Limited Competition Justification - Final_Redacted.pdf
PDF 394 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W50S88-25-Q-0119
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document is a Justification Review Document and Single Source Determination for a Schneider Electric Power Monitoring Expert (PME) Software Upgrade for the National Guard Bureau. The procurement is for a software upgrade to keep up with ongoing Information Technology updates at the 119th Wing, requiring 7 new meters and new versions of Microsoft Windows. The upgrade is sole-sourced from Schneider Electric due to its proprietary software being the only solution that meets the specific requirements, with no other viable sources identified through market research.
The contract is a new, firm fixed-price acquisition under O&M Air funding, with the 119 MSG/MSC as the contracting activity. The justification emphasizes that procuring software from another manufacturer would result in substantial duplication of financial resources and risk losing existing software functionality. The document indicates this is the first procurement of this specific software, and the contract is planned for September 24, 2025, with Schneider Electric identified as the large business vendor.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Quote Sheet.pdf | ||
| Combo RFQ - Schneider Electric PME Upgrade.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SEPTEMBER 23, 2025 CUI//SP-SSEL 3 of 3
CUI//SP-SSEL
business interested parties. Only one source demonstrated the ability to potentially meet this requirement, but could not be verified as a source that is able to meet this requirement this fiscal year and it therefore, not a viable source. To date, no other sources have written to express interest.
e. Other Facts ⋯
None
9. REQUIRING ACTIVITY CERTIFICATION
Technical and Requirements I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the justification, are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Name Date Title
11. APPROVAL
Contracting Officer (KO)
1. I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the government for this contract action will be Fair and Reasonable.
2. I certify that this Justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(This certification shall be made by the contracting Officer who will sign the contract resulting from this Justification and Approval.)
Name Date Phone
12. REDACTION INSTRUCTIONS
After completion and signatures, print to PDF. Then redact items such as, but not limited to:
1. Dollar amounts.
2. Names.
3. Signatures.
4. Proprietary information.
FAR 5.401, FAR 24.1, and FAR 24.2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .