Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-121825 Lighting Engineering and Design Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000477
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on projects. The form is completed by the Agency/Owner Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert following project completion or at specified intervals. It evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management (factors assessing resource management, independence, scope adherence, and communication) and Prosecution and Progress (factors assessing timeliness of deliverables, quality and completeness of work products, and budget compliance). Each factor is rated on a scale of 5 (Exceeds Requirement and Expectation), 3 (Meets Requirement and Expectation), 1 (Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation), or N/A. The form requires justification for all scores and allows for consultant response to the evaluation.

The scoring methodology applies weighted values based on the number of ratings within each category, with ratings scaled to produce a total project score. Signatures are required from the Agency/Owner Project Manager, the Consultant Project Manager, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor (if applicable), with fields for evaluation date, project description, service dates, and project phase documentation. This evaluation form serves as a performance record and quality control mechanism for GDOT and local agency projects, providing objective data on consultant performance for future contract considerations and performance management purposes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ 484_121825 Lighting Engineering and Desig.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .