Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-121825A Lighting Engineering and Design Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000529
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on local projects. The form captures evaluation data including the consultant name, GDOT project identification number, project manager information, and project phase details. The evaluation encompasses two primary rating categories: Management (encompassing resource management, independent work capability, scope adherence, and communication/cooperation) and Prosecution and Progress (addressing timely deliverable completion, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance). Each factor is scored on a scale where 5 represents exceeding requirements, 3 meets requirements, 1 does not meet requirements, or N/A if not applicable. The form includes designated sections for justification of scores by the Agency/Owner Project Manager and allows for consultant response to the evaluation.

The scoring methodology employs a weighted calculation system that adjusts point values based on the number of rating factors completed, with individual ratings of 5, 3, or 1 corresponding to scaled values ranging from 50 to 2.5 points depending on the quantity of factors rated. The form requires signature acknowledgment from the Agency/Owner Project Manager, the Consultant Project Manager, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, with spaces for dates and any additional supervisor acknowledgment. This evaluation tool serves as a performance record for consultant oversight on Georgia state and local projects and contributes to the assessment of consultant capabilities for future contract opportunities.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_121825A Lighting Engineering Design S.pdf PDF
LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ 484_121825A_Lighting Engineering and Desi.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .