N00019-19-R-0017_SCRM_attch1_SOW_3Dec18.docx

F-35 JPO Sustainment Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) Statement of Work (SOW)

1.0 OVERVIEW

The F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) is the Department of Defense’s (DoD) focal point for defining affordable next generation strike aircraft weapon systems for the Navy, Air Force, Marines, and our allies. The F-35 is the next generation strike fighter bringing cutting-edge technologies to the battle-space of the future. The F-35s advanced airframe, autonomic logistics, avionics, propulsion systems, stealth, and firepower will ensure that the F-35 is the most affordable, lethal, supportable and survivable aircraft ever to be used by so many warfighters around the world.

The F-35 JPO seeks to better understand the air vehicle and engine sustainment supply chain. The business environment presents a number of challenges to those concerned with Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) as new technologies, teaming partners, and vendors are constantly changing at an increasingly fast rate. Additionally, the F-35 JPO Supply Chain extends well beyond the United States. SCRM will help the F-35 JPO to more fully understand the business entities and individuals in their vendors’ supply chains, the supply chain’s scalability to support growing sustainment needs, and the potential risks of the Supply Chain.

2.0 SCOPE

The F-35 JPO relies heavily on Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney to provide insight into Sustainment Supply Chain risks for the Air System. The F-35 JPO has a good understanding of Lockheed Martin, Pratt & Whitney, and their major suppliers; however, there is often limited visibility into the sub-tier suppliers that provide critical components and personnel supporting sustainment. The JPO desires the capability to better understand the risks presented by key components and organizations in the F-35 Sustainment Supply Chain that could impact the overall program cost, schedule, and performance.

3.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TASKS AND DELIVERABLES

3.1 The contractor shall schedule and coordinate a Project Kick-Off Meeting no later than ten (10) days after contract award at the location approved by the Government. The meeting shall provide an introduction between the contractor personnel and Government personnel who shall be involved with the contract. The meeting shall provide the opportunity to discuss technical, management, and security issues. At a minimum, the individuals who shall attend include key contractor personnel, representatives from the F-35 JPO, other key Government personnel, and the PCO and COR. The contractor shall provide a Kick-Off Meeting Agenda and Kick-Off Meeting Presentation that shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

Data generated under this task shall be delivered in accordance with the following CDRL:

CDRL A001 Kick-Off Meeting Agenda and Presentation

3.2 The contractor shall develop and provide a Quarterly Status Report (QSR) using Microsoft (MS) Office Suite applications, via electronic mail (email) to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and Technical Point of Contact (TPOC). The QSR shall briefly summarize, by task area, the management and technical progress to date under the TO, as well as provide the current information indicated below. The contractor shall provide at a minimum the following information:

Data generated under this task shall be delivered in accordance with the following CDRL:

CDRL A002 Quarterly Status Report

4.0 – SCRM TASKS - The Contractor shall produce and maintain an F-35 JPO Supply Chain Mapping and associated risk assessment. All reporting, visualization, and Government user interface will be accomplished via this solution and the Government must be able to access this solution and data at all times. The Contractor shall utilize non-attribution processes to gather the data required to perform the supply chain mapping, risk assessments, and continuous monitoring. The use of open source, publically available information is highly preferred. If in the case proprietary data needs to be accessed, the contractor shall immediately notify the PCO and Contractor personnel will be required to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the prime Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Lockheed Martin Aeronautics and Pratt Whitney.

4.1 – SUPPLY CHAIN MAPPING

4.1.1 The Contractor shall map the Air System Sustainment Supply Chain to at least the 3rd tier, up to a total of 250 suppliers. The map, which will be accessed via the contractor’s software solution, will need to show how suppliers are mapped both vertically and horizontally. It will need to be maintained IAW section 4.3.

4.2 SUPPLY CHAIN RISK ASSESSMENT

4.2.1 The Contractor shall provide a high level risk analysis, comprised of a minimum of the supplier ownership history and manufacturing locations within the last ten (10) years for all 250 suppliers mapped in Section 4.1.1. The purpose of this high level risk analysis is to identify those suppliers that require a more detailed risk assessment. It will need to be maintained IAW section 4.3.

4.2.2 The Contractor shall provide a full risk analysis for 80 of the 250 suppliers identified in section 4.2.1. The full risk analysis shall include at a minimum, ownership history, financial information, partnerships, legal issues, and countries of origin and manufacturing locations. It will need to be maintained IAW section 4.3.

4.3 CONTINUOUS MONITORING AND REPORTING

4.3.1 The Contractor shall provide continuous monitoring, via a subscription or a subscription-like service, of the 250 suppliers that are mapped and analyzed per Section 4.1 and 4.2. This service will allow the Contractor to update the data near-real time, display the updated data of the supply chain and its risks, and provide alerts to the F-35 JPO registered users within 5 calendar days when a significant change happens to a supplier that would impact the original risk assessment or mapping.

4.3.2 (OPTION CLIN 1001) If the Option CLIN is exercised by the Government, the Contractor shall provide continuous monitoring subscription or subscription-like service for the 250 suppliers mapped and analyzed in the base period of performance, plus an additional 250 suppliers for a total of 500 suppliers during the period of performance of the Option CLIN.

5 GENERAL INFORMATION

5.1 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE / HOURS OF OPERATIONS

The primary place of performance will be at the Contractor’s facility. The contractor will need to interact with employees of the F-35 JPO located at: 200 12th Street South and 2521 S. Clark St. Arlington, Virginia (VA).

5.2 SECURITY REQUIREMENT

The work being performed on this effort will be at the UNCLASSIFIED level and remain UNCLASSIFIED. Access to CLASSIFIED data will not be permitted under this effort.

5.3. SECTION 508 COMPLIANCE.

All Electronic and Information Technology (EIT) products and services proposed shall fully comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, per the 1998 Amendments, 29 United States Code (U.S.C.) 794d, and 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1194. The contractor shall identify all EIT products and services proposed, identify the technical standards applicable to all products and services proposed, and state the degree of compliance with the applicable standards. Additionally, the contractor must clearly indicate where the information pertaining to Section 508 compliance can be found (e.g., vendor’s website or other exact web page location). The contractor shall ensure that the list is easily accessible by typical users beginning at Time of Award (TOA) and shall inform the COR and TPOC of the information location.

5.4 QUALITY CONTROL

The Contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this SOW and the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). The Contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The Contractor’s quality control program is the means by which the Contractor assures that work complies with the requirement of the SOW.

5.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE

The Government shall evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the QASP. The principal evaluator of Contractor work quality is the Government COR/Alternate COR (ACOR) in coordination with TPOC/Alternate TPOC (ATPOC). This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the Contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the plan will survey, observe, test, sample, evaluate, and document the Contractor’s performance standards identified in the contract.

Page | 3