MATOC ATTACHMENT 6-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- GENERAL CONSTRUCTION - MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA330024R0027
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity. The contracting agency is the 42nd Contracting Squadron, Air Education and Training Command, Department of the Air Force.
The contract opportunity is for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) to perform a broad range of general construction, design, repair, alteration, and demolition projects at various locations including Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base, Alabama, Lake Martin recreation site, and Vigilant Warrior training site. The work may involve multiple disciplines and all divisions of construction. The contract magnitude is over $10 million. The NAICS code is 236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, and the contract will be a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. Offerors must have a minimum aggregate bonding capacity of $19,999,031.25.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 11 - WD AL20240093.pdf | ||
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 1 - SOW.pdf | ||
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 2 - Specifications.pdf | ||
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 7 -Past Performance Information.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA330024R0027 20Aug24.pdf | ||
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 10 - Section M-Evaluation Factors.docx | DOCX document | |
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 9 - Section L-Instructions Conditions and Notice to Bidders v3.docx | DOCX document | |
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 8 - Subcontractor Consent Letter.pdf | ||
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 3 - B1095 - SPECIFICATIONS.pdf | ||
| MATOC ATTACHMENT 5 - AF3052.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Request for Current and Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation from . This firm is currently being considered for a contract with the Government a Multiple Award Task Order Contract various locations across
Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base, AL, Lake Martin recreational site, and Vigilant Warrior training site.
A member of the Past Performance team will be contacting you to telephonically complete the attached questionnaire. If you have any questions concerning this request contact Mr.
Dartamien Brown at dartamien.brown.1@us.af.mil or Mr. Eldrae Perdue at eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil.
Thank you, Eldrae Perdue
Contracting Officer
42d Contracting Squadron
WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 and 3.104 mailto:shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil mailto:eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Program Description:
G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):
H. Period of Performance
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
I. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
J. Description of work performed:
K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing a check in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
Place a check in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E V S M U N/A
1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the establish schedule.
2. Provided an experienced superintendent with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.
3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors.
4. Paid Subcontractors/suppliesr in a timeley manner.
5. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.
6. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
7. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.
8. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
9. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation.
10. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
11. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages?
12. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
Explanations/Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-mail to: dartamien.brown.1@us.af.mil and eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil mailto:shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil mailto:eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil
| from: |
| through: |
| through_2: |
| Subcontractor: Off |
| Key Personnel: Off |
| ExplanationsRemarks 1: |
| ExplanationsRemarks 2: |
| ExplanationsRemarks 3: |
| ExplanationsRemarks 4: |
| Date: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Text7: |
| Text8: |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
| Text13: |
| Text14: |
| Text15: |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Text19: |
| Text20: |
| Text21: |
| Text22: |
| Text23: |
| Text24: |
| Text25: |
| Text26: |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box37: Off |
| Check Box38: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box42: Off |
| Dropdown43: [Yes] |
| Dropdown44: [No] |
| Dropdown45: [No] |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check Box57: Off |
| Check Box58: Off |
| Check Box59: Off |
| Check Box60: Off |
| Check Box61: Off |
| Check Box62: Off |
| Check Box63: Off |
| Check Box64: Off |
| Check Box65: Off |
| Check Box66: Off |
| Check Box67: Off |
| Check Box68: Off |
| Check Box69: Off |
| Check Box70: Off |
| Check Box71: Off |
| Check Box72: Off |
| Check Box73: Off |
| Check Box74: Off |
| Check Box75: Off |
| Check Box76: Off |
| Check Box77: Off |
| Check Box78: Off |
| Check Box79: Off |
| Check Box80: Off |
| Check Box81: Off |
| Check Box82: Off |
| Check Box83: Off |
| Check Box84: Off |
| Text85: |
| Text86: RFP FA330024R0027 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .