Attachment_11_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_CTC.docx

Attachment 11 M67854-15-R-7901 Past Performance Questionnaire Recent and Relevant Past Performance Questionnaire

1. Past Performance Assessment.

The United States Marine Corps (USMC) Program Manager for the Training and Education Command on behalf of the Marine Corps Communication Electronics School (MCCES) is soliciting competitive offers from qualified offerors. The Government is seeking proposals from potential offerors with the capability to provide Instructional Services, Curriculum Management, and Curriculum Development. One of the factors used to evaluate offeror proposals is Past Performance, to use an offeror’s performance on recent and relevant contracts as predictive of how they might perform on the solicited effort.

The offeror that forwarded this questionnaire to you requests that you complete this questionnaire and provide it, via regular mail or email, to the below listed individual no later than 22 July 2015.

Attn: Teri Snyder, Contract Specialist 2200 Lester Street Quantico, VA 22134 Teri.snyder@usmc.mil 703-432-6488

*NOTE: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO ENSURE ALL PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT BY 22 July 2015.

If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. If you have any questions, please contact the Contract Specialist at the above e-mail address.

2. Contract Information. Please complete the following:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

*(or Current Dollar Amount, if not Completed)

Contract Type (e.g. Fixed-Price, Labor Hour or Time and Material, Cost Reimbursement (CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, etc.)): _________________________

Description of the Products or Services:

3. Contract Relevancy. For comparison with the size and scope of this requirement, please provide the following information pertaining to the contract identified in Section 2, above:

(a) Size: $____________ per year in contract services.

(b) Scope: Check all that apply:

____ Other Support (please describe)___________________

4. Performance Assessment Values.

5 - Outstanding. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government's benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 - Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government's benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3 - Good. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to have been, or were, satisfactory.

2 - Satisfactory. Performance meets most some contractual requirements, but barely so. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions, or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented.

1 - Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions, if any were attempted, appear to be or were ineffective.

0 - Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

5. Assessment Elements. Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

a. Cost Control. Rate the contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, over-run/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes).

5 4 3 2 1 0

Comments:

b. Schedule. Rate the contractor's ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

5 4 3 2 1 0

Comments:

c. Mission Requirements. Rate the contractor's ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements.

5 4 3 2 1 0

d. Quality. Rate the contractor's ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor's conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental or safety and health standards.)

5 4 3 2 1 0

e. Socioeconomic Goals. Rate the contractor's ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB), Women Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), HUBZone and Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCUIMI).

5 4 3 2 1 0

f. Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor's ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts.

5 4 3 2 I 0

Comments:

g. Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.

5 4 3 2 1 0

h. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing key personnel when necessary.

5 4 3 2 1 0

Comments:

Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 =No, not ever; 0 =N/A.

5 4 3 2 1 0

Comments:

6. Other References. If you are aware of any other contract or a Point of Contact (POC) who is familiar with the contractor's performance under this contract, please identify.

Name, Phone and E-Mail Address:

7. Assessor Information. Please provide the following information about yourself:

Name:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

Email: