LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-062226 Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services, District 4 - Tifton
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000586
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local projects. The form is designed to evaluate Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services, specifically for District 4 in Tifton, Georgia. The evaluation framework measures consultant performance across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The Management section assesses resource management, consultant independence, scope adherence, and communication and cooperation with GDOT staff. The Prosecution and Progress section evaluates whether deliverables were completed by agreed-upon dates, the quality and completeness of invoices, reports, and design requirements, and budget compliance. Each factor is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing exceeds requirements, 3 representing meets requirements, and 1 representing does not meet requirements.

The evaluation form utilizes a weighted scoring system that adjusts point values based on the total number of ratings submitted. For example, a single rating of 5 receives 50 points, a rating of 3 receives 30 points, and a rating of 1 receives 10 points, with diminishing point allocations as the number of ratings increases. The form requires justification from the GDOT Project Manager for all scores and includes provisions for consultant response to evaluations. If any factor receives a rating of 1, acknowledgment from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head is mandatory. The evaluation must be signed by the GDOT PM, Consultant PM, and Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, with additional space for supervisor acknowledgement and local comments.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_062226 CEI Services_ District 4 _ Tif.pdf PDF
Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .