisition Plan approval.

All interested parties must respond to the formal solicitation announcement once issued.

Thank you for your Attendance

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER

Questions

• Program Manager............................................. CAPT Gregory Mitchell (PMS 300)

• Deputy Program Manager................................. Zachary Snyder (PMS 300)

• Principal Assistant Program Manager................ Brian Stocker (PMS 300G)

• Assistant Program Manager............................... Matt Warncke (PMS 300G)

• Contracting Officer.............................................. Rufus Brown (SEA 02222)

• Contract Specialist.............................................. Jason Pratt (SEA 02224)

• Small Business, Deputy Director........................ Janique Hudson (SEA 00K)

Points of Contact

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER 20

Backup

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimitedUpon PAO Approval. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited

Planned Contracts

ACCELERATE| INNOVATE| DELIVER

CUI

Composite Boats MAC RFP Released Oct 2025

7m RIBs

11m RIBs

MERCs

SCB MAC

Est RFP Release Feb 2026

Patrol Boats

YRBMs

Workboats

HSMSTs

Other PMS 300 Contracts RFP Releases Ongoing

Combatant Craft

Used Vessels

Small Business Set-Aside or Full and Open

Competition

USVs & Payloads

UUVs

Maintenance

(Notional Plan) Small Business Set-Aside

95% of PMS 300 Products will be procured via Two MACs

5% of PMS 300 Products procured outside of MACs

(Notional Plan) Lot 1 Small Business Set-Aside Lot 2 Full and Open

CompeƟƟon

PMS 300 does not procure these products or services

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited As of Dec 2025