Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-082426 GEC and OVF Services for I-75 South Express Lanes PI #0020636
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000616
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local projects, specifically for the I-75 South Express Lanes General Engineering Consulting (GEC) and Owner's Verification Firm (OVF) Services contract (PI #0020636). The form provides a structured evaluation framework with two primary rating categories: Management (Factor A) and Prosecution and Progress (Factor B). The evaluation captures consultant performance across criteria including resource management, independent work capability, scope adherence, communication and responsiveness, timely deliverable completion, quality and accuracy of work products, and budget performance. The form accommodates various project phases and service date ranges, with fields for the evaluation date, GDOT project information, agency contact details, project description, and scope documentation.

The evaluation employs a five-point rating scale where 5 indicates exceeds requirements, 3 meets requirements, 1 does not meet requirements, and N/A indicates not applicable. The scoring methodology assigns weighted values to responses, with management factors weighted at 60 total points and prosecution/progress factors weighted at 40 total points, yielding a maximum total score of 100 points. The form requires mandatory justifications for all scores from the Agency/Owner Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert, accommodates consultant responses to evaluations, and includes signature lines for the Agency/Owner PM, Consultant PM, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor for accountability and documentation purposes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ 484_082426 GEC and OVF Services for I_75.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.100
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.5200
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.100
3Ratings
Sub Total:20
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.3150
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.3150
2Ratings
Sub Total:30
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 50

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:60531
0Ratings000
1Ratings60300
2Ratings30150
3Ratings20100
4Ratings1580

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .