Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000529
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on local projects. The form captures evaluation data including the consultant name, GDOT project identification number, project manager information, and project phase details. The evaluation encompasses two primary rating categories: Management (encompassing resource management, independent work capability, scope adherence, and communication/cooperation) and Prosecution and Progress (addressing timely deliverable completion, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance). Each factor is scored on a scale where 5 represents exceeding requirements, 3 meets requirements, 1 does not meet requirements, or N/A if not applicable. The form includes designated sections for justification of scores by the Agency/Owner Project Manager and allows for consultant response to the evaluation.
The scoring methodology employs a weighted calculation system that adjusts point values based on the number of rating factors completed, with individual ratings of 5, 3, or 1 corresponding to scaled values ranging from 50 to 2.5 points depending on the quantity of factors rated. The form requires signature acknowledgment from the Agency/Owner Project Manager, the Consultant Project Manager, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, with spaces for dates and any additional supervisor acknowledgment. This evaluation tool serves as a performance record for consultant oversight on Georgia state and local projects and contributes to the assessment of consultant capabilities for future contract opportunities.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ 484_121825A Lighting Engineering Design S.pdf | ||
| LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ 484_121825A_Lighting Engineering and Desi.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Local Project Evaluation Form
Local Project Evaluation Form
Evaluation Date:
Consultant:
GDOT PI No.(if applicable):
GDOT PM (if applicable):
Agency/Owner:
Agency/Owner PM:
Phone:
Email:
Project Description & Scope:
Project Phase:
Service Dates:
Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation
| A | Management | Rating | Factor | ||
| 1 | Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.) | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 2 | Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 3 | Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 4 | Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
| B | Prosecution and Progress | Rating | Factor | ||
| 5 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 6 | All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 7 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
Total Score: 0
| Agency/Owner PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: | |
| Supervisor's Acknowledgement: |
| Consultant PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
| Agency Evaluator's | ||
| Supervisor (if applicable): | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
&12&A Page &P of &N
Scoring
| 1 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| N/A | |||||
| Factor Table | |||||
| Section Value: | 50 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | Ratings | 50.00 | 30.00 | 10.00 | |
| 2 | Ratings | 25.00 | 15.00 | 5.00 | |
| 3 | Ratings | 16.67 | 10.00 | 3.33 | |
| 4 | Ratings | 12.50 | 7.50 | 2.50 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .