J.1.b.7 - ARTS Past Performance Relevancy Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NASA Ames Research Center - Request for Proposal - Aerospace Research Technology and Simulations (ARTS)
- Solicitation number
- 80ARC024R0002
About this file
This document contains two attachments related to a solicitation for the Aerospace Research, Technology and Simulations (ARTS) program.
Attachment J.1(b)7 includes two matrices - a Past Performance Relevancy Matrix and a PWS Requirements Matrix. The Past Performance Relevancy Matrix requires offerors to identify which past performance references are relevant to each Performance Work Statement requirement. The PWS Requirements Matrix requires offerors to specify the percentage of each PWS requirement that will be performed by the prime contractor and any major subcontractors. This attachment appears to be a template for offerors to complete with their proposed breakdown of work.
The related solicitation is number 80ARC024R0002 issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center. It seeks to provide engineering services to operate, maintain and upgrade simulation and software facilities at NASA ARC and Langley Research Center in support of aeronautics and technology objectives. The period of performance and response dates are not specified. This opportunity is for the Aerospace Research, Technology and Simulations program previously described in sources sought and draft solicitation notices.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposed PWS Matrix
| Proposed Allocation of PWS Requirements by Team Member | |||||||
| State Percentage of Requirements Proposed to be Performed on this Contract for the Offeror and its Major Subcontractor(s) | |||||||
| PWS | |||||||
| Section | PWS | ||||||
| Description | (Insert Company Name of Prime Offeror) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #1, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #2, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #3, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #4, if proposed) | Total | |
| 4.2.1 | Management/ | ||||||
| Administration | 0% | ||||||
| 4.3.3 | Software Development | 0% | |||||
| 4.3.4 | Systems Administration | 0% | |||||
| 4.3.5 | Aerospace Engineering and Applications Programming | 0% | |||||
| 4.3.6 | Graphics Programming | 0% | |||||
| 4.3.7 | Simulator Hardware and Mechanical Systems Engineering | 0% | |||||
| 4.3.7.1 | Maintenance | 0% |
Instructions to Offerors:
The Offeror (Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed) must complete this PWS Requirements Matrix to state its proposed approach for which PWS requirements for this contract will be performed by the Prime Contractor, and its Major Subcontractors, if proposed. For each PWS Section above, state the percentage of work the Prime Contractor and each of its Major Subcontractors, if proposed, will perform on this contract. The percentages assigned to the Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed, should sum to 100% for each PWS Section in Column H. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is less than 100% in Column H then the Government will conclude that the remaining percentage of work will be performed by the Offeror's subcontracts that do not meet the criteria to classify as a Major Subcontractor. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is greater than 100% in Column H then the Government will reduce the percentage of work to be performed for that PWS Section for the Prime and each Major Subcontractor by the average percentage over 100% (i.e., (Proposed percentage over 100%/total prime and major subcontracts = amount each prime and major subcontractor proposed to perform). Enter numbers in the green fields only. The template will automatically sum the inputs. The Offeror may add additional columns between current Column E and F if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.
Examples to Offeror to Demonstrate How to Provide Inputs in Matrix:
Example 1 (1 Prime/1 Sub): Prime Contractor is proposed to perform all the work for Section 4.2.1 Management/Administration. Enter "100" in cell D4 and "0" in cells E4 through H4. Cell I4 will display "100%". Example 2 (1 Prime/2 Major Subs): Major Subs are proposed to perform all the work for PWS Section 4.3.7 Simulator Hardware and Mechanical equally. Enter "0" in cell D9, "50" in cell E9, "50" in cell F9, and "0" in cell G9 and H9. Cell H9 will display "100%". Please verify that inputs accurately reflect your proposed breakdown of PWS work before submitting the completed Matrix with the Offerors proposal.
RFP Past Performance Relevancy Matrix 80ARC024R0002 Attachment J.1(b)7
Past Performance Ref Matrix
| Proposed Relevance of Past Performance Contract References in Relations to the Contract PWS Requirements by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontractors) | ||||||||
| Identify which PWS Requirements from this Contract were Performed on Each Past Performance Reference by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontractors) | ||||||||
| Performed as a Prime or Subfactor on Past Performance Contract Reference | PWS Section 4.2.1 Management/Administration | PWS Section 4.3.3 Software Development | PWS Section 4.3.4 Systems Administration | PWS Section 4.3.5 Aerospace Engineering and Applications Programming | PWS Section 4.3.6 Graphics Programming | PWS Section 4.3.7 Simulator Hardware and Mechanical Systems Engineering | PWS Section 4.3.7.1 Maintenance | |
| Prime Offeror Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #1 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #2 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #3 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #4 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
Instructions to Offerors:
Offerors shall complete this past performance contract reference proposed relevancy matrix. In Column A, for each individual past performance contract reference, provide the name of the Prime Contractor or Major Subcontractor the past performance contract reference applies to. Also, include the contract number and contract name for each past performance contract reference. In Column B, include a “P” or “S” to indicate whether the Prime Offeror or its Major Subcontractor(s) was a Prime Contractor or a Subcontractor for that particular past performance contract reference. For all remaining columns, state an “X” in each column where the individual past performance contract reference included similar experience to the requirements in PWS Section identified in Row 3 of Columns B-L. The Offeror may add additional rows after row 23 if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.
&"Times New Roman,Regular"&10RFP &"Times New Roman,Regular"&10Past Performance Relevancy Matrix &"Times New Roman,Regular"&10 80ARC024R0002 Attachment J.1(b)7
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .