JA 24-11-Final Signed_Redacted.pdf
PDF 120 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N62473-21-D-1202-N6247322F1631
About this file
This justification and approval document authorizes a sole source procurement of specific brand name facility related control system network equipment from Distech in the amount of $117,926 to replace the recruit mess hall at Marine Corps Recruitment Depot San Diego. The network equipment models listed, including routers, switches, field controllers and temperature sensors, must be purchased due to compatibility with the installation-wide control system infrastructure and to meet cybersecurity requirements for the system's authority to operate accreditation from Naval Facilities Engineering Command Headquarters. While other manufacturers offer comparable products, only the stated Distech models meet test and configuration requirements for the existing certified system into which the new mess hall network must integrate.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SOUTHWEST
750 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190
J&A No. 24-11
JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL
FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
PROPRIETARY PRODUCT AUTHORITY FOR
FACILITY RELATED CONTROL SYSTEM NETWORK EQUIPMENTFOR P315 RECRUIT
MESS HALL REPLACEMENT
MARINE CORPS RECRUITMENT DEPOT SAN DIEGO, CA
1. Contracting Activity
Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Southwest (NAVFAC SW), San Diego, California.
2. Description of Action being Approved
This project-specific Justification and Approval (J&A) authorizes and approves the procurement of the only brand-name Facility Related Control System (FRCS) network equipment from Distech that complies with the Marine Corps Recruitment Depot (MCRD) cybersecurity requirements for project P-315 Mess Hall Replacement at Marine Corps Recruitment Depot San Diego.. The approval applies to brand-name equipment that is tested/inspected/maintained/sustained by Utilities and Energy Management Public Works at MCRD. The estimated P315 MESS HALL project cost for the equipment collectively is $117,926. This amount is only a nominal percentage, approximately of the overall cost for the project (currently estimated at ).
3. Description of Supplies/Services
The following specific brand name products are required for FRCS networking
Description Part Number Cost/Unit Qt y Subtotal
DISTECH JACE
NETWORK ROUTER
CDIDI-BOS8NOWIFI EC-
BOS-8
$ 2,625 1 $ 2,625
DISTECH SOFTWARE
CORE 1
SDITR-NC-8025 EC-BOS-8, $ 1,630 1 $ 1,630
5 PORT NETWORK
SWITCH
EISK5-GT 5 PORT NETWORK
SWITCH
$ 150 1 $ 150
DISTECH FIELD
CONTROLLER 18PT
ECB 350 $ 1,220 25 $ 30,500
DISTECH FIELD
CONTROLLER 24PT
ECB 650 $ 3,000 21 $ 63,000
DISTECH NETWORK T-
STAT
ROOM TEMPERATURE
SENSOR
$ 250 35 $ 8,750
DISTECH VAV
CONTROLLER
W/DAMPER AFS
ECB-VAVS $ 663 17 $ 11,271
Total $ 117,926
4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition
The statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition is 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1) as implemented by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.302-1. Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.
5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Statutory Authority
Project P315 requires specific network equipment to allow the newly provided FRCS system to tie into the existing MCRD network that hosts the Installation-wide FRCS infrastructure utilized for monitoring, billing, and recording of data for energy management and control. The specified brand name products are required to be purchased in order to be compatible with the pending NAVFAC FRCS Authority to Operate (ATO) accreditation required. The FRCS network at MCRD is installed in conjunction with NAVFAC Headquarters (HQ). NAVFAC HQ holds Platform Information Technology (PIT) certification for FRCS. ATO certification is achieved through a rigorous Risk Management Framework process in accordance with Unified Facilities Criteria 4-010-06 Cybersecurity of Facility Related Control Systems to reduce and mitigate vulnerabilities until the risk is acceptable to the System Owner and Authorizing Official. While there are other manufacturers of comparable materials, the specific brand-name equipment listed above are the exact models that are required in order to be in compliance with the existing accreditation process.
The aforementioned brand/make/models of network equipment are the only ones tested and currently installed. DoD Instruction 8500.01 requires that all PIT systems have their cybersecurity controls documented and validated prior to operation and/or deployment.
The use of the brand name components that have been previously included in the current Energy Monitor and Control System avoids significant costs and delays associated with obtaining a new certification for additional network equipment which, due to government information technology cybersecurity risks, is required when additional nonconforming hardware or software is added to the system with resultant changes in the security posture of the system. The process of obtaining a new ATO would unacceptably delay the operational use for the affected facility and connection of the facility to the existing networks, resulting in a significant degradation in accomplishment of mission.
6. Description of Efforts Made to Solicit Offers from as Many Offerors as Practicable
The specific brand-name products are required, but the products can be purchased from more than one distributor and multiple resellers of these items exist. These products are commercial-off-the-shelf and should be available for purchase through any vendor. In accordance with FAR 6.302-1, the approved J&A will be posted on SAM.GOV at the time of solicitation.
7. Determination of Fair and Reasonable Cost
Based on the historic cost information currently available, the Contracting Officer has adequate information to ensure that the cost to the Government for this acquisition will be fair and reasonable.
8. Actions Taken to Remove Barriers to Competition
Currently, there is no other brand-name equipment available that meets the requirements of the impending accreditation for the FRCS Network. NAVFAC HQ is continuously evaluating new commercial hardware to increase brand diversity and may add new brand/make/models to the ATO accreditation as soon as alternatives become available.
CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL
TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION
I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this Justification and its supporting acquisition planning documents, except as noted herein are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Technical Cognizance:
JOHN COON Phone No. Date Chief Engineer Planning, Design and Construction Director
NAVFAC SW
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW
I have determined this Justification is legally sufficient.
DEANA JAEGER Phone No. Date Associate Counsel
APPROVING OFFICIAL
WARRANTED CONTRACTING OFFICER
I certify that this Justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Upon the basis of the above justification, I hereby approve, the solicitation of the proposed procurement(s) described herein using other than full and open competition, pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1) (FAR 6.302-1).
SHEENA HESS Phone No. Date Contracting Officer Planning, Design and Construction Core – Marine Corps
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .