M67854-25-Q-0509_Attachment 3_Evaluation Procedures.pdf
PDF 108 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cellular Signal Booster System
- Solicitation number
- M6785425Q0509
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Procedures attachment for Solicitation M67854-25-Q-0509, detailing the methodology for evaluating quotes for a Cellular Signal Booster System. The evaluation will be based on three key factors: Technical, Past Performance, and Price, with a hierarchical importance ranking where Technical is most critical, followed by Past Performance, and Price will be evaluated but not rated. Quotes will be assessed on their ability to meet or exceed the requirements specified in the Performance Work Statement, with a focus on providing the best value to the Government.
Quoters must provide a comprehensive quote that clearly shows the total price, including all transportation charges, delivered to the specified destination. The Government will determine price fairness and reasonableness. For past performance, relevancy and customer satisfaction will be evaluated, with favorable past performance carrying more weight. Notably, quoters without past performance will not be penalized but will not receive additional scoring advantages. The solicitation allows for potential award to a higher-priced quoter if deemed to provide superior overall value based on the evaluation factors.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M67854-25-Q-0509 Attachment 3
EVALUATION PROCEDURES
Attachment 3 Solicitation M67854-25-Q-0509
1.0 EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Award will be made to the responsible quoter offering the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government may or may not award to the lowest price quoter if award to a higher price quoter is determined to be of best value to the Government when evaluated against Evaluation Factors 2.1, 2,2 and 2.3 below.
2.0 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
The evaluation factors are Technical, Past Performance, and Price. Technical is more important than Past Performance. Past Performance is more important than Price. Price will be evaluated but not rated.
2.1 Technical
Quotes will be evaluated to determine the extent to which they meet, exceed or approximate the Cellular Signal Booster System as stated in Section 2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS), Attachment 1, or provide a suitable substitution, in a manner that provides the best value to the Government.
2.2 Past Performance
Past performance will be evaluated for relevancy, as well as customer satisfaction. Quoters without past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably for past performance, but favorable past performance will carry more weight in the overall evaluation than a lack of past performance.
2.3 Price
To be considered for award, quotations must clearly show the total price of the quotation, inclusive of all transportation charges, delivered to the destination specified. The Government will make a determination that quoted prices are Fair and Reasonable.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .