MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 6-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION - MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT DRAFT SOLICITATION Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document is a draft Past Performance Questionnaire for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) related to a federal contract opportunity.

The MATOC will be a firm-fixed price, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for a broad range of general construction projects at Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base, Lake Martin recreation site, and Vigilant Warrior training site. Work may include design, construction, modifications, and renovations of facilities, roads, and infrastructure. The magnitude of construction is over $10 million. The contract will be a 100% Small Business set-aside, and offerors must have a minimum bonding capacity of $19,999,031.25. The Past Performance Questionnaire requests information on the contractor's past performance in areas such as schedule, quality control, problem resolution, and subcontractor management. Responses will be used to evaluate prospective contractors for award of the MATOC contract.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to GENERAL CONSTRUCTION - MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT DRAFT SOLICITATION, newest first.
File Type Posted
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 2 - Specifications.pdf PDF
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 8 - Subcontractor Consent Letter.pdf PDF
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 5 - AF3052.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 7 -Past Performance Information.pdf PDF
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 1 - SOW.pdf PDF
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 9 - Section L-Instructions Conditions and Notice to Bidders v3.docx DOCX document
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 4 - B1095 - DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
MATOC Draft ATTACHMENT 10 - Section M-Evaluation Factors.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DRAFT ATTACHMENT 6

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Request for Current and Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation from . This firm is currently being considered for a contract with the Government a Multiple Award Task Order Contract various locations across

Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base, AL, Lake Martin recreational site, and Vigilant Warrior training site.

A member of the Past Performance team will be contacting you to telephonically complete the attached questionnaire. If you have any questions concerning this request contact Mr.

Dartamien Brown at dartamien.brown.1@us.af.mil or Mr. Eldrae Perdue at eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil.

Thank you, Eldrae Perdue

Contracting Officer

42d Contracting Squadron

WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IN

ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 and 3.104 mailto:shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil mailto:eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing a check in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Place a check in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the establish schedule.

2. Provided an experienced superintendent with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.

3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors.

4. Paid Subcontractors/suppliesr in a timeley manner.

5. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.

6. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

7. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.

8. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

9. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation.

10. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

11. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages?

12. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

Explanations/Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail to: dartamien.brown.1@us.af.mil and eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil mailto:shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil mailto:eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil

from:
through:
through_2:
Subcontractor: Off
Key Personnel: Off
ExplanationsRemarks 1:
ExplanationsRemarks 2:
ExplanationsRemarks 3:
ExplanationsRemarks 4:
Date:
Text2:
Text3:
Text4:
Text5:
Text6:
Text7:
Text8:
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Check Box16: Off
Check Box17: Off
Check Box18: Off
Text19:
Text20:
Text21:
Text22:
Text23:
Text24:
Text25:
Text26:
Check Box27: Off
Check Box28: Off
Check Box29: Off
Check Box30: Off
Check Box31: Off
Check Box32: Off
Check Box33: Off
Check Box34: Off
Check Box35: Off
Check Box36: Off
Check Box37: Off
Check Box38: Off
Check Box39: Off
Check Box40: Off
Check Box41: Off
Check Box42: Off
Dropdown43: [Yes]
Dropdown44: [No]
Dropdown45: [No]
Check Box47: Off
Check Box48: Off
Check Box49: Off
Check Box50: Off
Check Box51: Off
Check Box52: Off
Check Box53: Off
Check Box54: Off
Check Box55: Off
Check Box56: Off
Check Box57: Off
Check Box58: Off
Check Box59: Off
Check Box60: Off
Check Box61: Off
Check Box62: Off
Check Box63: Off
Check Box64: Off
Check Box65: Off
Check Box66: Off
Check Box67: Off
Check Box68: Off
Check Box69: Off
Check Box70: Off
Check Box71: Off
Check Box72: Off
Check Box73: Off
Check Box74: Off
Check Box75: Off
Check Box76: Off
Check Box77: Off
Check Box78: Off
Check Box79: Off
Check Box80: Off
Check Box81: Off
Check Box82: Off
Check Box83: Off
Check Box84: Off
Text85:
Text86: RFP FA330024R0027

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .