Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-062226 Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services, District 4 - Tifton
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000586
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local contract projects. The form is designed to evaluate Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services contracts, specifically for District 4 in Tifton. The evaluation covers two primary rating categories: Management (Factor A) and Prosecution and Progress (Factor B), with a total possible score of 100 points. The form captures project details including the evaluation date, consultant name, GDOT Project Identification number, project description and scope, project phase, and service dates, allowing agencies to systematically document consultant performance across resource management, scope adherence, communication, schedule compliance, deliverable completeness, and budget performance.

The scoring system uses a five-point scale where 5 represents exceeding requirements and expectations, 3 represents meeting requirements and expectations, and 1 represents not meeting requirements and expectations, with an N/A option available. Individual rating factors are weighted with point values ranging from 60 to 10 points based on importance, requiring the Agency/Owner Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert to provide written justifications for all scores. The form mandates signatures from the Agency/Owner PM, the consultant PM, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor to ensure accountability and documentation of the evaluation process. This standardized evaluation tool enables GDOT to maintain consistent performance metrics for consultant selection and management on future CEI service contracts.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 484_062226 CEI Services_ District 4 _ Tif.pdf PDF
LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.100
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.5200
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.100
3Ratings
Sub Total:20
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.3150
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.3150
2Ratings
Sub Total:30
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 50

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:60531
0Ratings000
1Ratings60300
2Ratings30150
3Ratings20100
4Ratings1580

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .