LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612_(Unsecured).pdf

Limited Hazardous Building Materials Inspection

Inspection Date: May 28-30, 2025

261 Cook Avenue Meriden, Connecticut

City of Meriden Meriden, Connecticut

June 11, 2025; Revised June 12, 2025

June 11, 2025; Revised June 12, 2025

Mr. Brian Ennis, P.E.

City Engineer

City of Meriden 142 East Main Street Meriden, CT 06450

Re: Limited Hazardous Building Materials Inspection

261 Cook Avenue, Meriden, Connecticut

Fuss & O’Neill Project No. 20170932.C89

Dear Mr. Ennis:

Enclosed is the report for the limited hazardous building materials inspection conducted in response to the proposed demolition at 261 Cook Avenue, Meriden, Connecticut (the “Site”). The work was conducted for the City of Meriden (the “Client”).

The services were performed on May 28-30, 2025 by Fuss & O’Neill, Inc. licensed inspectors and included a comprehensive asbestos-containing material (ACM) inspection, lead-based paint (LBP) determination, and visual inspection for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in source building materials. The information summarized in this report is for the above-mentioned materials only. The work was performed in accordance with our written proposal dated May 9, 2025.

If you should have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at

(860) 783-4662. Thank you for this opportunity to have served your environmental needs.

Sincerely, Carlos Texidor Associate

CT/kr

Enclosure

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx i

Table of Contents

Limited Hazardous Building Materials Inspection Report 261 Cook Avenue, Meriden, Connecticut City of Meriden

1 Introduction

1.1 Building and Mechanical System Description

2 Asbestos Inspection

2.1 Methodology

2.2 Results

2.3 Discussion

2.4 Conclusions and Recommendations

3 Lead-Based Paint Determination

3.1 Methodology

3.2 XRF Determination Results

3.3 Discussion

3.4 Conclusion and Recommendations

4 Lead Waste Characterization

4.1 Sample Collection Methodology

4.2 Results

4.3 Conclusion

5 Waste Characterization for Ash

5.1 Sampling

5.2 Results

5.3 Conclusion

6 Presumed PCB-Containing Source Building Materials Inspection

6.1 Methodology

6.2 Observations

6.3 Conclusions and Recommendations

Tables End of Report

1. Summary of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials

2. Summary of Identified Asbestos-Containing Materials and Materials Containing <1% Asbestos Inventory

3. Inventory of Presumed PCB-containing Source Building Materials

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx ii

Appendices End of Report

A LIMITATIONS

B INSPECTOR LICENSES AND ACCREDITATIONS

C ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM

D SAMPLE LOCATION DIAGRAMS AND SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

E XRF LEAD DETERMINATION FIELD DATA SHEETS

F WASTE CHARACTERIZATION LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 1

1 Introduction

On May 28-30, 2025, Fuss & O’Neill, Inc. (Fuss & O’Neill) representatives Stacy Vanderveer and Craig Cyr performed a hazardous building materials inspection for the proposed demolition at 261 Cook Avenue, Meriden, Connecticut (the “Site”). The work was conducted for the City of Meriden (the “Client”) in accordance with our written scope of services dated May 9, 2025, and is subject to the limitations included in Appendix A.

The inspection included the following: asbestos-containing material (ACM) inspection, lead-based paint (LBP) determination, and inventory of Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) source materials

This hazardous building materials inspection was performed in response to the proposed demolition activities and included the entire building, including exterior and roof.

This inspection was not limited to non-invasive and discrete sampling techniques. Specific areas that were not inspected include the following: within mechanical equipment and spaces beneath floor slabs.

We have excluded collection and analysis of building materials for PCBs. Sampling for PCBs is presently not mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); however, significant liability risk for disposing of PCB-containing wastes exists. Recent knowledge of PCBs within these matrices has become more prevalent, especially with remediation contractors, waste haulers, and disposal facilities. Many property Owners have become subject to large changes in schedule, scope, and costs as a result of failure to identify this possible contaminant prior to renovation or demolition.

1.1 Building and Mechanical System Description

The building structure includes three stories with a full basement and was reportedly constructed in 1905. The building contains approximately 4,470 square feet (SF) of total floor area. According to City of Meriden records, renovations to the building have been conducted at various times. The building is heated by two separate oil-fired hot water boiler systems.

2 Asbestos Inspection

A property Owner must ensure that a thorough ACM inspection is performed prior to possible disturbance of suspect ACM during renovation or demolition activities. This is a requirement of the EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulation located at Title 40 CFR, Part 61, Subpart M.

On May 28, 2025, Ms. Stacy Vanderveer and Mr. Craig Cyr of Fuss & O’Neill conducted the inspection. Mr. Cyr conducted supplemental sampling on May 30, 2025. Ms. Vanderveer and Mr. Cyr are both State of Connecticut Department of Public Health (CTDPH) licensed Asbestos Inspectors. Refer to Appendix B for the Asbestos

Inspector licenses and accreditations.

2.1 Methodology

The inspection was conducted by visually inspecting for suspect ACM and touching each of the suspect materials.

The suspect materials were categorized into three EPA NESHAP groups: friable and non-friable Category I and Category II type ACM.

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 2

A Friable Material is defined as material that contains greater than 1 percent (> 1%) asbestos that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

A Category I Non-Friable Material refers to material that contains > 1% asbestos (i.e., packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products) that when dry cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

A Category II Non-Friable Material refers to any non-friable material excluding Category I materials that contain > 1% asbestos that when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

The suspect ACM were also categorized into their applications including Thermal System Insulation (TSI), Surfacing ACM (S), and Miscellaneous ACM (M). TSI includes those materials used to prevent heat loss/gain or water condensation on mechanical systems. Examples of TSI are pipe insulation, boiler insulation, duct insulation, and mudded pipe fitting insulations. Surfacing ACM includes those ACM that are applied by spray, trowel, or otherwise applied to an existing surface. Surfacing ACM is commonly used for fireproofing, decorative, and acoustical applications. Miscellaneous materials include those ACM not listed as thermal or surfacing, such as linoleum, vinyl asbestos flooring, ceiling tiles, caulking compounds, glues, construction adhesives, etc.

The EPA recommends collecting suspect ACM samples in a manner sufficient to determine asbestos content and to segregate each suspect type of homogeneous (similar in color, texture, and date of application) materials. The EPA NESHAP regulation does not specifically identify a minimum number of samples to be collected for each homogeneous material, but the NESHAP regulation does recommend the use of sampling protocols included in Title 40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E: Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).

The EPA AHERA regulation requires a specific number of samples be collected based on the type of material and quantity present. This regulation includes the following protocol:

1. Surfacing Materials (S) (i.e., plasters, spray-applied fireproofing, etc.) must be collected in a randomly distributed manner representing each homogeneous area based on the overall quantity represented by the sampling as follows:

a. Three (3) samples collected from each homogeneous area that is less than or equal to 1,000 square feet.

b. Five (5) samples collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 square feet but less than or equal to 5,000 square feet.

c. Seven (7) samples collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 square feet.

2. Thermal System Insulation (TSI) (i.e., pipe insulations, tank insulations, etc.) must be collected in a randomly distributed manner representing each homogeneous area. Three (3) samples must be collected from each material. Also, a minimum of one (1) sample of any patching materials applied to TSI presuming the patched area is less than 6 linear or square feet should be collected.

3. Miscellaneous materials (M) (i.e., floor tile, gaskets, construction mastics, etc.) should have a minimum of two (2) samples collected for each type of homogeneous material. Sample collection was conducted in a manner sufficient to determine asbestos content of the homogeneous material as determined by the inspector.

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 3

The inspectors collected samples of those suspect ACM anticipated to be disturbed by the proposed demolition activities and prepared a proper chain of custody form for transmission of the samples to Scientific Analytical

Institute (SAI) for analysis. SAI is a State of Connecticut-licensed and American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)-accredited asbestos laboratory. The sample locations, material type, sample identification, and asbestos content are identified by bulk sample analysis in Table 1 attached hereto. Suspect ACM not listed in the table that may be identified later at the Site, should be assumed to be ACM until sample collection and analysis indicate otherwise. Initial asbestos sample analysis was conducted using the EPA Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA/600/R-93/116) via Polarized Light Microscopy with Dispersion Staining

(PLM/DS).

If samples of suspect materials could not be collected or were inaccessible but observed elsewhere, these materials were assumed to contain asbestos and the inspectors approximated quantities. The exterior and roof were not included in the scope of work for this comprehensive inspection. Also, intrusive or destructive investigative techniques were performed at the Site to access and observe concealed areas that may have had suspect ACM that were hidden or obstructed from normal view. Hard enclosures or obstructed areas typically include, but are not limited to, the following:

Wall cavities;

Pipe chases;

Spaces above fixed ceilings;

Areas behind equipment (including freezers and refrigeration units);

Vapor/moisture barrier under floors.

Subsurface investigations including, but not limited to, concrete foundations were not performed. Also, Fuss & O’Neill did not conduct subsurface investigations to identify suspect cementitious pipe throughout the Site.

2.2 Results

Utilizing the EPA protocol and criteria, the following materials were determined to contain asbestos:

9”x9” floor tile (under sheet flooring)

The following materials were identified as containing asbestos at less than one percent (< 1%):

Gray interior caulking compound on storm windows Black mastic associated with green 9” x 9” floor tiles

White/gray original window glazing compound

Refer to Table 1 for a complete list of ACM and non-ACM sampled as part of this comprehensive inspection.

Refer to Table 2 attached hereto for the identified ACM inventory. Refer to Appendix C for the asbestos laboratory report and chain of custody forms. Refer to Appendix D for the Sample Location Diagrams and Site photographs.

2.3 Discussion

The EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) define a material that contains greater than one percent (> 1%) asbestos, utilizing PLM/DS, as being an ACM. The CTDPH defines any material that

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 4 contains equal to or greater than one percent (≥ 1%) asbestos, utilizing PLM/DS, as being an ACM. Materials that are identified as "none detected" are specified as not containing asbestos.

Suspect ACM not identified during this inspection should be presumed to contain asbestos until sample collection and laboratory analysis indicate otherwise.

Additionally, the EPA has suggested that materials that are non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials (e.g., asphaltic-based materials, adhesives, etc.) are recommended for further confirmatory analysis utilizing

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). None of the collected samples were recommended to be analyzed by

TEM.

2.4 Conclusions and Recommendations

Based on visual observations, sample collection, and laboratory analysis, asbestos has been identified in some of the materials sampled at the Site.

Prior to disturbance, ACM that would likely be impacted by the proposed demolition activities must first be abated by a state-licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor. This is a requirement of CTDPH and EPA NESHAP regulations governing asbestos abatement.

Due to the inability to effectively separate some types of multi-layered ACM (e.g., floor tiles and mastics, etc.)

from non-ACM, these materials are considered asbestos-contaminated and must be managed as ACM for the purposes of removal and disposal.

Fuss & O’Neill recommends that a comprehensive scope of work and technical specifications be developed as part of demolition plans for the Site.

Suspect materials encountered during demolition that are not identified in this report as being non-ACM should be presumed to be ACM until sample collection and laboratory analysis indicate otherwise. Prior to renovation/demolition that may disturb hidden/inaccessible areas, we recommend conducting a supplemental asbestos inspection of these areas and spaces: below the slab.

Fuss & O’Neill recommends that if any ACM are to remain in the building following renovation/demolition activities, the materials should be managed in-place under a written Operations and Maintenance Program in accordance with OSHA regulations.

This report is not intended to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document. The report is designed to aid the Client in locating identified ACM.

3 Lead-Based Paint Determination

On May 28, 2025, Ms. Stacy Vanderveer of Fuss & O’Neill performed a lead-based paint (LBP) determination associated with coated building components at the Site that may be disturbed during demolition activities. An x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer was used to perform the LBP determination. The determination was conducted in accordance with generally accepted industry standards for non-residential buildings.

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 5

3.1 Methodology

A Heuresis Pb200i handheld XRF lead paint analyzer, serial number 2171, was utilized for the LBP determination.

The instrument was checked for proper calibration prior to use as detailed by the manufacturer and the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) developed for the instruments.

For the purpose of this LBP determination, representative building components were tested as part of this pre-demolition study. Individual repainting efforts are not discoverable in such a limited program. LBP issues involving properties that are not residential are regulated to a limited degree for worker protection relating to paint-disturbing work activities and waste disposal.

Worker protection is regulated by OSHA regulations, as well as CTDPH regulations. These regulations involve air monitoring of workers to determine exposure levels when disturbing lead-containing paint. An LBP determination cannot determine a safe level of lead but is intended to provide guidance for implementing industry standards for lead in paint at identified locations. Contractors may then better determine exposure of workers to airborne lead by understanding the different concentrations of LBP activities that disturb paint on representative surfaces.

The EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as well as the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP), regulate disposal of lead-containing waste. Lead-containing materials that will be impacted during renovation or demolition activities and result in waste for disposal must either be analyzed using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis if lead is determined to be present in non-residential buildings or be presumed as a hazardous waste. A TCLP sample is a representative sample of the intended waste stream. The results are compared to a threshold value of 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L);

results equal to or exceeding this value are considered hazardous lead waste. If the result is below the established level, the material is not considered hazardous and may be disposed as general construction debris.

A level of LBP equal to or exceeding 1.0 milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm2) by XRF is considered toxic or dangerous for compliance with residential standards. For the purpose of this LBP determination the level of 1.0 mg/cm2 has been utilized as a threshold for areas where possible worker exposures may occur.

3.2 XRF Determination Results

The LBP determination indicated consistent painting trends associated with representative building components that may be impacted by potential demolition work. The following building components were determined to contain levels of lead (equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2) by XRF:

Exterior metal fire escape Exterior wood door components Exterior wood porch components

Exterior wood soffits Exterior wood siding Exterior and interior wood window components

Interior metal door frame (basement) Interior plaster walls & ceiling (at stairs & 1st floor kitchen)

Refer to Appendix E for the XRF lead determination field data sheets.

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 6

3.3 Discussion

OSHA published a Lead in Construction Standard (OSHA Lead Standard) Title 29 CFR, Part 1926.62 in May 1993. The OSHA Lead Standard has no set limit for the content of lead in paint below which the standards do not apply. The OSHA Lead Standards are task based and derived from airborne exposure and blood lead levels.

The results of this LBP determination are intended to provide guidance to contractors for occupational lead exposure controls. Building components coated with lead levels above industry standards may cause exposures to lead above OSHA standards during proposed demolition and renovation activities. The results of this determination are also intended to provide insight into waste disposal requirements, in accordance with EPA RCRA regulations. A TCLP sample to characterize the expected waste that may result from demolition work was collected as part of this inspection.

3.4 Conclusion and Recommendations

Based on our LBP determination results, LBP is present on coated building components located on or in the building that were tested by XRF as part of this inspection.

Contractors must be made aware that OSHA has not established a level of lead in a material below which Title 29 CFR, Part 1926.62 does not apply. Contractors shall comply with exposure assessment criteria, interim worker protection, and other requirements of the regulation as necessary to protect workers during any demolition work that will impact lead paint.

If disturbed by renovation or demolition activities, LBP-coated building components should be segregated from the general waste stream for sample collection and analysis by TCLP to determine proper off-site waste disposal.

Fuss & O’Neill collected a representative sample for TCLP analysis; refer to Section 4. If disturbed and managed off-site, non-porous LBP-coated building materials (i.e., metals) may be segregated and recycled as scrap metal.

Metal LBP-coated building components cannot be subject to grinding, sawing, drilling, sanding, or torch cutting.

Note that future work involving surface preparation of identified painted surface(s) must be performed in accordance with OSHA worker protection requirements.

Those surfaces which do not contain LBP are not subject to the RRP requirements. If a specific component or surface is not identified as having been tested, it should be presumed to contain lead paint unless tested.

Contractors should be aware that the threshold limit of 1.0 mg/cm2 for purposes of RRP requirements is not recognized by OSHA and workers exposures are still subject to lead in construction regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 regardless of paint testing results.

4 Lead Waste Characterization

A waste is a solid or liquid material that serves no further purpose. A waste is defined by EPA to be hazardous if it contains certain properties that could pose dangers to human health and the environment after it is discarded.

Wastes that are ignitable, corrosive, reactive, or toxic are regulated under the Hazardous Waste Regulations.

TCLP is a method that extracts the compounds of interest in a standard way simulating landfill conditions (EPA Title 40 CFR, Part 261).

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 7

4.1 Sample Collection Methodology

Mr. Craig Cyr collected representative aliquots of various lead-based paint-containing and lead-containing building components throughout the building. Material substrates such as brick, concrete, and wood were segregated in accordance with LBP determination data. Representative aliquots were collected of the individual substrates/surfaces and composited based on their respective quantities into a single sample.

Complete Environmental Testing, Inc., (CET) of Stratford, Connecticut, analyzed the composite sample. CET is a State of Connecticut-certified laboratory. The sample was analyzed using EPA Method SW-846 (Extraction

Method 1311).

4.2 Results

Two composite samples were collected and analyzed: one a composite of the entire building and one a composite of the exterior building materials. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) defines toxic concentrations for lead which is commonly identified in paint to be equal to or greater than 5.0 milligrams per liter

(mg/L), or parts per million (ppm).

The analytical result of the representative composite sample of the entire building indicates the waste leaches lead at less than 5.0 mg/L (1.2 mg/L) and, therefore, is not classified as a hazardous waste. The analytical result of the representative composite sample of the exterior building materials indicates that the waste leaches lead at greater than 5.0 mg/L (19 mg/L) and, therefore, is classified as a hazardous waste. Refer to Appendix G for the

Lead Waste Characterization Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Form.

4.3 Conclusion

Based on the TCLP laboratory analytical results of the entire building, the representative waste stream composite sample would not be classified by EPA or CTDEEP as hazardous waste. The exterior building materials would be classified by EPA or CTDEEP as hazardous waste. Additional waste characterization sampling may be required for this site based on the method of remediation and waste segregation and/or the requirements of the disposal facility. As long as all the construction debris of the entire building are not segregated, all construction debris is not hazardous.

5 Waste Characterization for Ash

5.1 Sampling

On May 30, 2025, Fuss & O’Neill’s representative Mr. Craig Cyr collected a representative sample of ash material from the boiler ash dump accessible from the furnace room.

The sample collected was analyzed by Complete Environmental Testing, Inc., (CET) of Stratford, Connecticut, which is a State of Connecticut-certified laboratory. The sample was analyzed for waste characterization utilizing TCLP parameters including RCRA 8 metals (EPA 6010D) and mercury (EPA 7471B).

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 8

5.2 Results

In total, one composite fly ash sample was collected and analyzed by the laboratory. The analytical results indicate the material is hazardous waste for disposal purposes.

RCRA 8 Metal Analyte Result (mg/kg) RCRA 8 Allowable Level (mg/kg) Lead 120 5.0

Selenium 9.8 1.0

Cadmium 1.0 1.0

Chromium 8.1 5.0

Arsenic 13 0.5

Barium 64 100

Silver ND 5.0

Bold indicates result exceeds criteria

5.3 Conclusion

The sample result was compared to the RCRA regulations for waste disposal and was determined to be hazardous waste for disposal purposes based on the analysis criteria. The waste material within the boiler chimney should be removed and segregated for proper disposal as hazardous waste. The laboratory results supporting the findings are attached in Appendix H.

6 Presumed PCB-Containing Source Building Materials Inspection

Sampling of building materials for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is presently not mandated by the EPA.

However, significant liability exists for building owners who improperly dispose of a PCB-containing waste material. Recent knowledge and awareness of PCBs within matrices has become more prevalent, especially amongst remediation contractors, waste haulers, and disposal facilities.

Presently, building materials containing PCBs at concentrations equal to or greater than (≥) 50 parts per million (ppm) or the equivalent units of milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) are regulated by the EPA and characterized as PCB Bulk Product. Building materials containing less than (<) 50 ppm may also be regulated unless proven to be an Excluded PCB Product. The definition of an Excluded PCB Product includes those products or sources of the products containing < 50 ppm concentration PCBs that were legally manufactured, processed, distributed in commerce, or used before October 1, 1984. Building materials determined to be Excluded PCB Product containing > 1 ppm PCBs but < 50 ppm PCBs are regulated by CTDEEP. Building materials containing ≤ 1 ppm PCBs are considered non-regulated.

Additionally, the identification of building materials containing regulated PCBs requires additional testing of the adjacent porous surfaces and/or soils, asphalts, and concrete located below source materials. The building materials adjacent to the regulated PCB material must be tested to determine if the adjacent materials are PCB contaminated and may also be considered PCB Bulk Products, if disposed with source materials. Soils, asphalts, and concrete located below source materials must be tested to determine if the materials are PCB contaminated and considered PCB Remediation Waste.

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx 9

6.1 Methodology

On May 28, 2025, Ms. Stacy Vanderveer and Mr. Craig Cyr performed a visual inspection of caulking and glazing compounds scheduled to be impacted by the proposed Project as materials which may contain PCBs.

Refer to Table 3 for a list of presumed PCB-containing building materials.

6.2 Observations

The following materials are suspect PCB-containing materials that will be impacted by the demolition activities:

Exterior window caulking & glazing compounds

6.3 Conclusions and Recommendations

At a minimum, Fuss & O’Neill recommends the caulking and glazing compounds scheduled to be removed during the Project be presumed to contain PCBs and handled and disposed of in accordance with EPA regulations as

PCB Bulk Product Waste.

Fuss & O’Neill recommends that a comprehensive scope of work and technical specification for presumed PCB remediation during demolition be developed as part of Site demolition plans.

This report is not intended to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document. The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractors, and contractors in locating presumed PCB-containing materials.

Report prepared by Environmental Analyst Stacy Vanderveer.

Reviewed by:

Carlos Texidor Associate

F:\P2017\0932\C89\Deliverables\Report\LtdHazardousBldgMaterialsInspection_Revised_20250612.docx

Tables

Table 1 Summary of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials

Sample No. Sample Location Material Type Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

01A-CC-052825 1st Floor – NE Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat ND PLM

01B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Living Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat ND PLM

01C-CC-052825 1st Floor – NW Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat ND PLM

01D-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat ND PLM

01E-CC-052825

1st Floor – W Rooms Shared

Closet White Plaster Wall Skim Coat ND PLM

02A-CC-052825 1st Floor – NE Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat ND PLM

02B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Living Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat ND PLM

02C-CC-052825 1st Floor – NW Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat ND PLM

02D-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat ND PLM

02E-CC-052825

1st Floor – W Rooms Shared

Closet Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat ND PLM

03A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Plaster Wall Skim Coat Over

Wood Ply (No Rough Coat)

ND PLM

03B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Plaster Wall Skim Coat Over

Wood Ply (No Rough Coat)

ND PLM

03C-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Plaster Wall Skim Coat Over

Wood Ply (No Rough Coat)

ND PLM

04A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Living Room 2’x2’ Gray Ceiling Tile (Pinholes and

Fissures)

ND PLM

04B-CC-052825 1st Floor – SE Room 2’x2’ Gray Ceiling Tile (Pinholes and

Fissures)

ND PLM

05A-CC-052825 SAMPLE OMITTED

05B-CC-052825 SAMPLE OMITTED

06A-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room 1’x1’ Brown Fiberboard Ceiling Tiles

(Mechanically Fastened)

ND PLM

06B-CC-052825 1st Floor – NW Room 1’x1’ Brown Fiberboard Ceiling Tiles

(Mechanically Fastened)

ND PLM

07A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile ND PLM

07B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile ND PLM

08A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom White Wall Tile Mudset Associated with 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile

ND PLM

08B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom White Wall Tile Mudset Associated with 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile

ND PLM

09A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom Brown Wall Tile Grout Associated with 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile

ND PLM

09B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom Brown Wall Tile Grout Associated with 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile

ND PLM

10A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1”x1” Mixed Copper Colored Wall Tile

(Same Mudset and Grout as 1’x1’

Red Wall Tile)

ND PLM

Sample No. Sample Location Material Type Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

10B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom

1”x1” Mixed Copper Colored Wall Tile

(Same Mudset and Grout as 1’x1’ Red Wall Tile)

ND PLM

11A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1’x1’ Pink Floor Tile ND PLM

11B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1’x1’ Pink Floor Tile ND PLM

12A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1’x1’ Tan Floor Tile ND PLM

12B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom 1’x1’ Tan Floor Tile ND PLM

13A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom Dark Gray Grout Associated with

1’x1’ Pink/Tan Floor Tile

ND PLM

13B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom Dark Gray Grout Associated with

1’x1’ Pink/Tan Floor Tile

ND PLM

14A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom Gray Mudset Associated with 1’x1’

Pink/Tan Floor Tile

ND PLM

14B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Bathroom Gray Mudset Associated with 1’x1’

Pink/Tan Floor Tile

ND PLM

15A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Cream Laminate Kitchen Countertop with Associated Clear Adhesive

ND/ND PLM/TEM

15B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Cream Laminate Kitchen Countertop with Associated Clear Adhesive

ND PLM

16A-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room Brown and Black Paper Underlay

Below Hardwood Flooring

ND/ND PLM/TEM

16B-CC-052825 1st Floor – SE Room Brown and Black Paper Underlay

Below Hardwood Flooring

ND PLM

17A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Stair 1’x1’ Green and White Tile Patterned

Sheet Floor

ND/ND PLM/TEM

17B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room 1’x1’ Green and White Tile Patterned

Sheet Floor

ND PLM

18A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Kitchen Door Window Glazing

(Kitchen-Stair Door)

ND/ND PLM/TEM

18B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Kitchen Door Window Glazing

(Kitchen-Stair Door)

ND PLM

19A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

19B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

20A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Brown Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

20B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Brown Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

21A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Light Gray Mudset Associated with

Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

21B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Light Gray Mudset Associated with

Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

22A-CC-052825 1st Floor – Living Room Gray Interior Caulking Compound on Storm Windows

ND/0.84%

Anthophyllite

PLM/TEM

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

22B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Living Room Gray Interior Caulking Compound on

Storm Windows

ND PLM

23A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen 4”x4” Yellow Ceramic Wall Tile ND PLM

23B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen 4”x4” Yellow Ceramic Wall Tile ND PLM

24A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen 4”x4” Black Ceramic Wall Tile ND PLM

24B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen 4”x4” Black Ceramic Wall Tile ND PLM

25A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen White Wall Tile Thinset Associated with 4”x4” Ceramic Wall Tiles

ND PLM

25B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen White Wall Tile Thinset Associated with 4”x4” Ceramic Wall Tiles

ND PLM

26A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Cream Wall Tile Grout Associated with 4”x4” Ceramic Wall Tiles

ND PLM

26B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Cream Wall Tile Grout Associated with 4”x4” Ceramic Wall Tiles

ND PLM

27A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Dark Brown 1’x1’ Tile Pattern Sheet

Floor

ND/ND PLM/TEM

27B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Hallway Dark Brown 1’x1’ Tile Pattern Sheet

Floor

ND PLM

28A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Black/White 1’x1’ Tile Pattern

Laminate Countertop with Associated

Clear Adhesive

ND PLM

28B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen

Black/White 1’x1’ Tile Pattern

Laminate Countertop with Associated Clear Adhesive

ND PLM

29A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Brown Laminate Countertop with

Associated Clear Adhesive

ND/ND PLM/TEM

29B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Brown Laminate Countertop with

Associated Clear Adhesive

ND PLM

30A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Insulation and Associated Yellow Adhesive Behind Kitchen Center

Light

ND PLM

30B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Kitchen Insulation and Associated Yellow Adhesive Behind Kitchen Center

Light

ND PLM

31A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NW Room Brown Paper Underlay Below

Hardwood Floor

ND/ND PLM/TEM

31B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room Brown Paper Underlay Below

Hardwood Floor

ND PLM

32A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White Bathtub Caulking Compound ND/ND PLM/TEM

32B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom White Bathtub Caulking Compound ND PLM

33A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White 1’x1’ Floor Tile Top Layer ND PLM

33B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White 1’x1’ Floor Tile Top Layer ND PLM

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

34A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White Tile Thinset Associated with

White 1’x1’ Floor Tile Top Layer

ND PLM

34B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White Tile Thinset Associated with

White 1’x1’ Floor Tile Top Layer

ND PLM

35A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White Tile Grout Associated with

White 1’x1’ Floor Tile Top Layer

ND PLM

35B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom White Tile Grout Associated with

White 1’x1’ Floor Tile Top Layer

ND PLM

36A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Green 1”x1” Floor Tile Bottom Layer ND PLM

36B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Green 1”x1” Floor Tile Bottom Layer ND PLM

37A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Black 1”x1” Floor Tile Bottom Layer ND PLM

37B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Black 1”x1” Floor Tile Bottom Layer ND PLM

38A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Gray Tile Mudset Associated with

Green and Black 1”x1” Bottom Layer

Floor Tiles

ND PLM

38B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom

Gray Tile Mudset Associated with

Green and Black 1”x1” Bottom Layer Floor Tiles

ND PLM

39A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Gray Tile Grout Associated with

Green and Black 1”x1” Bottom Layer Floor Tiles

ND PLM

39B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – Bathroom Gray Tile Grout Associated with

Green and Black 1”x1” Bottom Layer

Floor Tiles

ND PLM

40A-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Black Fiberglass Insulation

Paperback

ND/ND PLM/TEM

40B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Black Fiberglass Insulation

Paperback

ND PLM

41A-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room

Green 9”x9” Floor Tiles Below

Green and White Patterned Sheet Floor

4% Chrysotile

PLM

41B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room Green 9”x9” Floor Tiles Below Green and White Patterned Sheet Floor NA/Pos Stop -------------

42A-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room Black Mastic Associated with

Green 9”x9” Floor Tiles

ND/0.24%

Chrysotile

PLM/TEM

42B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room Black Mastic Associated with Green

9”x9” Floor Tiles

ND PLM

43A-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

43B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

44A-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom White Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

44B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom White Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

45A-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom Gray Mudset Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

45B-CC-052825 3rd Floor – Bathroom Gray Mudset Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

46A-CC-052825 Basement – Center Dark Gray Chimney Brick ND PLM

46B-CC-052825 Basement – Center Dark Gray Chimney Brick ND PLM

47A-CC-052825 Basement – Center Gray Chimney Brick Mortar ND PLM

47B-CC-052825 Basement – Center Gray Chimney Brick Mortar ND PLM

48A-CC-052825 Basement – Center Gray CMU Brick Foundation Wall ND PLM

48B-CC-052825 Basement – E Wall Gray CMU Brick Foundation Wall ND PLM

49A-CC-052825 Basement – Center Light Gray Mortar Associated with

CMU Brick Foundation Wall

ND PLM

49B-CC-052825 Basement – E Wall Light Gray Mortar Associated with

CMU Brick Foundation Wall

ND PLM

50A-CC-052825 SAMPLE OMITTED

50B-CC-052825 SAMPLE OMITTED

51A-CC-052825

Basement – Throughout (Except

Bathroom) Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

51B-CC-052825

Basement – Throughout (Except

Bathroom) Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

52A-CC-052825

Basement – Throughout (Except

Bathroom) Brown Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

52B-CC-052825

Basement – Throughout (Except

Bathroom) Brown Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

53A-CC-052825

Basement – Throughout (Except

Bathroom) White Thinset Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

53B-CC-052825

Basement – Throughout (Except

Bathroom) White Thinset Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

54A-CC-052825 Basement – Bathroom Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

54B-CC-052825 Basement – Bathroom Tan 1’x1’ Floor Tile ND PLM

55A-CC-052825 Basement – Bathroom White Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

55B-CC-052825 Basement – Bathroom White Grout Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

56A-CC-052825 Basement – Bathroom White Thinset Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

56B-CC-052825 Basement – Bathroom White Thinset Associated with Tan

1’x1’ Floor Tile

ND PLM

57A-CC-052825 Basement – Center Gray Gypsum Wallboard (No T+J

Compound)

ND PLM

57B-CC-052825 Basement – Center Gray Gypsum Wallboard (No T+J

Compound)

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

57C-CC-052825 Basement – Center Gray Gypsum Wallboard (No T+J

Compound)

ND PLM

58A-CC-052825

2nd Floor – 3rd Floor Stair

Landing White Textured Wall ND PLM

58B-CC-052825

2nd Floor – 3rd Floor Stair

Landing White Textured Wall ND PLM

58C-CC-052825

2nd Floor – 3rd Floor Stair

Landing White Textured Wall ND PLM

59A-CC-052825 1st Floor – NE Room White Gypsum Wallboard ND PLM

59B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Gypsum Wallboard ND PLM

59C-CC-052825

2nd Floor – 3rd Floor Stair

Landing White Gypsum Wallboard ND PLM

59D-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room White Gypsum Wallboard ND PLM

59E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room White Gypsum Wallboard ND PLM

60A-CC-052825 1st Floor – NE Room White Tape and Joint Compound Associated with White Gypsum

Wallboard

ND PLM

60B-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen

White Tape and Joint Compound

Associated with White Gypsum Wallboard

ND PLM

60C-CC-052825

2nd Floor – 3rd Floor Stair

Landing

White Tape and Joint Compound Associated with White Gypsum

Wallboard

ND PLM

60D-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room White Tape and Joint Compound Associated with White Gypsum

Wallboard

ND PLM

60E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – W Room

White Tape and Joint Compound

Associated with White Gypsum Wallboard

ND PLM

61A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NW Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

61B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

61C-CC-052825 2nd Floor – SE Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

61D-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

61E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room White Plaster Wall Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

62A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NW Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

62B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

62C-CC-052825 2nd Floor – SE Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

62D-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

62E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Gray Plaster Wall Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

63A-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NW Room

Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Wallboard

System Behind Plaster Wall (Plaster Walls @ 2nd, 3rd Floor Only)

ND PLM

63B-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Wallboard

System Behind Plaster Wall (Plaster Walls @ 2nd, 3rd Floor Only)

ND PLM

63C-CC-052825 2nd Floor – SE Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Wallboard

System Behind Plaster Wall (Plaster

Walls @ 2nd, 3rd Floor Only)

ND PLM

63D-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room

Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Wallboard

System Behind Plaster Wall (Plaster Walls @ 2nd, 3rd Floor Only)

ND PLM

63E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Wallboard

System Behind Plaster Wall (Plaster Walls @ 2nd, 3rd Floor Only)

ND PLM

64A-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room White Plaster Ceiling Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

64B-CC-052825 1st Floor – SE Room White Plaster Ceiling Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

64C-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen White Plaster Ceiling Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

64D-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room White Plaster Ceiling Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

64E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room White Plaster Ceiling Skim Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

65A-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room Gray Plaster Ceiling Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

65B-CC-052825 1st Floor – SE Room Gray Plaster Ceiling Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

65C-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Gray Plaster Ceiling Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

65D-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room Gray Plaster Ceiling Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

65E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Gray Plaster Ceiling Rough Coat

(Plaster Over 3-Ply Gypsum Board)

ND PLM

66A-CC-052825 1st Floor – SW Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Board System

Behind Plaster Ceiling

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

66B-CC-052825 1st Floor – SE Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Board System

Behind Plaster Ceiling

ND PLM

66C-CC-052825 1st Floor – Kitchen Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Board System

Behind Plaster Ceiling

ND PLM

66D-CC-052825 2nd Floor – NE Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Board System

Behind Plaster Ceiling

ND PLM

66E-CC-052825 3rd Floor – E Room Gray 3-Ply Gypsum Board System

Behind Plaster Ceiling

ND PLM

67A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Face 1st Floor White New Repair Window Glazing

Compound

ND/ND PLM/TEM

67B-CC-052825 Exterior – E Face 1st Floor White New Repair Window Glazing

Compound

ND PLM

68A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Face 1st Floor White/Gray Original Window

Glazing Compound

ND/0.043%

Anthophyllite

PLM/TEM

68B-CC-052825 Exterior – S Face 1st Floor White/Gray Original Window Glazing

Compound

ND PLM

69A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Face 2nd Floor Tan Original Window Glazing

Compound

ND/ND PLM/TEM

69B-CC-052825

Exterior – N Face 1st Floor-2nd

Floor Landing

Tan Original Window Glazing

Compound

ND PLM

70A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Porch Roof Gray Single Layer Rood Shingle ND/ND PLM/TEM

70B-CC-052825 Exterior – W Addition Roof Gray Single Layer Rood Shingle ND PLM

71A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Porch Roof Black Vapor Paper Under Gray

Single Layer Roof Shingle

ND/ND PLM/TEM

71B-CC-052825 Exterior – W Addition Roof Black Vapor Paper Under Gray

Single Layer Roof Shingle

ND PLM

72A-CC-052825 Exterior – North Entrance Roof Top Layer Green Shingle Over

Original Red Shingle Layer

ND/ND PLM/TEM

72B-CC-052825 Exterior – North Entrance Roof Top Layer Green Shingle Over

Original Red Shingle Layer

ND PLM

73A-CC-052825 Exterior – North Entrance Roof Original Red Shingle Layer Below

Green Shingle

ND/ND PLM/TEM

73B-CC-052825 Exterior – North Entrance Roof Original Red Shingle Layer Below

Green Shingle

ND PLM

74A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Porch Roof Black Tar Roof Seal Between Shingle and Siding (Visibly Same Material as

Chimney Flashing)

ND/ND PLM/TEM

74B-CC-052825 Exterior – E Porch Roof Black Tar Roof Seal Between Shingle and Siding (Visibly Same Material as

Chimney Flashing)

ND PLM

75A-CC-052825 SAMPLE OMITTED

75B-CC-052825 SAMPLE OMITTED

Asbestos

Content

Analysis

Method

76A-CC-052825 Exterior – E Face Black Vapor Paper Under Silver

Paper Behind White Vinyl Siding

ND/ND PLM/TEM

76B-CC-052825 Exterior – W Face lack Vapor Paper Under Silver Paper

Behind White Vinyl Siding

ND PLM

ND = None Detected

NA/Pos Stop = Not Analyzed/Positive Stop

Table 2

Summary of Identified Asbestos-Containing Materials and Materials Containing <1% Asbestos Inventory

Location Material Type Asbestos Content Estimated

Total Quantity Comments

1st Floor – Living Room Gray Interior Caulking Compound on Storm Windows 0.84% Anthophyllite 50 LF Mastic non-ACM

3rd Floor – W Room

Green 9”x9” Floor Tiles Below Green and White Patterned

Sheet Floor and associated black mastic

4% Chrysotile;

0.24% Chrysotile

275 SF

Exterior – E Face 1st

Floor

White/Gray Original Window

Glazing Compound 0.043% Anthophyllite 150 LF

LF = Linear Feet; SF = Square Feet

Table 3

Inventory of PCB Source Building Materials

Location Material Type PCB Content Estimated Total

Quantity

All Windows Exterior window caulking & glazing compounds Presumed PCB Bulk Product

Waste All Windows

Appendix A

Limitations

LIMITATIONS

Site: 261 Cook Avenue, Meriden, Connecticut

1. This inspection report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Meriden (the “Client”) and is subject to, and is issued in connection with the terms and conditions of the original Agreement and all of its provisions. Any use or reliance upon information provided in this report, without the specific written authorization of the Client and Fuss & O’Neill, Inc. (Fuss & O’Neill) shall be at the User's individual risk.

This report should not be used as an abatement specification. All quantities of materials identified during this inspection are approximate.

2. Fuss & O’Neill has obtained and relied upon information from multiple sources to form certain conclusions regarding likely environmental issues at and in the vicinity of the subject property in conducting this inspection. Except as otherwise noted, no attempt has been made to verify the accuracy or completeness of such information or verify compliance by any party with federal, state or local laws or regulations.

3. Fuss & O’Neill has obtained and relied upon laboratory analytical results in conducting the inspection.

This information was used to form conclusions regarding the types and quantities of ACM, LBP, and

PCBs that must be managed prior demolition activities that may disturb these materials at the Site. Fuss & O’Neill has not performed an independent review of the reliability of this laboratory data.

4. Unless otherwise noted, only suspect hazardous materials associated within or located on the building

(aboveground) were included in this inspection. Suspect hazardous materials may exist below the ground surface that were not included in the scope of work of this inspection. Fuss & O’Neill cannot guarantee all asbestos or suspect hazardous materials were identified within the areas included in the scope of work. Only visible and accessible areas were included in the scope of work for this inspection.

5. The findings, observations and conclusions presented in this report are limited by the scope of services outlined in our original Agreement (May 9, 2025), which reflects schedule and budgetary constraints imposed by Client. Furthermore, the assessment has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

6. The conclusions presented in this report are based solely upon information gathered by Fuss & O’Neill to date. Should further environmental or other relevant information be discovered at a later date, the Client should immediately bring the information to the Fuss & O’Neill’s attention. Based upon an evaluation and assessment of relevant information, Fuss & O’Neill may modify the letter report and its conclusions.

7. Fuss & O’Neill has obtained and relied upon information from multiple sources to form certain conclusions regarding likely environmental issues at and in the vicinity of the subject property in conducting this inspection. Except as otherwise noted, no attempt has been made to verify the accuracy or completeness of such information or verify compliance by any party with federal, state or local laws or regulations.

Appendix B

Fuss & O’Neill Inspector Licenses and Accreditations

Appendix C

Asbestos Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Form

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10083471Customer: Fuss & O'Neill One Financial Plaza, 15th Floor Hartford, CT 06103

Analysis:

Date Received:

Carlos Texidor

PLM

06/02/2025

Project: 261 Cook Ave. Meriden, CT 20170932.C89 Date Reported: 06/04/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrou…