LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-121825 Lighting Engineering and Design Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000477
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on transportation projects across Region 1 counties in Districts 1, 6, and 7, and Region 2 counties in Districts 2, 3, 4, and 5. The form evaluates lighting engineering and design services through a structured rating system applied at project completion or specified evaluation intervals. The evaluation captures project identification information including the GDOT Project Identification Number, project manager details, agency information, project description, phase, and service dates. The assessment period and consultant name are documented to establish clear accountability and performance tracking.

The evaluation form employs a three-tiered scoring system across two primary rating categories: Management (four factors) and Prosecution and Progress (three factors). Management factors assess resource appropriateness, consultant independence, scope adherence, and communication/cooperation with GDOT staff. Prosecution and Progress factors evaluate timeliness of deliverables, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance. Ratings of 5 indicate exceeds requirements, 3 indicates meets requirements, and 1 indicates does not meet requirements, with scores calculated using a weighted formula based on the number of factors rated. GDOT Project Manager and Supervisor acknowledgements are required when any factor receives a rating of 1, and the form includes space for consultant response and local agency comments, with final sign-off required from both GDOT PM and consultant PM representatives.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_121825 Lighting Engineering and Desig.pdf PDF
Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .