Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-121825A Lighting Engineering and Design Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000503
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form utilized by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on completed projects. The form is designed to evaluate consultant performance across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The evaluation covers the consultant's ability to manage resources including manpower, equipment, and subconsultants; work independently on routine tasks; remain within the contracted scope of work; and communicate and cooperate effectively with agency staff. The form also assesses whether the consultant completed deliverables by agreed-upon dates, produced complete and accurate documentation with minimal revisions, and stayed within budget constraints.

The evaluation utilizes a five-point rating scale where 5 indicates exceeding requirements and expectations, 3 indicates meeting requirements and expectations, and 1 indicates failure to meet requirements and expectations, with N/A as an option when applicable. Evaluators must provide justification for scores in each section, and the form allows for consultant response to the evaluation. The scoring methodology applies weighted values based on the number of ratings provided, with single ratings valued at 50 points for a score of 5, 30 points for a score of 3, and 10 points for a score of 1. The form requires signatures from the Agency/Owner PM, Consultant PM, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, establishing formal documentation of project performance for future reference and consultant qualification assessments.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .