J.1 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 108 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TUNISIA PORT and LZ DD TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 95332420R0001
- Issued by
- Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity issued by the Millennium Challenge Corporation. The past performance questionnaire is a template to collect ratings and commentary on a contractor's prior work on contracts such as ability to control costs, adhere to schedules, meet performance and quality standards, exhibit cooperative business relations, and ensure personnel qualifications. The related federal contract opportunity is soliciting proposals for Tunisia Port and LZ DD Technical Support Services, with a proposal due date of May 20, 2020. The solicitation number is 95332420R0001 and will be conducted according to FAR Parts 12 and 15. Questions regarding the solicitation must be submitted by April 29, 2020 and proposals should cite the primary solicitation number and be sent to the specified Contract Specialist.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 06 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 95332420R0001_AMENDMENT 0001.pdf | ||
| J.2 DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES FORM SFLLL.pdf | ||
| 95332420R0001 - RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Tunisia Port and LZ DD Technical Support Services
95332420R0001
SOLICITATION:
OFFEROR NAME:
TITLE/ROLE:
EMAIL:
PHONE:
AGENCY:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
CONTRACT #:
TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
PRIME OR SUB?:
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED:
RATING CATEGORIES:
RATING CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
Very Good VG
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements.
The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory S Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal M
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unacceptable U
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable NA Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
95332420Q0015
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price.
Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
VG S M U NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems?
Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
[Enter Name of Reference] Date
| DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED: |
| VG: Off |
| S: Off |
| M: Off |
| U: Off |
| NA: Off |
| Supporting Narrative: |
| VG_2: Off |
| S_2: Off |
| M_2: Off |
| U_2: Off |
| NA_2: Off |
| Supporting Narrative_2: |
| VG_3: Off |
| S_3: Off |
| M_3: Off |
| U_3: Off |
| NA_3: Off |
| Supporting Narrative_3: |
| VG_4: Off |
| S_4: Off |
| M_4: Off |
| U_4: Off |
| NA_4: Off |
| Supporting Narrative_4: |
| VG_5: Off |
| S_5: Off |
| M_5: Off |
| U_5: Off |
| NA_5: Off |
| Supporting Narrative_5: |
| VG_6: Off |
| S_6: Off |
| M_6: Off |
| U_6: Off |
| NA_6: Off |
| Supporting Narrative_6: |
| VG_7: Off |
| S_7: Off |
| M_7: Off |
| U_7: Off |
| NA_7: Off |
| Supporting Narrative_7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| Text1: |
| NAME OF RESOURCE: |
| DATE: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .