LAW Industry_Day 2 Brief.pptx

PPTX presentation 72 KB Posted

Attached to
RFI: US Navy Light Amphibious Warship (LAW)
Solicitation number
N0002420SN018
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
LAW Industry_Day 2 Q and A.pdf PDF
LAW_Industry_Day_Brief_posted_SAM.GOV.pdf PDF
LAW Industry Day 04 MAR Q and A.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Light Amphibious Warship

(LAW)

Industry Day 2 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

9 April 2020

Agenda DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

0800-0815:

Ground Rules: PMS 317C (Mr. Dan Maher) Introduction/Greeting: PMS 317 (Capt. Searles) 0815-0915:

LAW Program Brief: Mr. Dan Maher, PMS317C LAW Background Industry Day 1 recap/update RFI Results/Whitepapers RFI Next Step Questions/Answers

0915-0930: Break 0930-1600: Individual Breakout Discussions

Ground Rules

This brief and discussion is preliminary only – not binding Does not constitute a Request for Proposal nor a commitment on behalf of the Government Information provided is subject to modification and is no way binding on the Government Please hold questions until the end of the briefing No detailed information beyond the brief or the RFI will be provided to the group at this time All call in participants' phones must be muted, unless asking a question at the end of the brief Recording devices are not allowed The list of attendees, the brief/slides along with questions and answers will be posted to SAM.GOV Additional questions not answered after the brief or during the breakout discussions can be submitted via email One-on-one breakout discussions No additional time will be provided over the allotted meeting time Walk-on meeting requests will not be accepted.

Introduction

PMS317 PM Captain Scot Searles

Why LAW?

Evolving threats in the global maritime environment causing the Naval Forces to re-evaluate/adjust their CONOPs to meet the new challenges associated with maintaining persistent Naval forward presence to enable sea control and denial operations., LAW

Intended to provide Naval Forces the maneuver and sustainment vessels to confront the changing character of warfare.

LAW Background

What will LAW be?

Intended to be capable of:

Beaching on sand, gravel, shale, small stone, and man-made marine ramps.

Supporting on/offload of all existing USMC Rolling Stock PORs to beach areas with gradients of 1:40 or steeper, and fording depths of 42” or less

Operating at 14 knots for a minimum of 3500 nm

Transiting open ocean up to Sea State 5 while fully loaded

Enduring up to several weeks-long deployments and trans-oceanic transits

Operating within fleet groups, or deploy independently

Key Program Assumptions

The Navy… Anticipates a 6-8 month Detail Design and 24 month production Duration

Will choose between one of the 3 COAs Adapted Commercial Design

Alter Commercial Design

Build to Print with Historic Design Expects to leverage Industry’s commercial design with few tailored Navy requirements to meet mission

Desires to drive down life cycle costs:

The crew manning requirement identified is the maximum acceptable manning value Further reductions through technology is encouraged

LAW Industry 1 Day Recap/Update

Key LAW Attributes

The Navy considers the following attributes to be the acceptable levels :

AttributesMin Max
Cargo Area8000 sqft
Deck Loading450 lb/sqft
Service Life10 years
Transit Speed14 kts
Manning Accommodations40 Navy crew

75 Marine

Range
(Minimum operating range at transit speed w/ 10% fuel reserve)3500 NM
Crane (boat and cargo)
13 tons
Cargo Fuel90,000 gal
Overall length200 ft

LAW Industry Day 1 Recap/Update

Objectives of the RFI

The Navy desires to:

Understand Industry’s parent designs and their ability to meet the minimum attributes provided in this brief Understand the sensitivities/drivers to the parent design when modified to meet minimum attributes Understand Industry’s existing production capacity/ capability, and/or ability to partner to meet desired quantities in the required timeframe Understand any additional drivers to non-recurring engineering, production, and operating/support costs Evaluate information obtained from RFI for possible follow on Preliminary Design effort in late FY20/early FY21

Information Requested

The Navy requested that interested parties:

Identify specific attributes for which the minimum attributes can be exceeded for minimal cost increases Identify any specific attribute that is either a significant cost driver, and/or drives a significant design change With a description of the issue and preferred alteration, including the NRE ROM cost Identify any tradeoffs necessary to meet or exceed attributes Including production and cost impacts If tradeoffs are required, vendors are encouraged to prioritize based on cost and production schedule impact

The Navy request White Paper Information of ship designs w/attributes be submitted no later than 20 March

LAW RFI/Whitepaper Results Summary Significant interest from Industry with a wide range of RFI responses (12 white papers received)

RFI successfully provided:

Market research to determine that there are known concept designs and existing potential parent hull designs that could meet requirements for LAW RFI Provided required information to move forward with Industry Studies Post RET Group Company Type of Company SY = Shipyard DA = Design Agent Concept Developed or Parent Design Identified

ACompany 1DAConcept:
ACompany 2SY & DAConcept:
ACompany 3SY, teamed with DAConcept:
ACompany 4SY, teamed with DAConcept:
BCompany 5SY & DAParent
BCompany 6SY & DAParent
BCompany 7SY & DAParent:
BCompany 8SY & DAParent:
BCompany 9DAParent:
CCompany 10DAConcept:
CCompany 11DAConcept:
DCompany 12SY & DANone
DCompany 13SYNone

A- (4) Provided concepts with characteristics to meet LAW mission set B- (5) Identified potential parent designs that could be modified to meet LAW mission set C- (2) Provided concepts/protoypes being developed for other missions that may overlap with some of the LAW mission set D- (2) Provided shipyard information only

RFI Next Steps The Navy review of whitepapers showed common themes Challenging Industry:

Fording depth + 1:40 beach gradient Speed Manning / Habitability One-on-One discussion will focus on challenges Additional studies may be required this calendar year to study challenge areas, as well as impacts to concept/parent designs, such as:

Production Timeline Detail Design Timeline Long Lead Time Material (LLTM)

The Navy intent is to issue an RFP for prototype Preliminary Design in the beginning of FY21

Breakout Discussions

Breakout Discussions will be held from 0930-1400 Schedules arranged by:

Shipbuilder or Shipbuilder/Design Agent Design Agent, Consultant, or Equipment Vender Each Breakout discussion will be 25 minutes long For those breakout sessions, any material provided, prior to or after, should be appropriately marked (i.e. Proprietary, company sensitive, etc.…) Material discussed pertaining to individual company’s information will not be shared. General information discussed but pertaining to group may be shared.

Once the Breakout session is concluded, the vendor is done for the day and shall hang up

Breakout Schedules

Time SlotCompany
0930-0955Austal
1000-1025Textron Systems
1030-1055Nichols Brothers Boat Builders
1100-1125Bollinger Shipyards
1130-1155TAI/Thoma-Sea
1200-1225LUNCH
1230-1255FINCANTIERI MARINE
1300-1325Serco
1330-1355Kongsberg Maritime
1400-1425BMT
1430-1455Thrustmaster
1500-1525Karl Senner, LLC

1530-1555 Huntington Ingalls

Group 1:

Breakout Schedules

Group 2:

Time SlotCompany
0930-0955Northrup Gruman
1000-1025Rolls-Royce
1030-1055MTU America Inc.
1100-1125Leonardo DRS – Naval Power Systems
1130-1155Raytheon
1200-1225LUNCH
1230-1255Lake Shore Systems
1300-1325Aqua Chem
1330-1355H.M. Hillman Brass & Copper
1400-1425Hunt Valve Co, Inc.
1430-1455Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.
1500-1525Cypress International
1530-1555General Dynamics Mission Systems

Questions?

image3.emf image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .