LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-092826 On-Call Engineering Support Services for Cable Stayed Bridge and Tunnels
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000622
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary categories: Management Rating and Prosecution and Progress Rating. The Management Rating section assesses resource management, consultant independence from agency staff, adherence to scope of work, and communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel. The Prosecution and Progress Rating section evaluates whether deliverables were completed by agreed-upon dates, the completeness and accuracy of invoices and reports, and budget compliance. The evaluation uses a five-point rating scale where 5 indicates exceeds requirements, 3 meets requirements, and 1 does not meet requirements, with an N/A option available. Each section produces subtotals that contribute to an overall project score.

The form includes signature and acknowledgment lines for the GDOT Project Manager, consultant Project Manager, agency evaluator's supervisor, and required acknowledgments from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head if any item receives a rating of 1. The scoring methodology applies weighted point values based on the number of rated factors, with single-factor ratings valued at 50 points for a score of 5, 10 points for a score of 1, and zero points for N/A designations. The form includes space for justifications of scores by the GDOT PM and responses from the consultant, allowing for documented feedback on performance throughout the project lifecycle.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ_484_092826 On_Call Engineering Support Se.pdf PDF
Legacy Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .