JIATF 401 CSO_Final_26FEB26.docx

Joint Interagency Task Force (JIATF) 401 Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO)

1. General Information

The JIATF 401 was established to synchronize Counter-small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS) efforts across the Department of War (DoW) and the broader interagency community. The proliferation of sUAS technology presents a rapidly evolving threat landscape, requiring a coordinated and adaptable approach to detecting, tracking, identifying, and defeating threats posed by malicious or unauthorized sUAS operations. JIATF 401 serves as the central hub for integrating C-sUAS activities, promoting information sharing, and driving innovation in this critical domain. To effectively counter the growing sUAS threat, JIATF 401 requires advanced capabilities that can seamlessly integrate data from diverse sensors, provide real-time threat assessments, and enable coordinated responses.

1.1 Notification:

Authorized under DFARS Subpart 212-70, this CSO enables the DoW and Interagency Partners to competitively procure solutions through a streamlined acquisition process, allowing for rapid award decisions. This approach underscores our mission to expedite the award and delivery of critical technologies, ensuring that JIATF 401 can leverage advancements in manufacturing swiftly and efficiently. By prioritizing speed in our contracting efforts, we aim to support the timely integration of cutting-edge technologies that enhance operational readiness.

Contracts or agreements awarded under this authority will be structured as fixed-price, including fixed-price incentive fee contracts. Through this initiative, JIATF 401 reaffirms its commitment to fostering innovation and enhancing manufacturing operations, ultimately delivering superior capabilities to our warfighters.

1.2 CSO Procedure:

JIATF 401 seeks to award the following, but is not limited to: FAR contracts under FAR Part 12, Commercial Procedures; or non-FAR agreements such as transaction agreements under 10 U.S.C 4022; and Cooperative Agreements under 31 U.S.C. 6305 for JIATF 401 and/or partners within the DoW or Interagency that are directly relevant to enhancing the effectiveness of developing, implementing, and advancing cutting-edge technology and strategies to defeat Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) threats from adversaries at home and abroad.

This CSO may result in awards to proposals for commercial products, commercial services, and non-developmental items through multi-phased, competitive processes through 31 December 2028. The Government reserves the right to extend this CSO beyond the “open until” date by amendment if the authority is extended. This CSO may include awards for, but are not limited to, commercially available technologies immediately available, commercially available technologies fueled by commercial or strategic investment, concept demonstrations, pilots, and agile development activities that can incrementally improve commercial technologies, existing government- owned capabilities, or concepts for broad defense application.

In accordance with the statutory discretion under 10 U.S.C 4022, for a non-FAR agreement regarding the use of competitive procedures to award a follow-on production effort, if multiple prototype solutions are determined to be successful, the Government reserves the right to either pursue a production effort with only one successful solution, or to solicit proposals from successful offerors for the purpose of selecting one or more solutions for a follow-on production contract or transaction.

The CSO solicitation process may include a multi-phased solicitation and evaluation approach that is dependent upon specific Areas of Interest (AoIs). The AoIs are focused topic(s)/categories specified in Section 6.1. The following phases may be used:

Phase 1 – Submission of written solution brief, Phase 2 – Presentation (if applicable), and Phase 3 – Request for Commercial Solution Proposal (Request for CSP)

The Government may add AoIs against this CSO with or without closing dates at any time throughout its duration. Interested companies are encouraged to frequently check www.SAM.gov for new AoI postings.

The CSO outlines the procedures that are available for utilization by the Government for AoIs to ensure a competitive process is followed. The competitive process under this CSO may result in a one, two, or three phase approach (written solution brief, presentation (if applicable), and a request for CSP proposal):

Phase 1 Solution Briefs: A solution brief must be submitted as specified in Section 3.2.1 of this CSO. The Government will evaluate solution briefs against the criteria stated in this CSO. The Government will not pay companies for the costs associated with solution brief submissions.

Phase 2 Presentations (if applicable): Companies whose solution briefs are evaluated to be of merit may be invited to provide a Presentation following the instructions provided in Section 3.3 of this CSO. In the event that the Government requires a Demonstration in addition to a Presentation, additional information will be provided in the specific AoI highlighting those procedures; otherwise, Phase 2 will be comprised solely of the Presentation. The Government reserves the right to request additional technical information to determine if a company has a viable solution for the government’s specific AoI. The Government will not pay companies for costs associated with Presentations, unless otherwise stipulated.

Phase 3 Request for Commercial Solution Proposal (Request for CSP): Those companies that are evaluated to be of merit through Phase 1 or Phase 2 or a combination of both, may be invited to submit a full written proposal following the instructions provided in Section 3.4 of this CSO.

Requests for a CSP under this CSO are subject to the availability of Government funds. The Government will not pay companies for costs associated with developing submissions in regard to this CSO or resulting AoI, unless otherwise stipulated within the AoI.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to forgo Phase 1 and Phase 2 based on the individual merits. The Government also reserves the right to move expeditiously through the phases based on the merit of submissions if urgent requirements arise.

NOTE: Entities may elect to forgo Phase 1 and Phase 2 and submit a written proposal, however, due to Government budget uncertainties, no specific dollars have been reserved for awards under this CSO. The participating agencies will provide no funding for direct reimbursement of white paper or proposal development costs.

NOTE: During any step of the CSO, the Government may send written questions or comments for the offerors to address via email, or other suitable communication methods as determined by the Government.

NOTE: The Government may engage in discussions with companies during any phase of the process including development of the formal proposal phase.

2. Definitions

1. “Area of Interest” (AoI) means an announcement posted on the Government Point of Entry (GPE) website, which may result in the award of various types of contracts that will be dependent on the specific AoI requirement.

2. “Commercial Solutions Opening” (CSO) is a competitive procedure contracting officers may use to acquire commercial products, commercial services, or non-developmental items through a competitive selection of proposals resulting from a general solicitation and the peer review, technical review, or operational review (as appropriate) of such proposals.

3. Commercial Solution Proposal (CSP): is a commercial proposal that is submitted in response to an AoI that is governed by a CSO. CSPs may be requested as a result of solution briefs and/or presentations/presentations.

4. “Nontraditional Defense Contractor” is defined in 10 U.S.C. § 3014 as an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for a least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the DoD for the procurement or transaction, any contract or subcontract for the DoD that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 1502 and the regulations implementing such section. This includes all small business concerns under the criteria and size standards in 13 C.F.R. § 121.

5. “Nonprofit Institution” as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 3703 as an organization owned and operated exclusively for scientific or educational purposes, no part of the net earnings of which ensures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

6. “Small Business Concerns” is defined in the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C 632).

3. Guidelines for Solution Briefs, Presentations, and Proposals

3.1 General Guidelines

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or proposals are not desired.

When applicable, use of a diagram(s) or figure(s) to depict the essence of the proposed solution is strongly encouraged.

Companies may submit multiple solution briefs in response to any single AoI if each submission represents a separate and distinct concept. Individual solution briefs may only address one concept based on the stated AoI.

Specific period of performance or delivery requirements will be indicated in the AoI.

Technical data with military application may require approval, authorization, or license for lawful exportation.

All solution briefs, presentations, and proposals must be unclassified. If there is a need for a classified submission, request additional instructions from the JIATF CSO inbox (usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.jiatf401cso@army.mil). Do NOT mark any documents as “CONFIDENTIAL”. Solution briefs, presentations, and proposals containing data that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose or use by the Government except for evaluation purposes shall include the following general disclaimer on the cover page:

“This [select one: solution brief, Presentation, or Proposal] includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the government, except to non-government personnel for evaluation purposes, and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed - in whole or in part - for any purpose other than to evaluate this submission. If, however, an agreement is awarded to this company as a result of - or in connection with - the submission of this data, the government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent agreed upon by both parties in the resulting agreement. This restriction does not limit the government's right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]”

Recommend marking (header or footer) for portions of business plans and/or technical information that are to be protected for a period of five years from FOIA disclosure. Codified at 5 U.S.C. §552, FOIA provides that disclosure of certain types of information (i.e. trade secrets and commercial or financial information) is not required, and may not be compelled, for five years after the date on which the information is received by the Department of War.

NOTE: Foreign-Owned businesses may independently submit a solution or do so as part of a teaming arrangement with one or more United States-owned businesses. The ability to obtain an agreement based upon a submission may depend upon the ability of the Foreign-Owned business to obtain necessary clearances and approvals to obtain proscribed information.

Questions regarding the objectives or preparation of the solution brief should be addressed to the Points of Contact (POCs) listed in the respective AoI.

Submissions must be submitted electronically.

Entities submitting solution briefs that are not chosen for the presentation phase or the CSP phase will be notified in writing as soon as practicable. Further verbal feedback may be provided, upon request, at the Contracting/Agreements Officer’s discretion.

3.2 Phase 1 Solution Brief:

3.2.1 Phase 1 Solution Brief Content:

Unless otherwise stated on the subject AoI, solution briefs shall not exceed five single-sided written pages using 12-point font.

Solution briefs must include the following:

1. Company Name, Title, Date, Point of Contact Name, E-Mail Address, Phone, and Address. Specifically identify the AoI for which the solution brief is submitted.

2. Executive Summary: Provide an executive summary of the technology or service. (This is included in the five written pages limit).

3. Technology Concept: Show and/or describe how your proposed solution or potential new capabilities represent an application of innovative commercial products, innovative commercial technologies and services or adaptations/modifications of existing commercial product technologies and services to the AoI. Describe the unique aspects of your technology and the proposed work as it relates to the AoI. Identify whether the effort includes the pilot or demonstration of existing commercial technology (identified as commercially ready and viable technology), or the development of technology for potential defense applications. If development or adaptation is proposed, identify a suggested path to mature the technology. Identify aspects of your proposal, to include date and software, which may be considered proprietary.

4. Price: Provide a rough order of magnitude price for the proposed solution and include desired payment terms.

NOTE: The title page does not count against page limit, however, the executive summary does.

3.2.2 Phase 1 Solution Brief Basis of Evaluation:

Individual solution briefs will be evaluated against the evaluation criteria described below:

1. Responsiveness of the solution brief in addressing the AoI with a commercially available product and/or process readily available to meet the immediate needs;

2. The technical merit of the proposed solution, including the extent to which the proposed solution is unique, and/or innovative to government application; and

3. The affordability of the proposed solution.

Solution briefs will be evaluated based on the evaluation criteria listed above, not against other solution briefs submitted in response to the same AoI. Additional technical evaluation criteria specific to a particular project may be used. In these instances, the additional criteria will be posted within or as an attachment to the AoI on the GPE website. Based on the results of the Phase I evaluation, the Government may elect to invite “all, some or none” of the proposed solutions into Phase 2 Presentations or directly into Phase 3 by requesting a CSP.

3.2.3 Phase 1 Solution Brief Submission:

Solutions briefs should be emailed to the points of contact listed under applicable area of interest.

NOTE: Additional points of contact may be defined for areas of interest that include closing dates.

3.3 Phase 2 Presentation (if applicable):

3.3.1 Phase 2 Presentation Content:

If invited into Phase 2, companies must provide a Presentation to demonstrate and provide further details on the technical and business viability of their proposed solution. In addition to the Presentation, the Government may request an additional written submission to supplement or clarify the information provided in the Phase 1 solution brief. Depending on the specific requirement, the Government may request an in- person, virtual or paper demonstration. The Government may, at its sole discretion, conduct a site visit to verify the offeror's stated capabilities. In the event that the Government requires a demonstration, additional information will be provided in the specific AoI highlighting those procedures. During the Phase 2 Presentation, the company shall address the following in detail:

1. A description or demonstration of how the proposed solution represents an innovative application of commercial technology to the AoI.

2. A rough order of magnitude (ROM) price and notional schedule.

3. Any Intellectual Property (IP) involved in the effort and associated restrictions on the government’s use of that IP.

4. Additional information/detail from the company’s Phase 1 solution brief, as specified in the government’s invitation to Phase 2.

3.3.2 Phase 2 Presentation Basis of Evaluation:

Individual presentations will be evaluated against the evaluation criteria below and not against any other presentations held under the same AoI. Unless otherwise indicated in the AoI, presentation submissions shall be valid for a minimum of 120 days after notification of presentation evaluation as described below.

After completing the evaluation of presentation submissions, the Government will notify the company of one of the following:

1. Request a CSP for evaluation in Phase 3;

2. The proposed solution is not of continued interest to the Government and will not be considered for a CSP Phase 3 for the instant requirement (*see note below), or

3. The proposed solution is of continued interest to the Government but is not currently eligible for an invitation to Phase 3 CSP submission due to the current lack of Government resources and/or funding.

NOTE: Based on results of Phase 1 and/or 2 submissions, additional Government offices may be interested in having offerors move into Phase 3.

Presentations will be evaluated/scored on the following factors, as provided in the AoI:

1. Level of relevancy of the solution in addressing the AoI with a commercially available product or process;

2. The technical merit of the proposed solution adequately addressed the AoI need(s) and demonstrated feasibility for the Government to pursue the proposed solution;

3. Level of uniqueness, or innovative approach to solve the Government’s need;

4. Level of technical risk or maturity;

5. Level of risk placed with the proposed ROM;

6. Level of risk in the proposed milestone schedule and its ability to meet the AoI need within a relevant time period;

7. Level of risk in the company’s viability and business solution; and

8. Level of potential risk in anticipated IP and data rights assertions

3.4 Phase 3 Proposal:

The third and final Phase of the CSO process is the CSP. Through Request for CSP, offeror(s) will be invited to submit a CSP based on the defined CSO phased approach that will be utilized, which may revise or include information learned from Phase 1 or 2 reviews. Offerors must ensure that the CSP is valid for at least 180 days from the submission date. If necessary, offerors invited to submit a CSP may be advised to schedule a meeting with the Government to address any feedback contained in the request for CSP. The CSP must be prepared in two separate Volumes as follows: Volume I Technical and Volume II Price. Each volume will have its separate related attachments.

3.4.1 Phase 3 Proposal Content

Based upon Government market knowledge, the results of Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 evaluation(s) above, the Government may Request a CSP. If that occurs, a company or companies will be invited to develop and submit a written proposal. The company may propose terms and conditions including but not limited to Service License Agreements (SLA) and/or User License Agreements (ULA) governing the requirement for the Government’s consideration and negotiation. At this stage, the selected companies may discuss proposal development details during the proposal writing process with their assigned Government expert(s) or Government teaming partner(s).

Companies should note that there are certain terms and conditions the Government may be unable to accept. However, projects awarded through the CSO may provide flexibility to adopt customary industry standards where it is otherwise legal and meets the Government’s general public responsibility.

Proposals containing data that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes shall include the following sentences on the cover page:

“This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government, except to non-government personnel for evaluation purposes, and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed -- in whole or in part -- for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, an agreement is awarded to this Company as a result of -- or in connection with -- the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent agreed upon by both parties in the resulting agreement.

This restriction does not limit the Government's right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]”

Each restricted data sheet should be marked as follows:

“Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title Page of this proposal.”

3.4.1.1 Section 1 Technical Proposal Volume:

The technical volume shall include a detailed work plan indicating how each aspect of the objectives is to be accomplished. The technical volume should be in as much detail as the offeror considers necessary to fully explain its proposed technical approach or method, including all assumptions utilized to develop its proposed solution and associated costs. The technical volume should reflect a clear understanding of the nature of the work being undertaken. The technical volume must include information on how the project will be organized, staffed, and managed. Information should be provided that demonstrates the offeror’s understanding and management of important events or tasks. The technical volume must include a list of suggested deliverables and deliverable dates.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to further define the required technical proposal content based upon the specific AoI requirements.

3.4.1.2 Section 2 Price Proposal Volume:

The price volume must contain sufficient information to allow the government to perform a basic analysis of the proposed cost or price of the work. If the proposal includes a time and materials contract line item, the proposal must include labor categories and corresponding number of direct labor hours; fixed hourly rates that include wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, and profit; and costs for materials, supported by vendor quotes, supplier agreements or other bases of estimate. The Government reserves the right to request any other price data or supporting cost information the Government deems necessary to determine whether the total overall price is fair and reasonable. This can include but is not limited to commercial price catalog(s), previous commercial sales receipts, and/or other proprietary information to help the Government determine reasonableness and future budgetary cost estimates.

NOTE: The cost of preparing proposals in response to this CSO is NOT considered a direct charge to any resulting AoI award or any other contract.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to further define the required price proposal content based upon the specific AoI requirements.

3.4.2 Proposal Basis of Evaluation:

Proposals will be reviewed as received by a Government subject matter expert(s). In all cases, proprietary information shall be protected from competitors. The CSO will be evaluated in the order described below. The Government subject matter expert(s) will first review the proposal for adequacy and eligibility to determine the extent to which the following requirements are met:

1. The merit and risk elements of the proposed technical approach are acceptable and address the priorities outlined in the AoIs;

2. The proposal performance schedule is realistic and/or adequate; and,

3. The proposed price is affordable.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to further define the basis for evaluation based upon the specific AoI requirements.

3.4.3 Proposal Evaluation Rating:

1. The Technical Proposal Volume will be evaluated and assigned to one of the following ratings:

a. Acceptable: The proposal has been evaluated and deemed appropriate for additional consideration and discussion. An acceptable proposal is generally considered well-conceived, scientifically or technically sound, and important to program goals and objectives. An acceptable proposal may proceed into negotiations or directly to the award process.

NOTE: An acceptable rating does not guarantee contract award. The following will be taken into consideration: program priorities, outcome of negotiations, and availability of funds.

b. Unacceptable: The proposal has been evaluated and deemed inappropriate for additional consideration. An unacceptable proposal is generally considered not well-conceived, scientifically or technically unsound or does not meet program priorities. An unacceptable proposal will be rejected.

2. The Price Proposal Volume will be evaluated as follows:

a. Affordability: The proposed costs must also be affordable to the Government in order to be considered for award. A fair and reasonable price determination will not be made for each CSP if multiple offerors are invited to Phase 3 and does not guarantee contract award. The technical merit will dictate the level of scrutiny required for a price analysis. The following will be taken into consideration: program priorities, technical review, and availability of funds. A fair and reasonable determination will only be made for an offeror being selected for an award.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to negotiate directly with the company on the terms and conditions prior to execution of the resulting contract or agreement, including payment terms, and will execute the contract or agreement on behalf of the Government.

3.4.4 Proposals may be emailed directly to the Contracting Officer/ Agreements Officer, stated in the specific Area of Interest.

4. Awards

4.1 General Guidelines

Upon favorable review and funds availability, the government may choose to make a fixed price award using FAR Part 12 Acquisition of Commercial Items or other authority such as 10 U.S.C. 4022.

In order to receive an award –

1. A company must have a Unique Entity ID (UEI) and shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to receiving an award. Companies are advised to commence SAM registration upon perusing an AoI announcement.

2. A company must also register in the prescribed government invoicing system (ex. Wide Area Work Flow).

3. A company must be determined to be responsible by the Contracting Officer and must not be suspended or debarred from award by the Federal Government nor be prohibited by Presidential Executive Order and/or law from receiving an award.

4. Receipt of a request for CSP does not guarantee that a company will receive an award and the Government reserves the right, at any point prior to award of a contract or agreement, to cancel the Request for CSP. The Government reserves the right to make awards to all, some, or none of the selected solutions.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to amend this CSO solicitation as necessary amendments for emerging requirements and changes in authority occur. Amendments to this CSO will be posted via SAM.gov.

4.2 Procurement Integrity Act (PIA)

The CSO solicitation process for FAR contracts is covered by the Procurement Integrity Act (PIA). PIA is implemented for FAR contracts through FAR part 3.104. Accordingly, the CSO competitive solicitation process and awards made thereby must adhere to the ethical standards required by the PIA.

5. Contact Information:

JIATF 401 CSO POC: David J. DiRoma at david.j.diroma.civ@army.mil JIATF 401 CSO POC: Megan Schuster at megan.l.schuster.civ@army.mil JIATF 401 CSO POC: SFC Art Dominguez at Arthur.j.dominguez2.mil@army.mil

6. Areas of Interest (AoI)

Capability Management Office – Mobile (CMO-M)

General AoI 26-001: CMO-M oversees acquisition of JIATF 401 activities that focus on providing mobile and on-the-move C-sUAS capability to the Joint and Interagency community. Focus areas include defense of the U.S. Southern Border, National Security Special Events (NSSE), foreign technical capability transfer, and emerging requirements from the Services and Combatant Commands. Solutions should focus on rapidly transportable and emplaceable systems that can stand-alone or augment a layered fixed-site defense system.

AoI 26-001 White paper submissions will be accepted until otherwise stated.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.jiatf401cso@army.mil

ATTENTION: Technical Point of Contact: LTC Alexander Morse

Direct AoI 26-004 Task Force East:

JIATF 401 is currently seeking a comprehensive, integrated solution that provides a layered defense through both fixed-site and mobile C-sUAS capabilities. Offerors shall propose a single, integrated solution to equip four (4) fixed-site zones and six (6) mobile Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV) platforms. Solutions shall be no longer than five (5) pages in length. Offerors shall include a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) assessment of delivery capacity for the proposed solution. This ROM should, at a minimum, state the estimated number of units that can be delivered and the delivery timeline. Proposed solutions with expeditated timelines may be considered as part of any follow-on integration AOI.

Each of the four fixed-site kits shall be comprised of a suite of sensors and effectors that includes each of the capabilities listed in Attachment 001 – Task Force East Requirements.

Each of the six ISV kits shall be comprised of a suite of sensors and effectors that includes each of the capabilities listed in Attachment 001 – Task Force East Requirements.

Suspense date for submittal under AOI 26-004 is COB 06 March 2026.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.jiatf401cso@army.mil

Technical Points of Contact: MAJ Cole Price (cole.s.price.mil@army.mil) LTC Alexander Morse (alexander.h.morse.mil@army.mil)

Capability Management Office – Fixed Site (CMO-FS)

General AoI 26-002: CMO-FS oversees acquisition of JIATF 401 activities that focus on providing fixed site C-sUAS capability to the Joint and Interagency community. Focus areas include Replicator 2 and emerging requirements from the Services and Combatant Commands for fixed site capability. CMO-FS is also responsible for the JIATF 401 C-sUAS Marketplace, which enables stakeholders to acquire C-sUAS equipment in an expedient manner.

AoI 26-002 White paper submissions will be accepted until otherwise stated.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.jiatf401cso@army.mil

ATTENTION: Technical Point of Contact: MAJ Jermaine Jordan

Capability Management Office - Command and Control (CMO-C2)

General AoI 26-003: CMO-C2 oversees JIATF 401's efforts to steer the DoW and the whole of government toward commonality in the C-UAS mission space. The office's focus is the identification and integration of solutions that create a seamless and interoperable C2 ecosystem for diverse stakeholders.

CMO-C2's responsibilities extend to both end-to-end C2 systems and the underlying technologies that enable broad integration. Key areas of technological interest include platform-agnostic integration layers, universal data models for C-UAS, decision support and automation, operator interface and user experience, and innovative approaches to sensor fusion and cross-domain information sharing. The principal objective is to break down existing stovepipes and enhance collective situational awareness and response capabilities.

AoI 26-003 White paper submissions will be accepted until otherwise stated.

All communications, including proposal information shall be sent to: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.jiatf401cso@army.mil

ATTENTION: Technical Point of Contact: MAJ Alex Dobson

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.