08-T-9035 Past Performance Questionnaire.doc

Performance Evaluation Survey M00146-08-T-9035

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

COVER SHEET

For Request for Quotation M00146-08-T-9035

Name and address of offeror questionnaire is being completed for:

Name of company completing questionnaire: ________________________________________

Contract Number: _____________________________________________________________ Contract Type: ______________________________________________________________

Contract Amount: ______________________________________________________________

Contract Period of Performance ___________________________________________________

(including all options)

Product/Service Description: _____________________________________________________

Name, title and phone number of person completing questionnaire: _______________________

Length of time your firm has been involved with this company:___________________________

Submit completed Cover Sheet and Survey via facsimile or e-mail to:

CONTRACTING DEPARTMENT

Supply MCAS, Cherry Point, NC

Attn: Cynthia Ives, Contract Specialist

Phone: (252) 466-2022

Fax: (252) 466-3571 e-mail: cynthia.ives@usmc.mil

Request return by COB on: 25 June 2008

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET

RATING SCALE

Please use the following ratings to answer the questions. If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “N/A”.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Excellent - The company’s performance was consistently superior.

Good -

The company’s performance was better than average or the contractual performance was mostly favorable and corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - The company’s performance was satisfactory or there were minor performance problems which were satisfactorily corrected.

Marginal- The company’s performance was mostly unsatisfactory or there were minor performance problems which were not satisfactorily corrected.

Unsatisfactory - The company’s performance was entirely unsatisfactory or there were serious performance issues with the contractor for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOTE:

For statements indicating “Unsatisfactory,” “Marginal,” or “Excellent”, please provide an explanation in the comments section of this survey.

.(5) The Contractor’s ability to sell advertising and successfully recoup publication costs based on their past performance.

a.) QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

c.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of its subcontracts.

e.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

f.) KEY PERSONNEL:

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

h.) OTHER:

(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( )No If you answered "No" provide an explanation.

(2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( )Yes ( ) No

If you answered "Yes", provide an explanation.______________________________________________

COMENTS: (Required for ALL Poor and Excellent Ratings)