ITB 24_018 Addendum 2.pdf
PDF 146 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 24-018 Sandy Springs Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Plan Action Plan Traffic Counts
- Solicitation number
- PE-66098-NONST-2024-000000003
- Issued by
- Fulton County, Georgia
About this file
This document is Addendum Number 2 to Invitation to Bid (ITB) #24-018 issued by the City of Sandy Springs, Georgia for a Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan Traffic Counts project. The addendum provides answers to questions received from prospective bidders, including clarification that speed data is not required as a deliverable and that cameras can be used instead of traffic tubes to record the required 48-hour traffic volume counts. The addendum also confirms that a performance bond is not required, and the City's evaluation will be based on compliance with the bidding instructions as well as the provided references and cost. The bid due date has been updated from October 13, 2023 to October 19, 2023 at 2:00 p.m.
The City currently does not have a vendor under contract for the required traffic counts, and there are no incumbent pricing details to share. Bidders can use either traffic tubes or cameras to perform the volume-only counts, as speed and vehicle classification data are not required. The City is not interested in the vendor conducting near-miss analysis as part of this effort.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ITB 24_018 Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| ITB 24_018.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum Number 2
ITB #24-018 Sandy Springs Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan Traffic Counts
COMPLETE THIS ADDENDUM, SIGN and SUBMIT with the ITB
DUE DATE: October 19, 2:00 p.m.
To All Prospective Offerors: In reference to the RPF listed above, the following answers to questions, additions, deletions and changes are hereby incorporated into the RFP
Q1. Is speed data required as a deliverable? If not, is it permissible to use cameras to record the required traffic volumes instead of tubes?
Answer: No, speed data is not required as a deliverable. It is permissible to use cameras to record the required traffic volumes instead of tubes.
Q2. Reading through this I see where is say Daily Volume Counts. I would like to confirm that these are
48 hour volume counts. These do not require class or speed. Just Volume.
Answer: Yes, these are 48-hour volume counts. These do not require class or speed. Only volume.
Q3. On page 2 of the Bid Form, a performance bond is mentioned. Is a performance bond required for submission?
What is the amount of the performance bond?
Answer: The performance bond is not a requirement of this solicitation.
Q4. What is the City's evaluation criteria for this ITB?
Answer: Compliance with the bidding instructions on page 6. In addition to providing references and cost.
Q5. Does the City have an estimated Intent to award date?
Answer: The City does not have an estimated Intent to Award date.
Q6. Does the City currently have a vendor for traffic counts?
Answer: See response to question #7.
Q7. If the City has a current contract for traffic counts, can you share the Incumbent and their current pricing?
Answer: There are no vendors currently contracted with the City.
Q8. Can the selected vendor use cameras in place of tubes? Given that these are approach counts, tubes don't provide very reliable data when so close to each intersection. It's that much more problematic when the intersections have high ADTs.
Answer: Counts can be made using tubes or cameras.
Q9. Can you please confirm that these are all volume only, and that speed/classing is not required? If classing is required, what is the desired scheme?
Answer: These are volume only counts. Speed and class are not required.
Q10. Would you all be interested in performing near miss analysis for each intersection as part of this effort? This is something we can pilot if we perform the counts at each intersection for 48 hour periods.
Answer: No.
Q11. Will the minutes from the pre-bid conference be posted or sent out?
Answer: A plan holders is provided in the public files.
Q12. On page 7 of the ITB, in the bottom paragraph, it says, "The Bidder will be required to sign a
"Notice of Intent" (NOI) as the "operator" prior to beginning landscaping services.
Please clarify that "landscaping services" should be "traffic count services."
Answer: "Landscaping services" should be "traffic count services."
*UPDATE*
The due date is being updated from October 13, 2023 to October 19, 2023 at 2:00 p.m.
Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/8146434147?pwd=enE0QWhqUVJQYlJvdlVRZjdtQmorQT09
Meeting ID: 814 643 4147
Passcode: K6qKVp
+13017158592,,8146434147#,,,,*495973# US (Washington DC)
+13126266799,,8146434147#,,,,*495973# US (Chicago)
Passcode: 495973 https://zoom.us/j/8146434147?pwd=enE0QWhqUVJQYlJvdlVRZjdtQmorQT09
I hereby acknowledge receipt of Addendum Number 2 for #24-018 Sandy Springs Safe Street and Roads
All Safety Plan Action Plan Traffic Counts and have incorporated the changes into my response for the above mentioned ITB.
COMPANY NAME:
CONTACT PERSON:
ADDRESS:
CITY: _________________________________STATE: ___________ ZIP: ________________________
PHONE: ________________ FAX: _______________
EMAIL ADDRESS: ______________________________________
SIGNATURE: ____________________________________________
DATE: ______________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .