Attachment_2_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Software as a Service Time Bill
- Solicitation number
- M67861-14-T-0072
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire - Attachment 2
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4_-_Time_Reporting_(SaaS)__PRS.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3_-_LRS_ERD_vd.mht | MHT file | |
| Attachment_1_-_TSO_Labor_Reporting_Guideline.docx | DOCX document | |
| M67861-14-T-0072.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE M67861-14-T-0072
Instructions:
Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, should verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) the first page of this questionnaire and the letter of transmittal (as provided to assessor).
Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: irving.romero@usmc.mil I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| M67861-14-T-0072 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Software as a Service Project Time Reporting System |
| Customer/Agency |
| Marine Forces Reserve, Technology Services Organization |
| Project/Requirement Description |
| Contractor to implement/configure and provide access for 550 seats on contractor hosted server for Software as a Service Project Time Reporting System. |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
Contractor Name:
Contractor Address:
Contract Number: <Insert contract number>
Type of Contract: <Insert contract type>
Contract Value: <Insert contract value ($) > (Initial) , <Insert value of contract at award> (Final)
Period of Performance: <Insert start date> to <Insert end date>
Project/Requirement Description: <Insert project/requirement description>.
The Contractor here served as on the contract listed above.
The contract listed above was .
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name: <insert name of assessor>
Title: <insert title of assessor>
Email Address: <insert assessor email address>
Phone number: <insert assessor phone number>
Role:
If other, what was the Assessor’s role: <if the Assessor served in a different role than above, list here>
Period of Involvement: <start date> to <end date>
IV. Evaluation Definitions (The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.)
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Quality of Performance, OVERALL
The quality of the contractor’s OVERALL performance was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a detailed rationale for the assigned rating>
2. Conformance to Contract Requirements
The contractor’s conformance to contract requirements was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a rationale for the assigned rating>
3. Schedule, OVERALL
The contractor’s OVERALL ability to meet schedule requirements was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a detailed rationale for the assigned rating>
4. Timeliness in meeting milestones
The contractor’s timeliness in meeting milestones was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a rationale for the assigned rating>
5. Management Performance, OVERALL
The contractor’s OVERALL management performance was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a detailed rationale for the assigned rating>
6. Subcontract Management
The contractor’s subcontract management (i.e. timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.) was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a rationale for the assigned rating>
7. Management of Personnel
The contractor’s management of personnel (i.e. ability to support the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget) was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a rationale for the assigned rating>
If management issues/problems were experienced on the contract, did the Government contribute to the issues/problems cited above?
If the Government contributed to management issues/problems on the contract cited above, please explain the situation: <provide an explanation of circumstances here>
8. Invoicing
The contractor’s ability to submit timely and accurate invoices was .
The rationale for the assigned rating is: <please provide a rationale for the assigned rating>
9. OVERALL Performance Rating
The contractor’s OVERALL performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) was .
Please provide any additional comments here:
<please provide any additional comments here>
Assessor Signature
Date
Assessor: Thank you very much for your assistance in evaluating this Offeror’s past performance. After completion, please sign and submit via email to irving.romero@usmc.mil .
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .