PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

SOLICITATION: M00264-16-R-0005 VENDOR: ___________________

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

*Please denote if the vendor was either the Prime or Subcontractor in supporting your requirement.

Instructions:

· Sections I through III are to be completed by the Offeror and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror on a recent, relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, is to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC Regional Contracting Office, National Capital Region to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: darrell.williamson@usmc.mil. Because of the firewall at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Enterprise Email addresses are often filtered out. Please call (703.432.0010) to make sure your email was received.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information Assessor: The information listed below is

NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract Number

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Performance Period / Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

III. Assessor Information Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Technical Capability

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the technical capability of the contractor’s performance?

Technical Capability

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Identified project tasks and provided continuous quality support

Understood performance objectives through a comprehensive approach

Identified mission areas, understood those priorities through execution

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance / Timeliness

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Schedule / Timeliness

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Completion of Contract / Task Order / Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Performance Execution and Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Performance Execution & Management

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Approach

Performance Execution

Management of Personnel

Management Approach – Demonstrated ability to provide and possess the capabilities and resources to establish and operate an efficient organization that is both responsive and flexible in meeting all project requirements Performance Execution – Demonstrated ability to respond to performance-based work requirements necessary to provide products and/or services. Demonstrated experience which ensures suitable oversight and control of performance execution in a manner which ensured consistent quality of the performance tasks as per the project requirements Management of Personnel – Proven ability to identify the responsibilities and roles of qualified and experienced personal to attain performance objectives, execution of processes and quality measures associated with executing strategy. Demonstrated approach for immediate action and remediation necessary to ensure the quality of the contract deliverables and timeliness of services delivery (i.e., process maturity, roles of responsible staff, degree of work breakdown structure (WBS) integration, and controls at both corporate and contract level under performance based operating procedures).

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments: