J - 13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 413 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS GUADALUPE (T-AO 200) MTA
Solicitation number
N3220521R4126
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template to be used for evaluation of contractors. The Military Sealift Command is soliciting offers for a contract to provide supplies and services for the USNS GUADALUPE (T-AO 200) FY21 Mid Term Availability. Respondents are to be evaluated on factors including quality of previous products or services, timeliness of deliveries, business relations, and staffing qualifications. References listed by respondents will be sent this questionnaire to provide ratings and comments on the contractor's past performance in these areas. Completed questionnaires must be returned before January 24th, 2022 to be considered in MSC's contractor assessment.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N3220521R4126-0002.docx DOCX document
0514_A_PUMP OVERHAUL.doc DOC document
N3220521R4126 Conform Copy.docx DOCX document
J-2 CAT A Items Rev 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220521R4126-0001.docx DOCX document
J-2 CAT A Items Rev 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL SWI-0011.pdf PDF
J - 14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure (NDA).pdf PDF
J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0015.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0013.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-004.pdf PDF
J-4 USNS GUADALUPE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-2 CAT A Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL SWI-001.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0014.pdf PDF
J-3 Category B Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL SWI-0024.pdf PDF
Attachment J-5 Subcontracting Plan Assessment Checklist.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0010.pdf PDF
J-12 Past Performance Data.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0016.pdf PDF
JA GUAD MTA 2021 Final_redacted.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0020.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0022.pdf PDF
J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.pdf PDF
J-8 Request for Clarification.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0018.pdf PDF
N3220521R4126.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0021.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-005.pdf PDF
J-11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0019.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0017.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-006.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0012.pdf PDF
J-10 Interport Differential.pdf PDF
CDRL SWI-0023.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.

____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (24 January at 1300 hours, 2:00 PM EST) to Robert Vance. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Robert Vance at Robert.vance1@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, Robert Vance Contract Specialist

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service:

Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors):

Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes No Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .