Logic Model Template (4).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Ukraine - Integration of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)
Opportunity number
SFOP0009856
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains a logic model template and information on a related federal grant opportunity from the Department of State Bureau of Conflict Stabilization Operations. The logic model template provides a framework for applicants to outline program goals, objectives, activities, outputs, outcomes, and assumptions. It instructs users to include both qualitative and quantitative indicators, and notes that objectives and goals should be written as end states to be achieved rather than activity descriptions.

The federal grant opportunity is solicitation number SFOP0009856 to support the integration of internally displaced persons in Ukraine. It is assigned to the federal grant program titled "Conflict and Stabilization Operations" and aims to assist the Department of State's efforts to stabilize conflict-affected areas and countries. Eligible applicants should review the requirements and respond by the stated deadline to be considered for funding under this opportunity.

From the source

Logic Model

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FAQ - SFOP0009856 - Ukraine IDP Integration (v20230810).pdf PDF
Budget Guidance and Template for New Awards (Oct 2020) (4).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Past Performance Reference Template_NOFO (4).docx DOCX document
GANTT Work Plan Template (4).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Proposal Submission Instructions (2022) (4).docx DOCX document
Standard F Gender Indicators UPDATED (3).docx DOCX document
3.7.G. Data Collection Guidance (3).docx DOCX document
Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) - SFOP0009856 - STATE - CSO - Ukraine IDP Integration [SAMS v20230612] (2).pdf PDF
Gender Analysis Sample Questions for NOFO Applicants (4).pdf PDF
Combatting Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Policy - 2020 (2).pdf PDF
CSO GAOC Tool + GWI GA Template (June 2021)[3172] (3).pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Sheet1

Program Title:
Program Logic Model
LevelOutcome/Output IndicatorsData Collection ToolsRisks and Assumptions
Goal: (overarching envisioned end-state)
Overall Theory of Change: IF we do x/y/z, THEN we will achieve a/b/c BECAUSE (project assumptions)
Theory of Change 1: (relates to Objective 1 logic frame)
Objective 1: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal)OutCOME 1.1:

Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:

include both qualitative and quantitative indicators OutCOME 1.2:

Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:

this section might include important intermediate outcomes that are short of objective but bridge several activities

Activity 1.1:OutPUT 1.1.1:
OutCOME 1.1.2:

Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:

add additonal outcome indicators as appropriate

Activity 1.2:OutPUT 1.2.1:
OutCOME 1.2.2:
Theory of Change 2: (relates to Objective 2 logic frame)
Objective 2: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal)OutCOME 2.1:
OutCOME 2.2:
Activity 2.1:OutPUT 2.1.1:
OutCOME 2.1.2:
Activity 2.2:OutPUT 2.2.1:
OutCOME 2.2.2:
Theory of Change 3: (relates to Objective 3 logic frame)
Objective 3: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal)Outcome 3.1:
Outcome 3.2:
Activity 3.1:OutPUT 3.1.1:
OutCOME 3.1.2:
Activity 3.2:OutPUT 3.2.1:
OutCOME 3.2.2:
Notes: Adjust number of objectives and activities as needed. Objectives and goal must be worded as end-states to be achieved, not restatements of activities. There should be a minimum of one output and one outcome per activity, as well as at least one outcome at the objective level. Add more levels of outcomes if appropriate for monitoring needs or tracing causal processes, but keep number of indicators managable.

Sheet2

Sheet3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .