LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-121825A Lighting Engineering and Design Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000503
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The Management section assesses resource management, consultant independence, scope adherence, and communication with GDOT staff across four factors. The Prosecution and Progress section evaluates three factors: timely completion of deliverables, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance. The evaluation uses a five-point scale where 5 indicates exceeding requirements, 3 indicates meeting requirements, and 1 indicates failure to meet requirements, with an N/A option where applicable. The form includes fields for the evaluation date, GDOT Project Identification Number, Project Manager information, Agency details, project description, phase, and service dates.

The scoring methodology assigns weighted point values based on the number of ratings within each section, with higher scores corresponding to better performance ratings. The form requires justification from the GDOT PM or Subject Matter Expert for all scores and includes space for consultant response. Signature blocks and acknowledgment sections are mandatory for both GDOT and consultant representatives, with additional Assistant Office Head and Office Head acknowledgment required if any factor receives a rating of 1. This evaluation instrument serves as a performance monitoring tool to document consultant compliance and quality of work delivery on GDOT-administered projects.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .