LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-081726 CEI Services for SR 316 Bundles 1, 2, and 3
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000614
Issued by
Barrow County, Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The Management section assesses four factors including resource management, consultant independence, adherence to scope of work, and communication and cooperation with GDOT staff. The Prosecution and Progress section evaluates three factors covering timeliness of deliverables, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance. Each factor is rated on a scale where 5 exceeds requirements, 3 meets requirements, and 1 does not meet requirements, with an N/A option available. The form requires justification from the GDOT Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert for all scores and allows for consultant response to evaluations.

The evaluation form includes a scoring table that calculates weighted values based on the number of rated factors, with scores of 1, 3, or 5 producing corresponding point values. The form requires signatures and acknowledgments from the GDOT Project Manager, Supervisor, Consultant Project Manager, and Agency Evaluator's Supervisor. Additional acknowledgments from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head are mandatory if any factor receives a rating of 1. The form is designed to provide a standardized evaluation methodology for GDOT's assessment of consultant performance on locally administered projects, with documentation of both agency findings and consultant responses included in the formal evaluation record.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_081726 CEI Services for SR 316 Bundle.pdf PDF
Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .