Market Survey Questionaire FY28 Frequency Converter Plant_YND.docx
DOCX document 213 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912HV-26-Z-0022
About this file
This is a Market Survey Questionnaire for a FY28 electrical substation project at Yokohama North Dock, Japan. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is evaluating alternative acquisition strategies—Progressive Design Build (PDB) and Integrated Design and Construction (IDAC)—to determine local Japanese contractor interest and capability for this complex electrical infrastructure project.
The questionnaire targets local sources physically located and licensed to conduct business in Japan. Under PDB, contractors are selected based on qualifications, past performance, and expertise rather than firm bid price, with Phase 1 involving preconstruction and design services at a fixed fee or negotiated rate while design progresses from 0-10% to 60-90% maturity, followed by Phase 2 construction execution under Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) or Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) terms. IDAC similarly employs a two-phase structure where a separately contracted Architect-Engineer advances the design while the contractor provides constructability reviews, value engineering, and cost estimations during Phase 1, with Phase 2 execution as FFP after negotiation. Both methods emphasize "open-book" pricing transparency, early contractor involvement in design decisions, reduced bidding risk, and an "off-ramp" provision allowing the Government to competitively bid remaining work if Phase 1 pricing cannot be agreed upon. The survey addresses Phase 1 experience with collaborative contracting methods, electrical infrastructure expertise, USACE/U.S. Forces Japan compliance history, willingness to share cost data, and stakeholder integration; Phase 2 questions cover design maturity requirements, open-book estimating comfort, and off-ramp acceptability; and general project questions address specialized subcontractor engagement timing, long-lead procurement timelines (transformers, switchgear), and labor/logistical challenges specific to the Yokohama North Dock location over the 24-36 month execution period.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FY28 MILCON Frequency Converter Plant, Yokohama North Dock, Japan Market Survey Questionnaire
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Purpose: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is exploring the use of alternative acquisition strategies like Progressive Design Build and Integrated Design and Construction for the upcoming electrical substation project at Yokohama North Dock. Because these contracting method differ from traditional U.S. Government Fixed-Price Design-Build contracts, this summary is provided to explain the different framework, how risks are shared, and how the contractor and Government will collaborate as well as to determine local industry interest in these new methods.
What is Progressive Design-Build (PDB)?
PDB is a highly collaborative project delivery method. Unlike traditional Design-Build where contractors must submit a final construction proposal based on an incomplete preliminary design, PDB selects a contractor based primarily on their qualifications, past performance, and expertise, rather than a final price.
What is Integrated Design & Construction (IDAC)?
The Integrated Design and Construction (IDAC) acquisition strategy represents a highly collaborative, two-phase procurement method designed to mitigate risks, compress timelines, and control costs on complex military and civil works construction projects. The intent is to competitively select the construction contractor early in the design cycle. This allows the construction contractor to provide real-time constructability reviews, cost estimations, and market supply-chain analysis while the Designer of Record (DOR) finalizes the design.
For both methods, once the contractor is selected, the U.S. Government and the Contractor work together as a team to collaboratively/progressively develop the design, schedule, and cost.
Acquisition Outline: The Two-Phase Contract Structure for PDB and IDAC
PROGRESSIVE DESIGN BUILD (PDB)
| Phase |
| Description of Contractor Activities |
| Payment & Pricing |
| Goal |
| Phase 1: Preconstruction & Design |
| The Contractor is hired when the design is at 0% to 10%. They work with the Government to advance the design. The Contractor provides real-time cost estimating, identifies long-lead materials (e.g., transformers), and ensures constructability. |
| The Contractor is paid a fixed fee or negotiated rate for these Phase 1 design and consulting services. |
| Phase 1 is to progress the design to a level of maturity (60%-90% completion) where a highly accurate, fair and reasonable construction cost can be established. |
| Phase 2: Construction Execution |
| Once the design reaches an agreed-upon milestone (usually 60% to 90% complete), the Contractor submits a final proposal to construct the facility based on the design they helped create. |
| Executed as a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) or Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) agreed upon by both parties. |
| Following price acceptance, the existing contract is modified to include the construction contract scope and cost. |
INTEGRATED DESING & CONSTRUCTION (IDAC)
| Phase |
| Description of Contractor Activities |
| Payment & Pricing |
| Goal |
| Phase 1: Preconstruction & Design |
| The Government contracts highly qualified AE under the FAR standards. Contractors are then contracted separately early on during design (35%). They work together with the Government and AE to advance the design, participating in design workshops, perform value engineering, conduct site investigations, and review design packages. |
| The Contractor is paid a fixed fee or negotiated rate for Phase 1 design and consulting services. |
| Phase 1 is to collaboratively have the AE and Contractor progress the design to a level of maturity (60%-90% completion) where a highly accurate, fair and reasonable construction cost can be established. |
| Phase 2: Construction Execution |
| Once the design reaches an agreed maturity (usually 60% to 90% complete), the Government negotiates a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) for construction. |
| Executed as a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract after negotiated. |
| Following price acceptance, the existing contract is modified to include the construction contract scope and cost. |
Key Concepts for Japanese Contractors Progressive Design Build
· Open-Book Pricing (Phase 1): To reach a fair and reasonable construction price for Phase 2, the Contractor must use "open-book" estimating during Phase 1. This means transparently sharing subcontractor quotes, material costs, and overhead calculations with the Government as the design develops.
· Reduced Bidding Risk: Because the Contractor is selected based on qualifications rather than a firm bid price, the Contractor does not have to assume the high financial risk of estimating construction costs on incomplete conceptual drawings.
· Fast-Tracking (Early Work Packages): PDB allows the Government to award specific construction tasks (such as site clearing, foundation work, or ordering long-lead electrical equipment) before the 100% final design is finished, accelerating the overall project schedule.
· The "Off-Ramp" Provision: If the Government and the Contractor cannot agree on a fair construction price at the end of Phase 1, the Government may exercise an "off-ramp." The Contractor will be fully paid for their Phase 1 design services, the contract will be closed, and the Government will bid the remaining construction work to the open market.
Integrated Design and Construction
· Japanese firms must transition from bidding on 100% finished plans to acting as early-stage pre-construction consultants at the 35% design mark.
· Open-Book Pricing (Phase 1): To reach a fair and reasonable construction price for Phase 2, the Contractor must use "open-book" estimating during Phase 1. This means transparently sharing subcontractor quotes, material costs, and overhead calculations with the Government as the design develops.
· The Tri-Party Boundary: In contrast to Japanese Design-Build (Sekkei-Seko), the contractor operates alongside a separately contracted Architect-Engineer (A-E) firm. The contractor provides constructability advice but does not take on design liability.
Conclusion: USACE recognizes that complex electrical infrastructure projects require specialized expertise and careful supply chain management. By utilizing PDB, we aim to partner with the contractor early, reduce risks for both parties, and ensure the successful delivery of critical infrastructure at Yokohama North Dock.
SURVEY QUESTION AS FOLLOWS:
Phase 1 Questions:
1. Has your firm previously executed a project using a "Integrated Design and Construction “, "Early Contractor Involvement (ECI)," or a similar highly collaborative, two-phase contract structure (where the builder is selected on qualifications before the design is complete)? If yes, please provide a brief example.
2. Please describe your firm’s experience designing, engineering, and constructing high-voltage electrical substations or similar heavy electrical infrastructure within the last 5–7 years.
3. Has your firm previously executed projects for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Forces Japan (USFJ), or the Ministry of Defense (MOD) requiring compliance with U.S. design standards (e.g., UFCs, NEC)?
4. A key component of PDB is "open-book" pricing during Phase 1 to jointly develop the construction cost. Is your firm willing and able to share detailed cost data, subcontractor quotes, and overhead/ profit calculations with the U.S. Government before a final price is agreed upon?
5. How would your firm integrate U.S. Government stakeholders into your typical design reviews and decision-making processes?
6. Describe a project where your firm successfully collaborated with a separately-contracted Designer of Record (DOR) representing the Government. How did you resolve design/constructability disagreements?
Phase 2 Questions:
1. During the initial RFP phase, what level of design maturity (e.g., 15%, 35%) does your firm require to provide a realistic target construction price or pricing ceiling for an electrical substation?
2. Is your firm comfortable with an "open-book" estimating process during Phase 1 to reconcile costs with the Independent Government Estimate (IGE)?
3. If a final price cannot be agreed upon at the end of Phase 1, the Government will continue to 100% design and will bid competitively as a traditional Design Bid Build. Does this "off-ramp" provision present a barrier to your firm participating in this solicitation? If so, what mitigations would you suggest?
4. How can the Government best structure the Phase 1 pre-construction phase to allow for the early acquisition or reservation of critical long-lead items (e.g., microgrids, generators, specialized materials)?
General Project Questions:
1. How early in the Phase 1 design process would you need to engage specialized electrical subcontractors to guarantee pricing and schedule?
2. Given current global supply chain constraints, what is your estimated lead time for procuring major electrical components (e.g., transformers, switchgear) required for a substation in the Yokohama area?
3. Do you foresee any labor shortages or logistical challenges specific to executing a heavy electrical project at Yokohama North Dock over the next 24-36 months?
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .