PastPerformanceWorkSht2Rev1.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- M34000246439P0002 Mattress Refurbishment
- Solicitation number
- M0068122Q0028
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| E1 RFQ M0068122Q0028P0002.pdf | ||
| D1 RFQ M0068122Q0028P0001.pdf | ||
| D3 RFQ M0068122Q0028.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the U.S. Marine Corps, Camp Pendleton Regional Contracting Office to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to jody.koch@usmc.mil and jennifer.l.white@usmc.mil
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
As a technical point of contact it is requested for you to provide comments regarding the contractor’s performance. You are requested to provide both a “Rating” and a “Narrative” explanation to support the rating.
Contract Number:
Period of Performance Being Evaluated:
Name of Technical Evaluator:
Technical Evaluator Signature:
The following definitions should be used to help you in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Evaluation: Quality of Service Guidance: Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements. Include, as applicable, information on the following:
• Does the service provided meet the specifications of the contract?
• Does the contractor’s work measure up to commonly accepted industry standards?
• What degree of Government technical direction—if any—was required to solve problems that arose during performance?
• If you have the opportunity to hire this person again would you hire again?
Yes or No, if no please explain:
Enter Comments:
Evaluation: Schedule Guidance: Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
This assessment of the contractor’s adherence to the required delivery schedule should include the contractor’s efforts during the assessment period that contributes to or affects the schedule variance.
Did the contractor adhere to all scheduled requirements?
Evaluation: Management Guidance: Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. Include, as applicable, information on the following:
• Is the contractor oriented toward the customer?
• How responsive is the customer to addressing problems identified by the government?
• How proactive is the customer at addressing potential issues?
• Is interaction between the contractor and the government satisfactory or does it need improvement?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .