Attachment_2_--_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 128 KB Posted

Attached to
Uniform Alterations Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M00263-19-R-0001
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

About this file

Attachment 2 -- Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Uniform Alterations, newest first.
File Type Posted
M0026319R0001-U0001_SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_--_PWS.pdf PDF
_RFP_M00263-19-R-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_--_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_--_Non-Serially_Managed_Government_Furnished_Property.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE

PARRIS ISLAND

PO BOX 5069

PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA 29905-5069

Past Performance Questionnaire Instructions:

· Section II to be completed by the Offeror and provided to the assessor. The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections II through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor:

Your assistance is requested by the Regional Contracting Office (RCO), Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC (MCRDPI) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: vanessa.rodgers@usmc.mil & rodney.c.small@usmc.mil.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number
M00263-19-R-0001
Requirement
Uniform Alterations
Agency
RCO-MCRDPI
Requirement Description
Recruits, Permanent Personnel, and Reserve Uniform Alterations.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is FORMCHECKBOX

FILLIN \* MERGEFORMAT correct or incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME, POC & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract

Initial
Final

Contract Value

Period of Performance

Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
PRIME
SUBCONTRACTOR
Termination History
Convenience
Default
N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

(
Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Workmanship *

* Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Schedule Performance

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Responsiveness

Program Management

Management Of Personnel

Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices

Management Of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost Control

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Price Estimates

Invoicing

Forecasting Management

Price Estimates: Ability to meet proposed prices and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates.

Invoicing: Accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of invoices submitted.

Forecasting/Management:

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature

Date Attachment 2 - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY – SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

File details come from the government source that posted it.