Attachment_C_-_Annual_DO_Performance_Summary.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NATIVE GRASS AND FORB SEED INCREASE AND SUPPLY Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- L15PS00365
About this file
Attachment C
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_L15PS00365_Amd_000002.pdf | ||
| Sol_L15PS00365_Amd_000001.pdf | ||
| Sol_L15PS00365.pdf | ||
| Attachment_B_-__Grass.Seed.Forbs_Tables.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_A_-_Germplasm_ID_Term_and_Generations.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
TASK ORDER EVALUATION SUMMARY
| Contractor: | Address | Contract No: | Requesting Office: | Address | Task Order No: | Item Number | Item Description | Seed Order (Quanity) | Unit | Seed Order (Quanity) |
| Native Seed Farm | Easy Street 1A West, WA 99330 | L15PC00XXX | BLM Medford District | 3040 Biddle Rd. Medford, Oregon 97504 | 123456 | QTY |
Task Order Date: August 5, 2015
Sheet2 ATTACHMENT C Annual Delivery Order Performance Report
| Delivery Order Origin |
| Field Office Name |
| Bureau of Land Management |
| Medford District Office |
| 3040 Biddle Rd |
| Medford, Oregon 97504 |
| POC: Douglas Kendig |
| 541.261.3610 |
Contractor Contract No: Deliver No: Item Number Item Description Seed Amount Ordered (Quantity) Seed Amount Delivered (Quantity to Date) Unit Seed Quality Incentives Paid Performance Rating Performance Comments (Technical, Management and Administration Performance)
| Please complete the following by July 1 of each calendar year. |
| 1. Annual Delivery Order Performance Report |
| 2. Seed Analysis Report Copies |
| Contact: April Blodgett, Contract Specialist, Division of Natural Resources, Department of the Interior | Bureau of Land Management | National Operations Center Denver Federal Center | Bldg. 53, OC-663 | PO Box 25047, Denver, CO 80225 303-236-9433 | (f) 303-236-9470 Blodgett, April <ablodgett@blm.gov> |
| Adjectival Rating | Performance Rating Definition |
| Exceptional | Respondent is exceptional in all respects. The proposal fully addresses all aspects of the criterion and demonstrates approaches that add value above and beyond what is required for a good rating. Responses will normally evidence many significant strengths, no significant weaknesses, and a very high degree of relevance to the criterion. The Respondent convincingly demonstrates that the Government's performance requirements will be significantly exceeded. Comments noted by the SEP are described as excellent or superior and may note that innovative approaches were demonstrated in such a proposal. The probability of successfully performing the requirements of the contract is extremely high. |
| Good | Respondent is above average in all respects and addresses a majority of the elements of the criterion. Responses will normally evidence some significant strengths, few if any significant weaknesses, and a high degree of relevance to the criterion. The Respondent demonstrates that the Government's performance requirements will be exceeded. Comments noted by the SEP are described as above average or good. The probability of successfully performing the requirements of the contract is very high. |
| Satisfactory | Respondent is adequate overall; addresses most aspects of the criterion and demonstrates a likelihood of meeting the Government's performance requirements. Responses will normally evidence few if any strengths, few if any weaknesses, offsetting strengths and weaknesses, and a moderate degree of relevancy to the criterion (See Note below). Comments noted by the SEP are described as suitable, sufficient, okay, or adequate. The probability of successfully performing the requirements of the contract is high. |
| Marginal | Respondent is marginal in most respects; addresses only minor aspects of the criterion and doubt exists whether or not the Government's performance requirements will be met. Responses will normally evidence few strengths of any kind, some significant weaknesses and/or omissions, and a low degree of relevancy to the criterion. Comments noted by the SEP are described as faulty, substandard, or deficient. The probability of successfully performing the requirements of the contract is low. |
| Poor | Respondent fails to address the criterion and/or does not present evidence that indicates the likelihood of meeting the Government’s performance requirements. Responses will normally evidence no strengths and many significant weaknesses and/or omissions. Comments noted by the SEP are described as unsatisfactory, unacceptable, or careless. The probability of successfully performing the requirements of the contract is very low. |
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .