LSJ _Redacted.pdf

PDF 193 KB Posted

Attached to
Up to 6 month lease of 46 MFD's for various Japan locations
Solicitation number
SP7000-23-P-0076
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

CONTRACTING SERVICES OFFICE

5404 J AVENUE, BLDG 404

NEW CUMBERLAND, PA 17070-5059

Date

Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition IAW FAR 13.106-1(b)

1. Nature and/or description of the action being approved:

2. A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs (including he

An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition:

4. A demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited:

January 6, 2023

DLA Document Services has a need to issue a 4 month (Feb 01, 2023 - May 31, 2023), with two option months for Jun 1, 2023 - Jul 31, 2023, extension contract to continue services for SP7000-18-F-0073, without using competitive procedures. Original contract provided for leased multi-functional devices (MFDs), full service maintenance, all consumable supplies (excluding paper), key operator training, networking functionality, security accreditation along with technical and network installation support is required for OCONUS

5. A description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by Subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under 5.202 applies:

6. A description of the market research conducted (see Part 10) and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted:

7. Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition, such as:

• Explanation of why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed or are not available.

• When 6.302-1 is cited for follow-on acquisitions as described in 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), an estimate of the cost to the

Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived.

• Include a copy of the previous justification.

• The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on acquisition shall be approved by the approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR 6.304). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), the approval remains at the SPE level. DFARS PGI

206.304 (a)(s-70)(ii)

• When 6.302-2 is cited, data, estimated cost, or other rationale as to the extent and nature of the harm to the Government.

8. A listing of the sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition (Include the results of the request for information or the sources sought notification in accordance with DFARS PGI 206.302-1 or include the waiver from the HCA or designee):

23-RFI-1006 posted to SAM.gov on 1/17/2023

None

9. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required:

I certify that any supporting data that is the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel and which form a basis for the justification are complete and accurate.

Technical Personnel

Approval:

The justification, as presented above, is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Additionally, I have determined that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

C

Competition Advocate (Above $700K but not exceeding $13.5 million)

Head of the Procuring Activity (Above $13.

5 million but not exceeding $93 million)

Senior Procurement Executive (Above $93 m illion and as required by DFARS PGI 206.304(a)(S-70)(ii))

Due to highly specialized supplies or services a competitive contract action for these devices is not possible as the devices are being leased from Fuji Xerox who is the only vendor capable to continue the lease of the existing equipment.

The follow on requirement has been competed and awarded however delivery has been delyed. This order is being put in place long enough until the follow on devices' new order period of performance to commence.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .