JA DVS SAN SpycerNode System - Redacted.pdf
PDF 210 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DVS SAN SpycerNode System
- Solicitation number
- 2025-LGR-0183
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This is a Justification and Approval (J&A) document for other than full and open competition for factory certified maintenance of a DVS SAN SpycerNode System at the Library of Congress National Audiovisual Conservation Center (NAVCC). The contract will be awarded to DVS c/o DVS/Rohde & Schwarz for a period of performance from March 2, 2025 through March 1, 2029.
The justification for limiting competition is based on the specialized nature of the equipment and proprietary software, with Rohde & Schwarz being the only manufacturer capable of providing software support for the system. The DVS SpycerNode SAN System, purchased in June 2024 under contract LCLGR24P0010, provides file storage services for the NAVCC Film Lab and interfaces with existing infrastructure. The Library's audio-visual preservation specialists will monitor industry developments to determine if other vendors become authorized by R&S in the future to provide maintenance services, at which point future contracts would be opened to full and open bidding. The contract value falls under the simplified acquisition threshold of $250,000.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Justification and Approval For Other than Full and Open Competition
Plan ID Number:
Form Updated 4/14/2023
Justification & Approval
As a legislative branch agency, the Library is subject to the competition and advertising requirements of 41 U.S.C. § 6101. Like the Competition in Contracting Act and the FAR, 41 U.S.C. § 6101 does not require competition when a contracting officer certifies that only one source or brand-name item is available, when dictated by public exigency, or when otherwise authorized by law.
This document sets forth the justification and approval for award of a contract or order by means providing for other than full and open competition per 41 U.S.C. § 6101, LCR 7-210, and, as applicable, FAR 6.302, FAR 13.106-1, FAR 8.405, and FAR 16.505. Contracting without competition shall not be justified on the basis of a lack of advance planning or concerns related to availability of funds.
This form shall be used to support instances where competition will be limited to a single source, a limited number of sources, including where a brand name product is required.
Part 1 – Identification
1. Contracting Agency and Activity: Library of Congress, LCSG/RCS/NAVCC/PSS
2. Nature of Action Being Approved
Contract (or modification) LoC or Leg Branch Order (or modification) GSA Schedule or GWAC: Identify Schedule/Contract Other: Identify
Plan ID Number: 2025-LGR-0146 Contractor (or Brand Name): DVS c/o DVS/Rohde & Schwarz Estimated Value (Base and all options):
Period of Performance: 03/02/2025 thru 03/01/2029
3. Description of Supplies or Services Required to Meet Library Needs
Describe the supplies or services that are required to meet the Library’s minimum needs and the delivery schedule required to meet those needs. Do not focus on a description of the program.
The Library requires the following supplies or services: The Library of Congress NAVCC needs factory certified maintenance for its DVS SAN SpycerNode System that was purchased by Rohde & Schwarz in June 2024 under contract LCLGR24P0010.
Part 2 – Program Office Justification & Approval
4. Authority for Contracting Without Competition Over $250,000 For this requirement over $250,000, under FAR part 6, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
There is only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy Library requirements.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C); FAR 6.302-1.
Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. FAR 6.302-1(b)(1).
Source controls copyrights, patents, raw materials, or secret processes cannot be acquired otherwise, or similar circumstances. FAR 6.302-
1(b)(2).
Other exception identified in FAR 6.302-1: Identify the exception
There is such unusual & compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured if competition is not limited.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B); FAR 6.302-2. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute (e.g., AbilityOne, UNICOR, GPO, GSA Public Buildings Service, Appropriations Act, etc.) per 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 6.302-5: Identify the authority
Other basis authorized in 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b) or FAR part 6.302: Identify the exception Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. FAR 6.302-1(c).
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
IT Standard Data Sheet)
Up to and including $250,000 For this requirement up to $250,000, using simplified acquisition procedures under FAR part 13, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
Only one responsible source is reasonably available to meet Library requirements. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b); FAR 13.106-1.
Product or service is reasonably available from only one source.
Source controls copyrights, patents or other exclusive licensing arrangements.
Urgent circumstances; only one source can reasonably deliver by required date. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute: Identify the authority Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product The Product is listed the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
IT Standard Data Sheet)
GSA Schedule Order For this GSA schedule order under FAR part 8, the basis for not competing among GSA schedule-holders and/or specifying a brand name product or item is:
An urgent and compelling need exists, and following GSA procedures would result in unacceptable delays.
FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A).
Only one GSA source is capable of fulfilling the requirement at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B).
In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original order that was placed competitively among GSA schedule-holders (i.e., the original order was not sole-source or limited-source.) FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C).
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
Order Under Multiple Award Indefinite-Delivery Contract or GWAC For this order under FAR subpart 16.5, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
The need is so urgent fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR
16.505(b)(2)(i)(B).
A logical follow-on order in the interest of economy and efficiency. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(i)(2)(C).
To satisfy a minimum guarantee. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(D).
Authorized or required by statute. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(E).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. 41
U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B) and FAR 16.505(a)(4)(i).
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
5. Rationale for Contracting Without Competition
In supporting an action not providing for full and open competition, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the contractor is exceptionally well qualified or even the best qualified, or that the required brand name product is well suited to the Library’s needs.
The rationale must demonstrate that no one else, or no other competing product, can satisfactorily fulfill the Library’s requirement.
Do not focus on the importance of the requirement; the issue is the rationale for not competing.
In supporting urgency, address the following: What are the unexpected facts or the unpredictable events that led to this situation?
When is the required delivery or performance start date? Why this date? What specific harm to the Government will occur if the delivery is not made or performance not begun as scheduled? (Note that expiration of funds is not sufficient harm to justify not competing.) Demonstrate that the contract is only for items and quantities urgently needed until a competitive procurement action can be developed, or that a separate competitive follow-on is not practical.
In supporting a brand name justification, the brand name or feature must be essential to the Library’s requirements, and market research indicates that other company’s similar products or products with similar features cannot meet or be modified to meet the Library’s needs.
We are authorized to limit competition on the basis of the citation in section 4 because: This contract is for factory authorized maintenance of specialized equipment known as the DVS SpycerNode SAN System. This system consists of hardware and proprietary software. No company other than the manufacturer, Rohde & Schwarz, can be expected to provide software support on proprietary software. The purpose of this system is to provide file storage services for the Film Lab at the NAVCC. The system is designed to interface with existing infrastructure. Maintenance service for this equipment is provided by the factory.
6. Actions to Overcome Barriers to Competition Before Subsequent Contract Is Required
State what actions, if any, the program office can take to overcome barriers to competition before a contracting for this requirement again, such as: using action to provide time to develop specifications for a competitive procurement by a certain date; licensing copyrights or patents so other contractors may use the works; or breaking the requirement into parts that may be purchased competitively. If this is a one-time requirement, explain that action to increase future competition is not needed. If the source is expressly required by statute, state “Source is statutory.”
To increase competition, we will: The expert audio-visual preservation specialists at the NAVCC will monitor industry developments to determine if any other vendors are authorized by R&S in the future to provide this type of maintenance. If that occurs the Library will open future contracts to full and open bidding.
7. Program Office Certification
I certify that the description of the Government’s minimum needs, schedule requirements, and technical information that provide the basis for this justification are accurate and complete.
BPART 3 – CONTRACTING OFFICER DETERMINATIONS & CERTIFICATION
Robinson, James Digitally signed by Robinson, James Date: 2024.11.26 12:39:32 -05'00'
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .