Conformed_N00024-17-R-5392_through_0004.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 11:00 AM local time 18 Aug 2017

X

A X B X C X D

EX

X

G F 145 - 149

150 - 187 X H 188 - 195 mike.kilbane@navy.mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

DO-A5 1 195

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N00024 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 1 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

MIKE B. KILBANE 202-781-0079

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

1 - 2 3 - 30

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

31 - 93 94 - 95

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

96 - 99 100 - 105

X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 106 - 111 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 112 - 117 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

118 - 137

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE BLDG 197

WASHINGTON DC 20376

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

138 - 144

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.

N0002417NR42131

5. DATE ISSUED

19 Jun 2017

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N0002417R5392

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The terms SEASABER, Surface Navy Laser Weapon System (SNLWS) Increment 1, and High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) are used interchangably throughout this solicitation and its associated technical documentation.

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

2 Each

HELIOS Test Unit Development

CPIF

High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Test Unit Development

(See Notes A and B) FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N0002417NR42131

TARGET COST

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

Provisioned Items Order (PIO)

1 Lot

(See Note B)

NET AMT

Data

Not Separately Priced (NSP) - Price included under Items 0001, 0002, and (if exercised) Option Items 0002, 0102, 0103, 0104, 0105, 0106, 0107, 0108AA, 0108BB, 0109, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 4005, and

(See Note C)

(See Exhibits A and B, DD Form 1423)

OPTION Travel FY18-FY26

COST

Travel in support of Option Items 0104, 0105, 0106, 0107, 0109, 1004,1005,1006, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3008, 3009, 3010, 4005, and 5005.

(See Note D)

ESTIMATED COST

ITEM(S) 0102 -

LIMITATION ON THE ALLOWABILITY OF COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIRFARE IN EXCESS OF THE

LOWEST PRICED AIRFARE UNDER COST TYPE CLINS

Airfare costs in excess of the lowest priced airfare available to the contractor during normal business hours are unallowable under this contract unless approved, in writing, by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), prior to the commencement of the travel. Where true program urgency exists, and PCO approval could not be obtained prior to commencement of travel, PCO approval after commencement of travel, but prior to submittal of an invoice, will be acceptable. For the purpose of this clause, the lowest priced airfare amount included on contractor travel itineraries meets the FAR requirement for Lowest Priced Airfare, subject to ongoing validation by DCAA.

FAR 31.205-46(b) establishes that "Airfare costs in excess of the lowest priced airfare available to the contractor during normal business hours are unallowable except when such accommodations require circuitous routing, require travel during unreasonable hours, excessively prolong travel, result in increased cost that would offset transportation savings, are not reasonably adequate for the physical or medical needs of the traveler, or are not reasonably available to meet mission requirements. However, in order for airfare costs in excess of the above airfare to be allowable, the applicable condition(s) set forth above must be documented and justified." In order for any airfare costs in excess of the lowest priced airfare to be considered allowable under this contract, said airfare shall: 1) meet one of the above FAR exceptions, and 2) be supported by documentation and justification, to include written PCO approval of use of airfare in excess of lowest priced airfare.

Enhanced Data Rights

FFP

OPTION

(See Note D)

169,200 Labor Hours

OPTION Sustainment Labor

(See Notes D) FOB: Destination

CPFF

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

5,877 Labor

OPTION Technical Engineering Services (FY18)

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

19,285 Labor

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY20) For Test Units

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Material for Test Units

COST

Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

OPTION

0108AA

PCA for HELIOS Test Unit

OPTION Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Test Unit

0108BB

PCA for HELIOS Production Unit

OPTION Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Unit

25,715 Labor

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY21) For Test Units

(See Note D)

OPTION Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE)

FPI

NRE in support of transition to production

(See Notes D and F)

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION LLM for HELIOS Production Lot #1

COST

Long Lead Material (LLM) for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1 (1-4 Units)

(See Notes D, F, and H)

OPTION HELIOS Production Lot #1

FPI

High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1 (1-4 units)

(See Notes D, F, H, and J)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

65,800 Labor

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #1 (FY22) FY22 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

23,500 Labor

OPTION Technical Engineering Services (FY19)

FOB: Destination

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY21) FY21 Field Engineering Services for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

OPTION Sustainment Material for Lot #1

COST

Sustainment Material for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #1 (FY23) FY23 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1

(See Note D)

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY22) FY22 Field Engineering Services for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #1 (FY24) FY24 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #1

(See Note D)

OPTION LLM for HELIOS Production Lot #2

COST

Long Lead Material (LLM) for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2 (1-5 Units)

(See Notes D, H, and K)

OPTION HELIOS Production Lot #2

FPI

Production Lot #2 (1-5 units)

(See Notes D, H, J, and K)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #2 (FY23) FY23 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

OPTION Technical Engineering Services (FY20)

FOB: Destination

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY22) FY22 Field Engineering Services for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

OPTION Sustainment Material for Lot #2

COST

Sustainment Material for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #2 (FY24) and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2

(See Note D)

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY23) FY23 Field Engineering Services for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #2 (FY25) FY25 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #2

(See Note D)

OPTION HELIOS Production Lot #3

FPI

Production Lot #3 (1-5 units)

(See Notes D, H, and J)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #3 (FY24) and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #3

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

OPTION Technical Engineering Services (FY21)

FOB: Destination

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY23) FY23 Field Engineering Services for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #3

(See Note D) FOB: Destination

OPTION Sustainment Material for Lot #3

COST

Sustainment Material for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #3

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #3 (FY25) FY25 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #3

(See Note D)

OPTION Field Engineering Services (FY24) FY24 Field Engineering Services for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #3

(See Note D)

OPTION Sustainment Labor for Lot #3 (FY26) FY26 Sustainment Labor for High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) Production Lot #3

(See Note D)

OPTION Technical Engineering Services (FY22)

FOB: Destination

OPTION Technical Engineering Services (FY23)

FOB: Destination

SECTION B NOTES

NOTE A – The Contractor may earn a schedule incentive in accordance with Section B clause entitled

“DETERMINATION OF SCHEDULE INCENTIVE FOR ITEM 0001.”

NOTE B – Funds are currently not available. Award will not be made until appropriated funds are made available.

NOTE C – Offeror shall complete the "Price Group" and "Estimated Total Price" blocks of each data item on the Contract Data Requirements List(s), attached hereto.

NOTE D – Option item to which Section I FAR clause 52.217-7 OPTION FOR INCREASED QUANTITY – SEPARATELY PRICED LINE ITEM (MAR 1989) (NAVSEA VARIATION I) (SEP 2009) (Applicable to Fixed

Price Options) or FAR 52.217-9 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT (MAR 2000) (NAVSEA VARIATION)(APR 2015) (Applicable to Cost Reimbursable Options) applies and which is to be supplied only if and to the extent said option is exercised.

NOTE E – RESERVED

NOTE F – The Government will not exercise CLIN 1003 without previously or concurrently exercising CLINs 1001 and 1002. If Option CLIN 1003 for HELIOS Lot #1 Production is exercised, and for administrative purposes involving moving obligations and expenditures, the Government may, at its discretion, move the CLIN 1001 and 1003 requirements under CLIN 1002 and convert CLIN 1002 to a Fixed Price Incentive Firm Target (FPIF) line item with the same terms (Target Cost, Target Profit, Total Target Price, Ceiling Price, Share Ratio Above Target and Share Ratio Below Target) for HELIOS Lot #1 Production requirements. In the event of subsumption, Long Lead Material shall be considered Contractor Furnished in accordance with the Section H special contract requirement entitled "SUBSUMPTION OF MATERIAL ITEMS 1002 AND 2002." Profit on Long Lead Material may only be earned if Option CLIN 1003 is exercised and Long Lead Material is subsumed.

NOTE G – RESERVED

NOTE H – Stepladder Pricing, See Attachment J-24, Stepladder Pricing Option Template.

For all option CLINs with stepladder pricing, (CLINs 1002, 1003, 2002, 2003, 3003) the Government may unilaterally exercise a given line item more than once prior to the latest option exercise date identified in clause FAR 52.217-7 (see Section I). Option CLINs with stepladder pricing may be exercised until the total quantity purchased equals the maximum quantity listed for that option CLIN in Section B.

If any line item is exercised more than once within a 90 day period from the date the Option was initially exercised, the unit price of the CLIN shall be adjusted downward to reflect the appropriate stepladder unit price for the entire quantity purchased within that 90 day period and funds will be realigned, as necessary.

The following hypothetical example illustrates how pricing will be adjusted for option CLIN 0000 if the line item is unilaterally exercised more than once within a 90 day period:

CLIN 0000

Stepladder Quantity Unit Price 100-200 $150 201-300 $120 301-400 $100

Upon first exercise of option, $22,500 is obligated to subline item (SLIN) 0000AA to provide funds to acquire a quantity of 150 units at a unit cost of $150.

150*$150 = $22,500

Upon second exercise of an additional 200 units within 90 days, $12,500 is obligated to SLIN 0000AB to provide funds to acquire a total quantity of 350 units at a unit cost of $100.

350*$100 = $35,000

Following exercise of our first two options for CLIN 0000, our contract CLIN structure for CLIN 0000 is as follows:

CLIN QTY SLIN UNIT COST EXTENDED PRICE FUNDED AMOUNT

0000 350 $100.00 $35,000 $35,000

0000 150 AA $150.00 $22,500 $22,500

0000 200 AB $62.50 $12,500 $12,500

NOTE J – The Government will only exercise Option Items 1003, 2003, and 3003 in a combination that will procure no more than nine (9) total Production units.

PRODUCTION CLIN EXERCISED NUMBER OF PRODUCTION UNITS PROCURED

Total Units Purchased (NTE 9) :

This note will be unilaterally updated by the Contracting Officer upon exercise of any Production options.

NOTE K – The Government will not exercise CLIN 2003 without previously or concurrently exercising CLIN 2002.

If Option CLIN 2003 for HELIOS Lot #2 Production is exercised, and for administrative purposes involving moving obligations and expenditures, the Government may, at its discretion, move the CLIN 2003 requirements under CLIN 2002 and convert CLIN 2002 to a Fixed Price Incentive Firm Target (FPIF) line item with the same terms (Target Cost, Target Profit, Total Target Price, Ceiling Price, Share Ratio Above Target and Share Ratio Below Target) for HELIOS Lot #2 Production requirements. In the event of subsumption, Long Lead Material shall be considered Contractor Furnished in accordance with the Section H special contract requirement entitled "SUBSUMPTION OF MATERIAL ITEMS 1002 AND 2002." Profit on Long Lead Material may only be earned if Option CLIN 2003 is exercised and Long Lead Material is subsumed.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

HQ B-2-0004 EXPEDITING CONTRACT CLOSEOUT (NAVSEA) (DEC 1995)

(a) As part of the negotiated fixed price or total estimated amount of this contact, both the Government and the Contractor have agreed to waive any entitlement that otherwise might accrue to either party in any residual dollar amount of $500 or less at the time of final contract closeout. The term “residual dollar amount” shall include all money that would otherwise be owed to either party at the end of the contract, except that, amounts connected in any way with taxation, allegations of fraud and/or antitrust violations shall be excluded. For purposes of determining residual dollar amounts, offsets of money owed by one party against money that would otherwise be paid by that party may be considered to the extent permitted by law.

(b) This agreement to waive entitlement to residual dollar amounts has been considered by both parties. It is agreed that the administrative costs for either party associated with collecting such small dollar amounts could exceed the amount to be recovered.

HQ B-2-0007 LIMITATION OF COST/LIMITATION OF FUNDS (NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

The clause entitled "LIMITATION OF COST" (FAR 52.232-20) or "LIMITATION OF FUNDS" (FAR 52.232-22), as appropriate, shall apply separately and independently to each separately identified estimated cost.

Applicable CLINs: 0001, 0102, 0104, 0105, 0106, 0107, 0109, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 4005, 5005

HQ B-2-0014 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (MAY 1993)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts for completion and phase type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and in accordance with the clause in this contract entitled "FIXED FEE" (FAR 52.216-8) or "INCENTIVE FEE", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to To be completed at time of award percent (To be completed at time of award%) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "FIXED FEE" or "INCENTIVE FEE" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars, including facilities capital cost of money). Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, in accordance with the clause of this contract entitled "LIMITATION OF FUNDS" (FAR 52.232-22) or "LIMITATION OF COST" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) in accordance with paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

Applicable CLINs: 0001

HQ B-2-0015 PAYMENTS OF FEE(S) (LEVEL OF EFFORT) (NAVSEA) (MAY 1993)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts for level of effort type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and in accordance with the clause in this contract entitled "FIXED FEE" (FAR 52.216-8) or "INCENTIVE FEE", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to To be completed at time of award percent (To be completed at time of award%) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "FIXED FEE" or "INCENTIVE FEE" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars, including facilities capital cost of money) Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) The fee(s) specified in SECTION B, and payment thereof, is subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraph (g) of the special contract requirement entitled "LEVEL OF EFFORT." If the fee(s) is reduced and the reduced fee(s) is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the final adjusted fee exceeds all fee payments made to the contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) in accordance with the "LEVEL OF EFFORT" special contract requirement, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

Applicable CLINs: 0104, 0105, 0106, 0109, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3008, 3009, 3010, 4005, 5005

HQ B-2-0016 PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION – WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT

(NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

(a) For the purpose of paragraph (c) of the "PROGRESS PAYMENTS" clause of this contract, if included, the requirement that the Contractor develop and deliver Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) is considered to be a "material requirement of this contract," and Contractor failure to make adequate progress in the development of PTD, or to deliver acceptable PTD on a timely basis, may result in reduction or suspension of Progress Payments as provided in said paragraph.

(b) The PTD is considered to be a part of the "Technical Data" specified to be delivered under this contract for the purposes of the "TECHNICAL DATA--WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT" (DFARS 252.227-7030) clause. The terms and conditions of the clause entitled "LIMITATION ON WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENTS (FAR 52.232-9), if included in this contract, shall not apply to withholding of payment for failure to make timely delivery of the PTD or delivery of deficient PTD.

HQ B-2-0017 REFUNDS (SPARES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT) (NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

(a) In the event that the price of a spare part or item of support equipment delivered under this contract significantly exceeds its intrinsic value, the Contractor agrees to refund the difference. Refunds will only be made for the difference between the intrinsic value of the item at the time an agreement on price was reached and the contract price. Refunds will not be made to recoup the amount of cost decreases that occur over time due to productivity gains (beyond economic purchase quantity considerations) or changes in market conditions.

(b) For purposes of this requirement, the intrinsic value of an item is defined as follows:

(1) If the item is one which is sold or is substantially similar or functionally equivalent to one that is sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is the established catalog or market price, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging, or labeling.

(2) If there is no comparable item sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is defined as the price an individual would expect to pay for the item based upon an economic purchase quantity as defined in FAR 52.207-4, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging or labeling.

(c) At any time up to two years after delivery of a spare part or item of support equipment, the Contracting Officer may notify the Contractor that based on all information available at the time of the notice, the price of the part or item apparently exceeds its intrinsic value.

(d) If notified in accordance with paragraph (c) above, the Contractor agrees to enter into good faith negotiations with the Government to determine if, and in what amount, the Government is entitled to a refund.

(e) If agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above cannot be reached, and the Navy's return of the new or unused item to the Contractor is practical, the Navy, subject to the Contractor's agreement, may elect to return the item to the Contractor. Upon return of the item to its original point of Government acceptance, the Contractor shall refund in full the price paid. If no agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above is reached, and return of the item by the Navy is impractical, the Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity, issue a Contracting Officer's final decision on the matter, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the "DISPUTES" clause (FAR 52.233-1).

(f) The Contractor will make refunds, as required under this requirement, in accordance with instructions from the Contracting Officer.

(g) The Contractor shall not be liable for a refund if the Contractor advised the Contracting Officer in a timely manner that the price it would propose for a spare part or item of support equipment exceeded its intrinsic value, and with such advice, specified the estimated proposed price, the estimated intrinsic value and known alternative sources or item, if any, that can meet the requirement.

(h) This requirement does not apply to any spare parts or items of support equipment whose price is determined through adequate price competition. This requirement also does not apply to any spare part or item of support equipment with a unit price in excess of $100,000; or in excess of $25,000 if the Contractor submitted, and certified the currency, accuracy and completeness of, cost or pricing data applicable to the item.

HQ B-2-0020 TRAVEL COSTS – ALTERNATE I (NAVSEA) (APR 2015)

(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Contractor shall be reimbursed for its actual travel costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. The costs to be reimbursed shall be those costs determined to be allowable, allocable and reasonable by the Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer or their duly authorized representative, as advised by DCAA.

(b) Reimbursable travel costs include only that travel performed from the Contractor's facility to the worksite, in and around the worksite, and from the worksite to the Contractor's facility.

(c) Relocation costs and travel costs incidental to relocation are allowable to the extent provided in FAR 31.205-35;

however, Contracting Officer approval shall be required prior to incurring relocation expenses and travel costs incidental to relocation.

(d) The Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the following daily local travel costs:

(i) travel at U.S. Military Installations where Government transportation is available,

(ii) travel performed for personal convenience/errands, including commuting to and from work, and

(iii) travel costs incurred in the replacement of personnel when such replacement is accomplished for the Contractor's or employee's convenience.

Applicable CLINs: 0102

HQ B-2-0023 CONTRACT SUMMARY FOR PAYMENT OFFICE (COST/FIXED PRICE) (FEB 1997)

This contract includes the following mixture of cost reimbursement and fixed price line items:

Item Type

0001 CPIF

0002 TBD*

0003 N/A

0102 COST

0103 FFP

0104 CPFF

0105 CPFF

0106 CPFF

0107 COST

0108AA FFP

0108BB FFP

0109 CPFF

1001 FPIF

1002 COST

1003 FPIF

1004 CPFF

1005 CPFF

1006 CPFF

1007 COST

1008 CPFF

1009 CPFF

1010 CPFF

2002 COST

2003 FPIF

2004 CPFF

2005 CPFF

2006 CPFF

2007 COST

2008 CPFF

2009 CPFF

2010 CPFF

3003 FPIF

3004 CPFF

3005 CPFF

3006 CPFF

3007 COST

3008 CPFF

3009 CPFF

3010 CPFF

4005 CPFF

5005 CPFF

*To be determined under each individual order

INCENTIVE FOR ITEM 0001

DETERMINATION OF SCHEDULE INCENTIVE FOR ITEM 0001

A. As part of the CPIF structure for Item 0001, the Contractor may earn a Schedule Incentive for the initial HELIOS test units. The Government's purpose for including this schedule incentive is to encourage and reward Contractor initiatives toward completing CLIN 0001 HELIOS development before the delivery date set forth in Section F and achieving a cost less than the HELIOS Target.

B. In the event the Contractor underruns the Target Cost, the Contractor may earn a greater share of the underrun, based on the following:

30 – 59 days early successful completion* of CLIN 0001 will result in a unilateral modification to update Section I Clause FAR 52.216-10 underrun share to 40/60, or

60 days or earlier successful completion* of CLIN 0001 will result in a unilateral modification to update Section I Clause FAR 52.216-10 underrun share to 30/70.

*Successful completion of CLIN 0001 is defined as completing the exit criteria defined in the SOW. If the Government does not fully fund Item 0001 to completion, the contractor will not be eligible to earn the Schedule Incentive.

C. Pursuit of the Schedule Incentive shall not come at the expense of the overall HELIOS effort. In the event of an overrun, no schedule incentive may be earned even if CLIN 0001 is successfully completed 30 days or more in advance of the delivery date specified in Section F.

D. Schedule Incentive Determination Procedures

1. Upon early successful completion of the exit criteria as detailed for Item 0001 in the SOW, the Government will use the first CPR data available in the second accounting period following completion of CLIN 0001 to determine whether the Contractor has underrun the Target Cost of CLIN 0001.

E. The Government’s determination of Schedule Incentive earned is a unilateral decision made solely at the discretion of the Government.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

SECTION C - STATEMENT OF WORK

1. Overview

1.1. Background

The High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) project is focused on accelerating the fielding of laser weapon systems to the Fleet, with an incremental approach for increasing capability as laser technology continues to mature. HELIOS will leverage proven mature technology to field a 60-150 kW class High Energy Laser (HEL), along with an integrated Counter Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C-ISR) laser for non-destructive dazzling capability against UAV-mounted sensors. The HELIOS project will deliver weapon systems to the Fleet as quickly and affordably as possible, providing modularity where practicable for future capability enhancements.

HELIOS will initially deliver two test units in FY20 (one for a DDG 51 FLT IIA and one at a Land Based Test Site), and will provide options for additional units in FY21 and beyond. To meet accelerated program delivery timelines within fiscal constraints, HELIOS will prioritize technical maturity and proven laser weapon concepts.

The overall HELIOS architecture includes the Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE) Laser Weapon System (LWS) as well as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) such as the Laser Weapon Control System (LWCS) and the Laser Fire Control System (LFCS) which contains the Deconfliction Safety System (DSS). The CFE LWS consists of all non-GFE components including, but not limited to, the laser source(s), beam transport, beam conditioning, beam director, imaging sensors, tracking algorithms, Power Conversion Module (PCM), and any additional energy or thermal management components needed to supplement ship services. The interface requirements that the CFE LWS must meet can be found in the following documents:

a. SNLWS-HME IRD-0005 (Attachment J-07)

b. SNLWS-CS PNT IRS-0003 (Attachment J-09)

c. SNLWS-LWCS IRS-0007 (Attachment J-10)

d. SNLWS-LFCS IRS-0006 (Attachment J-11)

e. SNLWS-PCM IRS-0004 (Attachment J-12)

1.2. Objective

The primary objective of HELIOS is to deliver an initial Laser Weapon System capability to the Fleet meeting all of the requirements referenced in Section 3 of this Statement of Work.

1.3. Scope

The requirements in this SOW pertain only to the CFE LWS portion of the overall HELIOS architecture. The scope of the work to be performed by the Contractor during the development of the initial Test Units includes all of the following: Systems Engineering; Design and Fabrication; System Integration; Land-Based system installation and checkout; Testing and Evaluation; as well as Production of Technical, Programmatic, Training, and Safety Data.

This SOW will include a base contract beginning with design work leading to various design reviews and culminating with system acceptance at the end of a Testing and Evaluation period.

Additionally, there are options for the Sustainment of the initial Test Units (Paragraph 3.2); Physical Configuration Audits (Paragraph 3.3), Development and Manufacturing of Production Units (Paragraph 3.4-3.5); Sustainment of the Production Units (Paragraph 3.6); as well as Technical and Field Engineering Services (Paragraphs 3.7-3.9) and associated Travel (Paragraph 3.10). The Production Unit development and sustainment options include, but are not limited to, systems engineering, component design, fabrication, integration, test and evaluation, troubleshooting, and repair of damaged components. The Technical Engineering Services consist of additional technical studies and/or simulations requested by the Government to provide a better understanding of HELIOS operation, support design upgrades, and develop additional training material. The Field Service Engineering Services consist of installation of HELIOS units along with initial setup, calibration, and checkout of each system.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1. Mandatory Documents

The following documents form a basis for the work to be performed under this SOW:

1. Top Level Requirements (TLR) for SEASABER, Included as Attachment J-02

2. SNLWS-SSD-0002, SNLWS System Scope Document (SSD) with Appendices, Included as Attachment

J-03

3. Department of Defense Security Classification Specification (DD-254), Included as Attachment J-04

4. SNLWS Program Protection Plan, Included as Attachment J-05

5. SNLWS-SEPP-0001, SNLWS Systems Engineering Program Plan (SEPP), Version 1.0, included as Attachment J-06

6. SNLWS-HME IRD-0005, SNLWS Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical Interface Requirements Document (HM&E IRD), Include as Attachment J-07

7. SNLWS-CS PNT IRS-0003, SNLWS Combat System Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (CS PNT) Interface Requirements Specification (IRS), Included as Attachment J-09

8. SNLWS-LWCS IRS-0007, SNLWS Laser Weapon Control System Interface Requirements Specification (IRS), Included as Attachment J-10

9. SNLWS-LFCS IRS-0006, SNLWS Laser Fire Control System (LFCS) Interface Requirements Specification (IRS), Included as Attachment J-11

10. SNLWS-PCM IRS-0004, SNLWS Power Conversion Module Interface Requirements Specification (IRS), Included as Attachment J-12

11. A Beam Quality Metric for High Power Lasers, High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office, dated 26 May 2016

12. SECNAVINST 5100.14D, Military Exempt Lasers, dated 18 Oct 2005

13. NAVSEAINST 9700.2, Integrated Topside Safety and Certification Program for Surface Ships, dated 11 Sep 1998

14. Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 8500.01, Cybersecurity, dated 14 Mar 2014

15. ISO/IEC 15408, Common Criteria v3.1. Release 4, dated Sep 2012

16. MIL-STD-31000A – Technical Data Packages, dated 26 Feb 2013

17. MIL-STD-882E – System Safety, dated 11 May 2012

18. NAVSEA S9310-AQ-SAF-010, Technical Manual for Batteries, Navy Lithium Safety Program and Procedures, dated 19 Aug 2004

19. NAVSEAINST 9310.1C, Naval Lithium Battery Safety Program, dated 12 Aug 2015

20. MIL-HDBK-189C, Reliability Growth Management, dated 14 Jun 2011

21. PEO IWS / Naval Sea Systems Command Research & System Engineering Warfare System Engineering and Human Systems Integration Directorate Technical Review

Manual (TRM), Version 2, dated 18 Dec 2009

22. OPNAVINST 5100.24B, Navy System Safety Program Policy, dated 06 Feb 2007

23. NAVSEAINST 5100.12B, Requirements For Naval Sea Systems Command System Safety Program For Ships, Shipborne Systems And Equipment, dated 03 Aug 2011

24. SAE GEIA-STD-0007B, Logistics Product Data, dated 10 Feb 2014

25. MIL-STD-130N, Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, dated 17 Dec 2007

26. ANSI/EIA-748, Earned Value Management Systems, dated Oct 2006

27. MIL-STD-881C – Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, dated 03 Oct 2011

28. MIL-PRF-29612B, Training Data Products, dated 31 Aug 2001

29. DoDI 8510.01, Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT), dated 12 Mar 2014

30. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-37, Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems, dated Feb 2010

31. Subchapter III of Chapter 35 of Title 44, U.S. Code (aka "Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2008")

32. Committee on National Security Systems Instruction 1253, dated 27 Mar 2014, as amended

33. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-53A Rev 4, Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, dated 18 Dec 2014

34. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-18, Rev 1, Guide for Developing Security Plans for Federal Information Systems, dated Feb 2006

35. IEEE Std. 12207, Systems and software engineering, Software life cycle processes, dated 2008

36. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289, Systems and Software Engineering, Content of life-cycle information products (documentation), dated 2015

37. ASD-S1000D, Version 4.1, International Specification for Technical Publications Utilizing a Common Source Data Base, dated 30 Sep 2009

38. MIL-STD-3034A, Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Process, dated 29 Apr

39. NAVSEA Hazardous Material Avoidance Process, T9070-AL-DPC-020/077-2, dated 28 Sep 2015

40. MIL-STD-1629A, Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA), 24 Nov 1980

41. OPNAVINST 5100.27B, Navy Laser Hazards Control Program, 02 May 2008

42. PEOIWSINST 4732.1, PEO IWS Element Certification Policy, dated 13 Nov 2012

43. PEOIWSINST 4730.1A, PEO IWS Combat System Certification Policy, dated 5 Jan

44. NAVSEAINST 9410.2A, Naval Warfare Systems Certification Policy, dated 24 Aug

45. MIL-D-23140D, Drawings, Installation Control for Electronic Equipment, 30 Apr 1992

46. Department of Defense Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Guidance, revised 13 May 2011

47. PEOIWSINST 5000.8, PEO IWS 2.0 Risk Management Policy, 13 Jan 2014

48. NAVSEAINST 5000.8, Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy, dated 21 Jul 2008

49. NAVSEAINST 9400.2A, NAVSEA Platform Information Technology-Control Systems Cybersecurity Governance and Guidance, dated 20 Sep 2016

50. SECNAVINST 5239.22, Department of the Navy Cybersecurity Safety Program (CYBERSAFE), dated 15 Nov 2016

51. PEOIWSINST 5239.1, Surface Navy Combat System Cybersecurity, dated 31 May 2016

52. DoD AT Security Classification Guide (With Change 2), dated 19 May 2014

2.2. Guidance Publications

The following publications are available as guidance:

1. DoD Modeling and Simulation for the Acquisition Workforce, Version 1.0.1, dated Oct

2. SAE GEIA-HB-0007B, Logistics Product Data Handbook, dated 05 Jun 2007

3. DoDI 4140.67, DoD Counterfeit Prevention Policy, dated 26 Apr 2013

4. DoDI 5200.44, Protection of Mission Critical Functions to Achieve Trusted Systems and Networks (TSN), Change 1, dated 25 Aug 2016

5. SECNAVINST 4855.3C, Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program, dated 27 Jun 2014

6. DOD Technical Implemntation Guide, Version 1.0, dated Nov 2016 (Classified Secret)

7. DOD Anti-Tamper Desk Reference, 2nd Edition, dated Apr 2017

8. MIL-STD-1472G, Human Engineering, dated 11 Jan 2012

9. Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, 7th Edition (Interim Release), dated Jan

10. DoDI 5200.39, Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), dated 28 May 2015

11. DoD Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook,V2.4 dated Aug 2015

12. MIL-S-901D, Shock Tests, High Impact (HI) Shipboard Machinery, Equipment, and

Systems, Requirements, dated 17 Mar 1989

13. MIL-STD-167-1A, Mechanical Vibrations of Shipboard Equipment, 02 Nov 2005

14. MIL-HDBK-2155, Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action Taken, 11 Dec

15. DoD Joint Software Systems Safety Engineering Handbook, dated 27 Aug 2010

16. NAVSEAINST 8020.6E, Department of the Navy Weapon Systems Explosives Safety Review Board, dated 11 Mar 2008

17. NAVSEA SW020-AH-SAF-010, Weapons System Safety Guidelines Handbook, 01 Feb 2006

18. DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, dated 07 Jan 2015

19. MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance, dated 07 Feb 2001

20. ANSI/EIA 649B, National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management, dated 01 Apr 2011

21. PEO IWS 2.0 Above Water Sensors Configuration Management Plan/Procedures, dated 30 Aug 2010

22. DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control Planning Guidebook for Military Systems and Equipment, Spiral 4, 04 Feb 2014

23. DoD Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Guidebook: A Guidebook of Best Practices for Implementing a Robust DMSMS Management Program (SD-22), Jan 2016

24. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allied Ordnance Publication 52 (AOP- 52), Guidance on Software Safety Design and Assessment of Munition-Related Computing Systems, Dec 2008

25. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Systems Engineering PPP Outline and Guidance, Version 1.0, Jul 2011

26. MIL-HDBK-470A, Designing and Developing Maintainable Products and Systems, Volume I, 04 Aug 1997

27. MIL-HDBK-1390, Level of Repair Analysis, 29 Jan 2015

28. MIL-HDBK 29612/1A, Guidance for Acquisition of Training Data Products and Services (Part 1 of 5 Parts), 31 Aug 2001

29. MIL-HDBK 29612/2A, Instructional Systems Development/Systems Approach to Training and Education (Part 2 of 5 Parts), 31 Aug 2001

30. MIL-HDBK 29612/3A, Development of Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Part 3 of 5 Parts), 31 Aug 2001

31. MIL-HDBK-729, Corrosion and Corrosion Prevention Metals, 21 Nov 1983

32. NAVSEA Drawing No. STD-407-5291780 EMI Reduction, dated 12 Jul 1991

33. MIL-STD-1310H Shipboard Bonding, Grounding, and Other Techniques for

Electromagnetic Compatibility, Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Mitigation, and Safety, dated 17 Sep 2009

34. MIL-STD-461G Requirements for the Control Of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment, dated 11 Dec 2015

35. MIL-STD-464C Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems, dated 1 Dec 2010

36. SECNAVINST 5000.42, Department of the Navy Accelerated Acquisition for the Rapid Development, Demonstration, and Fielding of a Capability, dated 22 Dec 2016

37. TS9090-310G, Navy Modernization Program Management and Operations Manual (NMP-MOM), Appendix H, Alterations to Ships Accomplished by Alteration Installation Teams Technical Specification, dated 12 Feb 2015

38. MIL-STD-2106, Development of Shipboard Industrial Test Procedures, dated 04 Jun

39. MIL-STD-810G, Environmental Engineering Considerations and Lab Tests, dated 1 Jan 2000

40. ASTM F1166-07, Standard Practice for Human Engineering Design for Marine Systems, Equipment, and Facilities, dated 2013

41. ASQC Q9001-2015, Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance In-Depth, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing

42. LaWS QRC Lessons Learned Final, dated December 2015

2.3. Precedence

In the event of a conflict between the documents listed in Section 2.1, Mandatory Documents, and Section 2.2, Guidance Publications, the documents in Section 2.1 shall take precedence. In the event of a conflict between the documents listed in Section 2.2, the Contractor shall contact the Government and the Government will adjudicate on a case-by-case basis.

3. Requirements

3.1. Test Unit Development (CLIN 0001)

The exit criteria for Test Unit Development (CLIN 0001) are as follows (details are provided in subsequent paragraphs in the SOW):

a. The Contractor shall create an A-Specification (CDRL A001) for HELIOS which meets the requirements in the SNLWS System Scope Document (SSD).

b. The Contractor shall develop a design for an HELIOS Test Unit that meets the HELIOS A-Specification (CDRL A001) and Government Furnished Information (GFI) SNLWS External (Mechanical, Electrical, and Logical) Interface Requirements consisting of the LWCS IRS, LFCS IRS, CS PNT IRS, PCM IRS, and the HM&E IRD.

c. The Contractor shall design, fabricate, and deliver two (2) HELIOS Test Units with each unit consisting of a High Energy Laser Weapon System combined with a C- ISR capability for countering UAS-mounted sensors.

d. The Contractor shall verify that the HELIOS Test Units meet the HELIOS A- Specification (CDRL A001) and GFI HELIOS Interface Requirements listed in Section 3.1.b.

e. The Contractor shall build, integrate, checkout, install at the Land Based Test Site, provide T&E support, and provide training material (CDRL A061) for the HELIOS Test Units delivered under CLIN 0001.

f. The maximum amount of requirements shall be verified during Factory Qualification Testing (FQT) for both Test Units in accordance with the FQT Plan (CDRL A035) and FQT Procedures (CDRL A036) prior to delivery to either the Land Based Test Site or pier-side.

g. The Contractor shall transport one (1) HELIOS Test Unit to the Land-Based Test Site (LBTS) and perform all installation, alignment, and initial checkout procedures in accordance with the LBTS Requirements and Installation Plan (CDRL A039).

The Contractor shall deliver the Government approved Land Based System Test Plan (CDRL A041), Operation Procedures (CDRL A038), and Test Report (CDRL A040).

h. The Contractor shall transport one (1) HELIOS Test Unit to the pier-side location in accordance with Section F.

i. The Contractor shall have corrected all issues associated with Trouble Reports (TRs) (CDRL A042) and implement all corresponding Revisions (CDRL A043) (Subject to Government approval within the Local Configuration Control Board

(LCCB)).

j. The Contractor shall provide a final Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Total Ownership Cost (RAMTOC) Model that reflects actual costs incurred during Test Unit Development phase and clearly shows the relationship of Test Unit hardware costs to Production and future production costs. The RAMTOC Model shall be part of the Supportability Analysis (A058).

k. The Contractor shall close or have a Government-approved closure plan for all Action Items (CDRL A003).

l. The Contractor shall deliver all required Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) (Exhibit A) and receive Government approval for all approval CDRLs.

The Government will take ownership of both HELIOS Test Units once FQT and the Land Based Test Event have been completed along with delivery of the Ship-Based system pier-side in accordance with Section F. The two Test Units shall be accepted at the same time once those conditions have been successfully satisfied.

3.1.1. Test Unit Development Overview

The purpose of the Test Unit Development is to develop a safe, affordable, and operationally useful system that meets the requirements specified in both this SOW and the SSD. The overall design of HELIOS shall ensure that all components including (but not limited to) electrical cables, plumbing, pressure vessels, batteries, chemicals, etc.

satisfy the safety, security, and installation requirements for a DDG 51 FLT IIA surface combatant. Any use of refrigerant shall be minimized to the maximum extent possible and, if required, shall be contained within a local loop and not present in manned spaces. The components associated with the four (4) modules defined in the HM&E IRD are not expected to be located in manned spaces. Additionally, HELIOS should be designed such that the failure of one or more laser modules or video sensors shall not result in the failure of the entire system, and, in as much as is practicable, should not compromise the mission.

3.1.2. Systems Engineering

3.1.2.1. System Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs)

The Contractor shall host and participate in formal SETRs.