J.1 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 108 KB Posted

Attached to
TUNISIA PORT and LZ DD TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
95332420R0001
Issued by
Millennium Challenge Corporation

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity issued by the Millennium Challenge Corporation. The past performance questionnaire is a template to collect ratings and commentary on a contractor's prior work on contracts such as ability to control costs, adhere to schedules, meet performance and quality standards, exhibit cooperative business relations, and ensure personnel qualifications. The related federal contract opportunity is soliciting proposals for Tunisia Port and LZ DD Technical Support Services, with a proposal due date of May 20, 2020. The solicitation number is 95332420R0001 and will be conducted according to FAR Parts 12 and 15. Questions regarding the solicitation must be submitted by April 29, 2020 and proposals should cite the primary solicitation number and be sent to the specified Contract Specialist.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to TUNISIA PORT and LZ DD TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, newest first.
File Type Posted
06 - Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
95332420R0001_AMENDMENT 0001.pdf PDF
J.2 DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES FORM SFLLL.pdf PDF
95332420R0001 - RFP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Tunisia Port and LZ DD Technical Support Services

95332420R0001

SOLICITATION:

OFFEROR NAME:

TITLE/ROLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

AGENCY:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

CONTRACT #:

TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

PRIME OR SUB?:

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED:

RATING CATEGORIES:

RATING CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

Very Good VG

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements.

The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Satisfactory S Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal M

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unacceptable U

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable NA Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

95332420Q0015

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:

Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.

(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price.

Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).

VG S M U NA

Supporting Narrative:

(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?

(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.

(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?

(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems?

Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.

(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.

(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.

(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.

(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?

CERTIFICATION:

I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.

[Enter Name of Reference] Date

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED:
VG: Off
S: Off
M: Off
U: Off
NA: Off
Supporting Narrative:
VG_2: Off
S_2: Off
M_2: Off
U_2: Off
NA_2: Off
Supporting Narrative_2:
VG_3: Off
S_3: Off
M_3: Off
U_3: Off
NA_3: Off
Supporting Narrative_3:
VG_4: Off
S_4: Off
M_4: Off
U_4: Off
NA_4: Off
Supporting Narrative_4:
VG_5: Off
S_5: Off
M_5: Off
U_5: Off
NA_5: Off
Supporting Narrative_5:
VG_6: Off
S_6: Off
M_6: Off
U_6: Off
NA_6: Off
Supporting Narrative_6:
VG_7: Off
S_7: Off
M_7: Off
U_7: Off
NA_7: Off
Supporting Narrative_7:
8:
9:
10:
Text1:
NAME OF RESOURCE:
DATE:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .