L15PS00024-25-IndustryDayQ AFinal.pdf

L1PS00024/25 NPR-A Legacy Well Remediation Program Industry Day

Questions & Answers January 7 & 8, 2015

Introduction This publication captures the questions posed and responses provided during the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA) Legacy Well Industry Day held January 7-8, 2015 (see the Special Notice and Statement of Objectives posted under L14PS00024/L14PS00025). As the Bureau of Land Management contemplates soliciting services to remediate NPRA Legacy Wells, the purpose of this event is to gather input from the community and industry to inform BLM’s next steps. Following this event, BLM may post a solicitation, the content of which may be entirely different from the information presented herein.

Table of Contents

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective Introduction/Context

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, General Scope Section

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Period of Performance Section

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Place of Performance Section

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Phase I Objectives Section

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Phase II Objectives Section

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Constraints Section

Questions pertaining to the acquisition strategy presented

Questions pertaining to potential source selection

Other Questions

Acronym Key https://www.fbo.gov/

No. Question Response

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective Introduction/Context 1 What is the regulatory driver that is driving this effort? Is there an

Administrative Consent Order between the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Governing this work?

The Bureau of Land Management has the responsibility to assess, plug, and clean up the wells remaining from exploratory work done by the US Navy and the US Geological Survey between 1944 and 1982. Of the 136 wells, there are 50 remaining that require action. ADEC, AOGCC and BLM are working collaboratively to ensure both the surface and subsurface are remediated appropriately.

2 Which agency that has ultimate authority for the Phase I and Phase II Scope and approval investigation and cleanup work plans and deliverables?

The BLM will issue all contracts and direct all work. BLM will ensure all surface clean-up work plans are approved by ADEC and all subsurface, plugging and abandonment design and remediation work meets AOGCC standards.

3 Did the current ADEC Regulatory Case Manager conduct the review and approval of the previous work plans and reports for the 18 well sites remediated/abandoned by BLM since 2002?

No.

4 Are the work plans and reports associated with the 18 well sites previously remediated/abandoned by BLM since 2002 available for review?

Please go to NPR-A Legacy Wells Program Contracting Information website, select ‘Request for Information on Past Plugging & Abandonment Efforts’.

5 What companies have worked on NPRA legacy wells that have been Plugged and Abandoned?

The most recent include: Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), Mahto, Marsh Creek, SLR, MacTec (Environmental), Olgoonik, SolstenXP

6 How will this project interface with work on Umiat and Simpson well remediation work currently being done by Army Corps of Engineers?

Umiat and surface work at Simpson Core Test 26, 30 and 30A are being expedited under an Interagency Agreement between the BLM and USACOE. Umiat work will occur this winter and the surface work at Simpson is scheduled for early summer 2015. Information gathered from these earlier projects (including site mapping, sampling techniques, Plugging & Abandonment strategies) will be useful for shaping future contracts. Future contractors may also choose to reference past work as well as contact previous contractors.

http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/prog/energy/oil_gas/npra/legacywell/Contracting_for_Clean_Up.html

7 Can we access information about the NPRA legacy wells that have been Plugged and Abandoned?

Yes. Please go to NPR-A Legacy Wells Program Contracting Information website, select ‘Request for Information on Past Plugging & Abandonment Efforts’.

8 Can we review successful proposals for work on legacy wells that has already been accomplished? Are there previous contracts done by BLM that the contractors are able to look at?

Yes. Please go to NPR-A Legacy Wells Program Contracting Information website, select ‘Request for Information on Past Plugging & Abandonment Efforts’.

9 Has Cultural Resource work been done on all of the legacy well sites? All of the well sites drilled by the Navy during the first period of exploration in the NPR-A (i.e., the 91 well sites that were drilled in the 1944-1952 timeframe) are covered under an existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Alaska State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) that allow for all clean-up activities to occur at all but one site--the Kaolak Test Well 1 (XUR-00202). The Kaolak site is not currently prioritized for clean-up as part of the current NPRA Legacy Well Strategic Plan, and no anticipated clean-up activity is expected to occur there. The remaining 45 Legacy Wells sites drilled by Husky Oil are not yet old enough to be considered under the National Historic Preservation Act, and clean-up can occur on these sites.

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, General Scope Section

Is the priority Barrow & Simpson? Both clusters of wells contain high priority sites.

11 Would BLM consider doing the ‘easy sites’ to show initial progress? Yes.

12 Would BLM provide guidance on prioritizing of well sites (beyond the information included in the 2013 NPRA Legacy Well Strategic Plan) given the fact that funds are limited relevant to the total number of wells inventoried that require additional remediation work? Would the coastal erosion analysis drive part of that prioritization analysis beyond the information included in the 2013 plan?

Yes, BLM will likely provide guidance regarding prioritizing sites initially during the solicitation phase and during each subsequent task order issuance. Prioritization is likely to change as coastal erosion and other environmental threats arise.

http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/prog/energy/oil_gas/npra/legacywell/Contracting_for_Clean_Up.html http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/prog/energy/oil_gas/npra/legacywell/Contracting_for_Clean_Up.html http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.87067.File.dat/Legacy_Well_Strategic_Plan_FINAL_09232013.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.87067.File.dat/Legacy_Well_Strategic_Plan_FINAL_09232013.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.87067.File.dat/Legacy_Well_Strategic_Plan_FINAL_09232013.pdf

13 Does BLM anticipate that the $50M would be sufficient for all 50 wells? While historical wells had reserve pits causing higher costs and these

50 wells do not, BLM still does not anticipate that the $50M will be sufficient to address all the remediation needs for the fifty sites. Given the age of the sites the number of unknowns, it is likely that challenges will arise around both surface and downhole site conditions that that will impact costs at each site.

14 Does BLM anticipate accompanying contractors on site? No direct constant oversight is anticipated at this time. BLM is required to witness the Plugging & Abandonment work and will have staff present for that phase. When determining space for a winter camp, accommodations for BLM personnel should be anticipated.

15 Does BLM anticipate any limitations for the use of helicopters? Contractors/permit applicants will be expected to describe in detail their use of equipment, including helicopters, during the land-use authorization process with the BLM. The NEPA analysis carried out by BLM may identify restrictions associated with helicopter use depending on a number of factors, including amount of use, location, and date. These restrictions would be included as stipulations to the permit authorizing the activity.

16 Has BLM considered the lead-time for vendors to schedule their resources in the current proposed time lines?

BLM believes that the anticipated timeline presented is aggressive.

Ultimately, it will be up to the Offerors to propose timelines for activity as part of their proposals.

17 Is the BLM considering performing feasibility studies or CERCLA risk assessments on sites, especially sites with larger known issues?

This has not yet been determined. Sites with known issues that may invoke CERCLA are outside of the initial/priority Barrow and Simpson clusters.

18 Will the contractor be required/permitted to negotiate requirements and approvals directly with ADEC/AOGCC or must all discussions and communications go through BLM?

BLM will be responsible for communicating with the ADEC and AOGCC directly. The contractor may be involved in discussions or meetings that occur with all parties in order for there to be effective communication regarding expectations.

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Period of Performance Section 19 Is the acquisition of the project funding the reason for establishing a 3-year base term and two, one-year options to complete the Phase I

SOW?

No.

20 How will the funding be distributed over the 5-year period of performance for the Phase I Performance Objectives?

Under the structure proposed at Industry Days, it would be via task orders.

21 Would you consider staggering the time frame for Phase II? Yes.

22 How will the funding be distributed for the Phase II Performance Objective?

Under the structure proposed at Industry Days, it would be via task orders.

23 When do you anticipate publishing the first solicitation?

Late February/early March, 2015.

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Place of Performance Section 24 Will modes of transportation be a factor? On BLM lands, tundra travel is restricted during summer months. No mode of transportation will be dictated.

25 Is Tulugeak one of the legacy wells under the anticipated contracts? No; BLM is monitoring Tulugeak at this time.

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Phase I Objectives Section 26 For Phase I will the priority of wells be according to the NPRA Legacy

Well Strategic Plan?

That is the intent. However, BLM will be open to alternative approaches that can maximize efficiencies and budget.

27 Has site characterization been done on other wells? A very limited amount of site characterization/testing has occurred at some of the Legacy Well sites, primarily those that have a reserve pit associated with the well. Many of the documents from past Legacy Wells work exist only as hard copy reports on file at the BLM Arctic Field Office and contain a limited amount of information. As time and workload allows, these documents will be scanned and uploaded to the BLM Legacy Wells website. However, all potential contractors are http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.87067.File.dat/Legacy_Well_Strategic_Plan_FINAL_09232013.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.87067.File.dat/Legacy_Well_Strategic_Plan_FINAL_09232013.pdf welcome to arrange a visit to the office in Fairbanks in order to look through the documents on file and make copies and/or take notes. To arrange a visit, please contact Stacie McIntosh (s05mcint@blm.gov;

907-474-2310

28 Once a site characterization is completed, is there a specific timeline by which it needs to be acted upon?

No.

29 Can multiple well sites (i.e. clusters) be bundled into a single comprehensive project Work Plan and Report based upon priority or geographic location to minimize the number of individual documents requiring review and regulatory approval in order to maintain the proposed work schedule?

A comprehensive plan for Phase I sampling and assessment could be a viable option (Stage I - determination of contaminant presence or absence). However, for those sites that move to Stage II, a comprehensive formal site clean-up plan will most likely be required for each site unique to its findings.

30 How would a successful proposal for Phase I look? This will be determined by the final solicitation and evaluation criteria.

31 Will there be third party oversight in the field on Phase I?

Third party oversight of Phase I work is not anticipated at this time.

32 Will Phase I address any of the downhole concerns? No, not as it is presented in the Statement of Objectives. Refer to the solicitation, if/when posted to see final determination.

33 What do you consider the surface element?

Generally speaking, the surface is the active layer of freeze and thaw above the level of permafrost, the depth of which will vary by site. Any contaminants identified for removal by a subsequent clean-up plan will be expected to be “chased” until the clean-up level specified by the plan is achieved which may extend down into the permafrost.

34 It appears that the definition of “surface contamination” differs between BLM and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). Can this be commonly defined?

Yes, this is noted as needing clarification prior to publishing the solicitation(s).

35 Are there sites with known contaminated soil?

Yes; the priority sites are believed to have minimal, Non-CERCLA soil contamination as indicated in the NPRA 2013 Legacy Well Summary Report.

mailto:s05mcint@blm.gov http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.71622.File.dat/Legacy_Wells_Summary_Report_2013_accessible.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.71622.File.dat/Legacy_Wells_Summary_Report_2013_accessible.pdf

36 Would Phase I have timelines associated with it for all wells? It is likely that BLM will set milestone goals for each project phase, and specific timelines will be developed by site or region based on the complexities of each.

37 Will Phase I involve any downhole design? As contemplated in the Statement of Objectives published, Phase I is restricted to determining the presence or absence of environmental contaminants, remedial investigation and site mapping. However, refer to the final solicitation publication for the final determination of phasing and statements of work or objectives.

38 Will BLM accompany field work in Phase I? No, it is not anticipated that BLM personnel will be present in the field with the successful offeror at this time.

39 Is there a likelihood there may be multiple, simultaneous mobilizations in Phase I?

Possibly, if the successful offeror’s proposal included simultaneous mobilizations as a solution.

40 Was the information presented in the NPRA 2013 Legacy Well Summary Report all done by the Federal government? Has ADEC completed any of the work presented in the report?

All of the information gathered and presented in the report was done directly or contracted by the Federal Government. ADEC was involved in a reserve pit sampling of the legacy wells in the early 1990s. ADEC signed a closure letter which closed the pits under the terms that their condition did not change (i.e. breach).

41 Is there a set priority for Phase I? The NPRA Legacy Well Strategic Plan has set forth a suggested priority for those wells known to pose the highest risk. Beyond the wells named as priorities in the Strategic Plan, no set priorities have been established and BLM will be seeking the most cost-effective approach.

42 Would you consider opening Phase I to full and open competition rather than setting it aside? Would BLM contemplate contracting to a large business under Phase I?

That has not yet been determined. As with all federal agencies, BLM works with the Small Business Association (SBA) to determine which requirements are appropriate for small business set-asides. Information obtained at Industry Day and through market research assist in that determination.

http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.71622.File.dat/Legacy_Wells_Summary_Report_2013_accessible.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.71622.File.dat/Legacy_Wells_Summary_Report_2013_accessible.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.87067.File.dat/Legacy_Well_Strategic_Plan_FINAL_09232013.pdf

43 Would BLM consider multiple awards in Phase I? Possibly, please refer to the posted solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

44 Will BLM consider new technology for Phase I? Yes, BLM will consider new technology in an Offeror’s proposed solution.

45 Would BLM consider completing all of Phase I on all 50 wells to determine full extent of risk of coastal erosion and contamination prior to initiating Phase II downhole work?

No. Plugging and abandonment and solid waste removal at the Legacy Well locations were the primary drivers in securing Helium Act funding.

However, consideration has been given for Phase I to continue beyond the specific wells listed in the strategic plan.

46 Has BLM considered the need to send samples to accredited laboratories for analysis out of state in their projected timeline?

Yes, it is anticipated that initial reporting will include preliminary test results.

47 ADEC requires a full ‘Work Plan’ for approval; how will this be accommodated in the current formulation of Phase I and Phase II?

Phase I contractor will need to coordinate a Site Clean Up Plan with ADEC per the Statement of Objectives, while the Phase II contractor will coordinate the P&A design with ADEC separately. Note: Clarification between ‘Work Plan’ and ‘Site Clean Up Plan’ - The Work Plan (which is approved in conjunction with ADEC) is developed prior to sampling to include a contractor’s methodology and proposed sampling locations; whereas the Site Clean Up Plan required as a deliverable in Phase I would be developed after the results from both the sampling and testing efforts, as well as the mapping of the solid waste. The latter will result in either the Simple or the Complex Plan deliverable as defined in the SOO and will be provided to the contractor in Phase II to fulfill.

48 For the Site Cleanup Work Plan (Item V of the Phase I SOW), is the Phase I contractor required to obtain approval of the work plan as part of their authorized SOW; or is that part of the SOW to be completed by the Phase II Contractor? (Note that Item 5b on page 5 of 8 indicates that the Site Cleanup Work Plan will be presented to ADEC, but does not indicate that regulatory approval is part of the Phase I Objectives).

The Phase I contractor will have to initiate the Work Plan to ensure sampling methods and locations meet ADEC and BLM requirements.

The Phase II Contractor will be working under the same Work Plan and will conduct remediation as necessary. The BLM will be the initial point of contact and check for the Work Plan to ensure completeness prior to presenting the plan to ADEC.

49 Does the Phase I project deliverables (Phase I Work Plans, Reports and Site Cleanup Work Plan) require approval from ADEC, AOGCC and BLM?

Approval would not be needed from the AOGCC for Phase I. Approval is required from BLM, who will coordinate approval with ADEC.

50 Are generic (ADEC Method One or Two) or site specific (risk assessment) cleanup standards to be used to evaluate site closure or the need to implement additional work?

This will be determined after the initial site assessment and sampling as part of Phase I.

51 During the implementation of the Phase I field activities, should the selected contractor be collecting additional well related data that extends beyond the environmental cleanup aspects (down hole well data or casing inspections) to assist the Phase II contractor develop their P&A SOW? This would streamline preparation of the Phase II SOW who will otherwise require site visits to prepare their phase II

SOW.

It is not anticipated that Phase I contractors will collect the data indicated in this question with regard to the well.

52 Should an Electromagnetic survey (or similar) be conducted during the Phase I scope to identify buried debris? Similarly can we conduct borehole geophysics to determine integrity of casing and how product is seeping into different zones within the permafrost and active layers?

Contractors are encouraged to propose what they believe would be the best methods to employ to identify debris at the Legacy Well sites.

53 Should the Community Outreach Plan be included in the Phase I Objective?

Contractors are encouraged to include a description of anticipated community engagement and experience in carrying our community engagement with their submittal.

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Phase II Objectives Section 54 What is the focus for getting Phase II going?

The primary driver of the schedule for Phase II is the winter tundra-access season. Phase II will require equipment that can only be mobilized during the winter. Ideally, plugging & abandonment work would commence during the 2015-2016 winter operational season.

55 Has BLM contemplated third party oversight for Phase II to assure that the remediation developed under Phase I occurs accordingly?

Yes.

56 Is it envisioned that the winning Phase I contractor would be present during the plugging and abandoning Phase II?

No.

57 Do any of the wells identified in the Strategic Plan as priorities have reserve pits?

No.

58 Are you concerned about seep areas? Several of the Legacy Wells are located in or adjacent to naturally occurring oil seeps. The BLM’s only concern regarding seeps is that during the clean-up process on wells near seeps, no activity occurs that would result in the seep becoming destabilized.

59 If the land is not under BLM’s jurisdiction, is the Phase II Plugging and Abandoning work limited to the winter season?

No. That is up to the surface owner. However, if overland access requires crossing BLM or State lands, it likely will not be authorized.

60 Is Plugging & Abandonment survey and design envisioned as a Phase II task?

61 Is there a need for a Professional Engineer for Phase II to ascertain wellhead specifications such as caliper measurements, well-head components status, as this is an activity that needs to be done ahead of the winter work? Would BLM consider a site assessment stage for this?

Yes, a petroleum engineer would be critical to obtain these wellhead measurements as well as evaluate the wellhead and its components.

These measurements and evaluation should be taken by the vendor who would perform the Plugging & Abandonment.

62 After the Plugging and Abandonment action is completed by the selected contractor, will long term monitoring be necessary? If so, how will monitoring be done? Will it be contracted out?

Monitoring for the Plugging & Abandonment will be necessary until stability is achieved. Monitoring times will vary, but are typically 1-3 years. A single site visit per summer season is usually sufficient. If there is a problem, corrective actions will be necessary. This monitoring will be handled by the contractor with final verification from

BLM.

63 Is it possible that soil testing and analytics will be needed during Phase II?

Any sites that have identified contaminants during Phase I that result in a formal clean-up plan that will be implemented in Phase II will be required to utilize verification testing as part of the clean-up to determine that the specified level has been achieved.

64 Will BLM be relying on contractor support for the Community Outreach plan(s) or will this be a BLM role?

It is anticipated that Community Outreach Plans will be included in work statements as a responsibility of the Contractor.

65 Will Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) be reviewing and evaluating the downhole remediation plans at the same time as BLM?

The AOGCC will review the sundries submitted to BLM for concurrence and comment.

66 What is the role of BLM’s petroleum engineer?

They will review the proposed Plugging & Abandonment plans along with the AOGCC upon submission of the sundry notices. They will also be available for consultation as necessary.

67 Do any of the sites have a well cellar?

Most wells have a cellar as it was common practice of the Navy to enclose a shallow cellar while drilling to catch muds. Most early cellars are wooden. Refer to the NPRA 2013 Legacy Well Summary Report for a site description and photos of each site.

68 Is BLM aware of any presence of drilling muds with a high concentration of chrome or lead? Trace metals, asbestos?

Drilling muds are known to be present at most of the well sites. Any identified drilling muds should be sampled during Phase I to ascertain the presence of any chemicals or contaminants.

Questions pertaining to Statement of Objective, Constraints Section 69 Is BLM staffed to handle the projected level of activity? Can BLM keep up with the review of these plans?

Yes, BLM will have a dedicated legacy well remediation project coordinator, a petroleum engineer and a team of subject matter experts.

70 Given the desired timeline, why is a single award restricted to small business enterprises contemplated for Phase I?

A single award for Phase I would simplify contract award and administration and provide more consistent Phase I deliverables. Additionally, federal regulations require that when there is a reasonable expectation that offers will be obtained from at least two responsible small business concerns that requirement shall be set-aside for small business. BLM’s initial market research has indicated that Phase I may meet this reservation.

71 Will BLM consider a separate award for waste disposal?

Possibly. Refer to the posted solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.71622.File.dat/Legacy_Wells_Summary_Report_2013_accessible.pdf http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ak/aktest/energy/leagacy_wells.Par.71622.File.dat/Legacy_Wells_Summary_Report_2013_accessible.pdf

72 Has BLM considered negotiating for the use of landfills on North

Slope? Could BLM approach the various Boroughs and have agreements established for contractor use?

No. Waste removal and disposal will be the responsibility of the responsible Offeror for all sites.

73 Are there seasonal restrictions for Phase I work?

Yes. There will be a permitting process for each site that will include endangered species consultation. There may be restrictions depending on the area, species and activities.

74 Is site access limited? Yes, tundra access is restricted in the summer on BLM lands. Contractors will be required to obtain a land-use authorization from the BLM to conduct work on BLM lands and all other required federal, state, and local permits as may be applicable.

Questions pertaining to the acquisition strategy presented 75 Will all of the prime contracts for this project be issued and managed by BLM?

Yes, with the exception of work currently being done on the Umiat wells by the US Army Corps of Engineers under an existing Interagency Agreement.

76 Does BLM envision having one contractor for Phase I and a different contractor for Phase II?

The approach proposed for industry feedback included a competitive solicitation (small business set-aside) for Phase I, resulting in one award. For Phase II, a full and open competitive solicitation would result in multiple Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contractors. The successful offeror from Phase I may not be eligible for award under Phase II due to organizational conflict of interests (OCIs). Refer to the posted solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

77 Why does BLM perceive a conflict of interest exists if Phase I contractors also hold a contract in Phase II?

Conflict of Interest definitions and standards are set forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 3. The BLM seeks to ensure fair and transparent competition for Phase II that does not favor or create a competitive advantage to the Phase I successful offeror.

78 In considering the issue of conflict of interest, could the successful offeror from Phase I be a subcontractor or part of a joint-venture in a Phase II proposal?

Unlikely, however, refer to the posted solicitation publication(s) for the final determination of work phases and relevant Conflict of Interests rules.

79 How many IDIQ contracts do you anticipate awarding?

This has not been determined. Refer to the solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

80 Would BLM consider soliciting under NAICS Code 562910 where the small business size standard is 500 employees?

Refer to the solicitation publication(s) for the final determination

81 What is the small business goal? The goal is to maximize small business participation in this project. It was initially contemplated that all work in Phase I would be set aside for small businesses. However, set-asides/small business participation has not been determined. Refer to the final solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

82 When will small business set-asides be determined? Prior to solicitation release.

83 Would BLM consider a Small Business 8A set aside for Phase II work? Will HubZones be considered in the acquisition strategy?

All small business socioeconomic categories are being considered at this time. Refer to posted solicitation(s) for final determination.

84 For Phase I, would BLM consider incentives based upon a contractor accomplishing quantities of completion of sites per season?

Yes.

85 Would BLM consider merging Phase I and Phase II and awarding to the same company(ies)?

Refer to the final solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

86 If the pricing structure is Fixed Price, how would BLM compensate for non-productive bad weather days?

BLM acknowledges the likelihood of bad weather days during the winter season and will structure pricing accordingly.

87 How does BLM anticipate addressing contingencies?

While a singular, blanket contingency line item is not allowable, specific contingency line items can exist on contract; these should be reflected in proposals as contractors deem necessary.

88 Will these contracts be subject to Service Contract Act? If yes, how will you assure the right labor rates are cited?

BLM will consult with the Department of Labor prior to issuing any solicitation for this work to ensure compliance is required and any wage determinations are current and accurate.

89 If a potential contractor wants to maximize efficiencies in their proposal, how would they know what wells to propose first?

BLM is contemplating providing scenarios to which offerors would propose solutions.

90 Please explain what the “Mock Task Orders” will involve. BLM is not currently anticipating using Mock Task Orders for Phase I.

This would be a sample task included in the solicitation to which all offerors could propose their technical solution and associated pricing based on the same set of circumstances.

91 Is BLM set on the schedule outlined in the Statement of Objectives and presentation?

No; BLM may alter, delay or cancel release of contemplated solicitation(s) to assure that quality services can commence in the most cost-effective manner.

92 Would BLM consider site visits to sites in the summer in order to be able to respond to RFP for Phase II?

Possibly, land use authorization from the BLM is required for any summer site visits. Refer to posted solicitation(s) for final determination.

Questions pertaining to potential source selection 93 Will you consider past experience as a team or in a teaming arrangement, or will this be evaluated for each prime?

Consideration of past experience and past performance will be determined when the solicitation is posted. Refer to the solicitation

94 How will teaming and project resourcing be evaluated during source selection.

Evaluation criteria are currently being developed. Refer to the solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

95 How will local hiring be factored into the proposal evaluation or selection process?

This is currently under consideration. Refer to the solicitation(s) for the final determination

96 How will local resource use plans be addressed? Has BLM considered the fact that certain Burroughs permits stipulate that a certain percentage of community involvement be required?

It is anticipated that local resource use plans will be required in the proposal stage and will be part of the permitting process. BLM is considering that Offerors will have to address socioeconomic goals illustrating community involvement both in terms of actual laborers and impact to community businesses. Refer to the solicitation

97 Will you consider oral presentations during source selection? Refer to the solicitation publication(s) for the final determination.

98 What are you looking for in a contractor? Can you expand on the evaluation criteria presented? What is critical to BLM when reviewing proposals?

The evaluation factors listed in the Legacy Well Industry Day presentation are those that have been contemplated to date. Refer to the solicitation(s) for the final determination of evaluation criteria.

99 If a company is already mobilized in an area near a legacy well, will BLM consider the aspect of ‘shared infrastructure’ in making a contract award?

Possibly. BLM would consider the aspect of shared infrastructure if the offeror clearly demonstrated how BLM would benefit in technical aspects and pricing.

100 Can this shared infrastructure methodology trump the idea of a ‘priority’ well?

Possibly. BLM wants to utilize the most cost effective approach and maximize public funding appropriated for this purpose.

Other Questions 101 Will the attendance roster from the Industry Day presentation be available?

Yes. It will be posted with the presentation and questions and answers from Industry Day.

102 What is the role of the Army Corps of Engineers going forward? The Corps of Engineers is currently working on Plugging & Abandonment plans for Umiat #3. Their ongoing involvement has not yet been determined.

103 Does BLM anticipate the Alaska Department of Law being involved in this project?

Unknown at this time; BLM will research.

104 Do you anticipate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) will be involved?

For each well site where on-the-ground work is necessary, the permitting process to obtain a land-use authorization from the BLM will involve consultation with the USFWS on listed species.

105 How will ADEC be involved?

ADEC will be working in concert with BLM to ensure the contamination detection and remediation is compliant with both State and Federal Requirements. Refer to the information presented in the Industry Day Presentation for details.

106 Is the representative from the Alaska Department of Environmental

Conservation that presented information during Industry Day a representative from the ADEC Fairbanks office?

Yes. John Carnahan is the ADEC representative who presented during Industry Day. Mr. Carnahan works out of the ADEC Fairbanks office.

107 Once a contract is in place, will John Carnahan be the point of contact for the Contractor to coordinate with ADEC?

108 Has BLM confirmed that ADEC has the resources and work force to review and approve work plans and reports in a timely manner to maintain the proposed project schedule? Is ADEC committed to a specific turn-around time for their reviews and responses? What happens if they exceed this timeline?

Both the BLM and ADEC are committed to ensuring the success of the Legacy Well program. ADEC is working collaboratively with BLM, prioritizing this project and committing staff to provide timely attention.

109 Will ADEC be onsite for final audits? Unknown, although BLM does not anticipate this for all Legacy Wells at this time.

110 How/when is AOGCC involved? The BLM and AOGCC will work together to review and concur with the Plugging & Abandonment designs and completion work. The AOGCC will provide the contractor with sundry approval for both the 10-403 and 10-407 forms.

111 During the Industry Day presentation, AOGCC expressed their understanding about the history of these wells and stated they would be flexible in their approval of remediation plans and close-outs. Is this “flexibility” going to be defined into set parameters for the contractors?

Given the vintage and variability of each site, it is unlikely that there will be set parameters for the contractor at the initial bid, and they will instead be defined at the task order or site work plan level. Of note, AOGCC has reviewed these wells in a public forum and the results of their downhole analysis are available upon request to Computer Matrix Court Reporters

112 Which current regulations will contractors be held to? The regulations will vary for each Phase and Stage of work. Refer to the solicitation publication(s) for pertinent regulation requirements.

113 Are there other agencies involved? The term ‘Pre-Condition Items’ within the Statement of Objectives (SOO) and presentation attempts to encompass all agencies and entities that could be involved throughout the lifespan of the overall Plugging and Abandonment effort fulfillment.

http://www.computermatrixcourtreporters.com/contact.html http://www.computermatrixcourtreporters.com/contact.html

114 Will BLM be primarily responsible for negotiations with ADEC and/or other project stakeholders; or would those elements be part of the scope of work implemented by the selected contractor?

BLM will be responsible for communicating with the ADEC and AOGCC directly. The contractor may be involved in discussions or meetings that occur with all parties in order for there to be effective communication regarding expectations.

Acronym Key ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

AOGCC Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

BLM Bureau of Land Management

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

DOI Department of Interior

FWS Fish & Wildlife Service

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NPRA National Petroleum Reserve Alaska

P&A Plug & Abandon

SOO Statement of Objectives

USACOE United States Army Corps of Engineers