Limited Source Justification_Opto22 Brand Name Redacted.pdf
PDF 961 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Libby Dam Generic Data Acquisition and Control System (GDACS) Equipment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912DW24Q0019
About this file
This document contains a limited source justification and related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The limited source justification identifies Opto 22 as the required brand for compatibility with the existing Generic Data Acquisition and Control System infrastructure at Libby Dam. Introducing an alternative brand would incur substantial costs, require extensive programming and compliance efforts, and potentially impact system performance or timelines. The related solicitation from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers seeks Opto 22 and Potter & Brumfield products for the Libby Dam GDACS equipment upgrade. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses and requires delivery by 90 days after award to Libby Dam during specified hours. Award will be made to the lowest priced responsible vendor quoting conforming products.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912DW24Q0019 GDACS Equipment Brand Name.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Branch's automated processes. The Opto 22 brand's I/O (input/output) data acquisition and control brand is a unique fit for GDACS requirements, ensuring a seamless integration with the existing system. The ACCS Branch has automated configurations tailored to Opto 22 components, making it the only viable option for the upgrade.
Additionally, the current field administrator support staff possesses significant experience and training with Opto 22 branded equipment. Opting for another brand would necessitate additional training and adaptation efforts, potentially impacting the efficiency and effectiveness of the GDACS system.
Opto 22 equipment aligns with ACCS's automated configurations and adheres to existing cyber guidelines. Introducing alternative equipment would incur substantial costs, programming efforts, and cyber compliance challenges. Opto 22 is recognized as the most suitable choice, maintaining the integrity of the overall system, preventing potential hardware failures, and ensuring adequate system support from the manufacturer.
Impact for not Using Limited Source for Opto 22 Brand Name: Choosing a different brand would introduce significant costs, including the need for extensive programming and cyber compliance efforts. The impact would extend beyond financial considerations, potentially affecting the timeline of the upgrade and the overall performance of the GDACS system.
The current Opto 22-based GDACS system is finely tuned to the specific requirements and configurations of the USACE infrastructure. Introducing a different brand would require complete replacement, testing, and verification of the currently installed system, posing operational risks and potential disruptions.
Opto 22 equipment is supported by existing maintenance and support structures. Opting for an alternative would necessitate establishing new support mechanisms, potentially leading to delays in issue resolution and system maintenance.
6. BASIS FOR RESTRICTING COMPETITION: Opto 22 is identified as the required choice due to specific compatibility requirements with the existing GDACS infrastructure. The unique features and functionalities of Opto 22 allow it to seamlessly integrate with the current system. Seeking a separate, like product other than the brand name Opto 22 would prove incompatible with the existing USACE infrastructure and the equipment in place. This assessment is based on the intricate configurations and compatibility requirements of the GDACS system, where introducing a different brand could result in operational challenges, potential system failures, and increased costs associated with system replacement and verification.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .