JS-3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 114 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TB-37X Multi-Functional Towed Array
- Solicitation number
- N00024-18-R-6103
About this file
JS-3 Past Performance Questionnaire (info only)
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N00024-18-R-6103
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment JS-3
1. Past Performance Assessment. The Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), Washington Navy Yard, is soliciting competitive offers procure the TB-37X Multifunctional Towed Array on behalf PMS401. NAVSEA is seeking proposals from potential Offerors with the capability to provide Delivery of the TB-37X for this effort.
It is requested that you complete this past performance questionnaire and provide via email to the below listed individual no later than TBD by 1700 Eastern Standard Time, the closing time for receipt of offers.
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Attn: Brad Watson, Contracting Specialist (SEA 02622) 1333 Isaac Hull Ave. SE
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-2050 E-Mail: john.b.watson1@navy.mil
RETURN THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE
CONTRACTING SPECIALIST.
If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Specialist at the above e-mail address.
2. Contract Information. Please complete the following:
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance: Life of contract
Dollar Amount at Award:
Dollar Amount at Completion (or Current Dollar Amount, if not Completed):
Describe the Products or Services:
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
3. Contract Relevancy. For comparison with the size and scope of the PMS401 acquisition, please provide the following information pertaining to the contract identified in Section 2 above:
(a) Size: _______ hours per year in contract services.
$_______ per year in contract services.
(b) Scope: Check all that apply:
______ Program Management Support ______ Planning Support ______ Business and Financial Management Support ______ Acquisition and Contract Management Support ______ Technical Management Support ______ Test and Evaluation Management Support ______ General Logistics Management Support ______ Production Management Support ______ Engineering Support ______ Other Support (please describe: _________________________)
4. Performance Assessment Values.
5 - Outstanding. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
4 - Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
3 – Good. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
2 - Satisfactory. Performance barely meets some contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
1 - Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
0 - Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
5. Assessment Elements. Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.
a. Cost Control. Rate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes).
5 4 3 2 1 0
Comments:
b. Schedule. Rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule.
What were the causes of any schedule variances?
c. Mission Requirements. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements.
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
d. Quality. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.)
e. Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts.
f. Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.
g. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel.
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
h. Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 = No, not ever; 0 = N/A.
6. Other References. If you are aware of any other contract or a Point of Contact (POC) who is familiar with the contractor’s performance under this contract, please identify.
Name, Phone, and E-Mail Address:
7. Assessor Information. Please provide the following information about yourself:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it.