SAME Guam Post Industry Day Presentation Meeting Notes.pdf

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corporation 6100 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, KS 66211

P +1 913 458-3020 E TaberLH@bv.com

Recorded on: 22 August 2024 Subject: SAME Guam Post Industry Day Presentation Meeting Notes

An Industry Day meeting was held by the Society of American Military Engineer’s Guam Post (SAME

Guam Post), which included a presentation given by representatives of the US Government (USG) and

Architect/Engineer Joint Venture Jacobs/Black & Veatch (JV). The topic of the presentation was an overview of a planned project on Andersen Air Force Base titled “P-693 Guam Defense System Command

Center.” The Guam Defense System (GDS) is an announced program by the Department of Defense and the proposed project is one component of this program. Following Guam Post announcements and other

Post business, the presentation started. See presentation slides for additional information.

In summary fashion, the following occurred or was discussed:

• Presentation portion of the meeting started at 0938.

• Mr. Doug Grant, P.E., with the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), spoke first after introductions.

• Goal of the presentation is to increase awareness of the potential project and provide some information on upcoming procurement opportunities.

• The entire presentation is predicated on the fact this project is not yet final and the determination to construct or not a Command Center facility is pending completion of the Enhanced Integrated

Air and Missile Defense (EIAMD) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision

(ROD) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

• An overview of MDA’s mission and purpose was provided.

• There is a lot of coordination ongoing across different stakeholders and locations on the island.

• An overview of MDA’s requirements process was provided. These requirements drive the project and means a greater amount of involvement throughout the project lifecycle by stakeholders.

• An overview of the Command Center requirements and general characteristics was provided.

o The facility must always be reliable and ready to fulfill its mission.

o The importance of the facility is equal to a hospital or other emergency facility. This drives resilience and reliability requirements which includes redundancy of systems.

o Design factors result from both environmental and manmade events.

o Facility size is about 57,000 sf with occupancy of approximately 158 persons.

• Command Center key requirements were shown.

o The Command Center itself will be seismically base isolated.

o It is a Risk Category IV Essential Facility.

o Equipment will need to be seismically certified. This requirement will be reviewed and verified closely by the Government to ensure it is met.

o Corrosion resistance due to the tropical environment is important and has driven several of the material choices on the project. Stainless steel on exterior and hot-dipped galvanized on the interior are typically required.

o Electromagnetic Interference protection and Anti-Terrorism Force Protection measures are included on the project.

o Some portions of the facility must meet ICD 705 security requirements.

o The facility serves as a designated storm shelter and must meet ICC 500 requirements for seismic and typhoon events.

• The Power Generation facility was then discussed.

o Facility primary power is provided by 13.8 kV overhead line from nearby substation.

o Emergency power provided by several generators which must seamlessly transition.

Backup power must be reliable to meet resiliency requirements.

o To allow the transition of power, a sophisticated control system is planned.

o Fuel storage capacity is needed for an extended period of time.

o Power facility, including generators, are protected against ballistic and windborne debris with walls all around.

o The Power facility, unlike the Command Center, is not seismically base isolated. The full seismic effects of a Maximum Credible Earthquake several times the force of gravity will need to be resisted by the equipment, including the generators. This will impact the equipment seismic certification.

• Schedule considerations are very important.

o The Government is considering including incentives into the contract but is not decided.

o There is an expectation that hazardous materials will be encountered in existing housing demolition; this will require schedule sequencing to meet the environmental considerations. GEPA permitting by contractor is expected to be time critical.

o It is expected several pieces of equipment will require long lead times. This includes the generators, switchgear, and other electrical components plus some mechanical equipment like chillers.

o About 5,000 sf of facility must be constructed in accordance with ICD 705 security provisions, which can take longer and can drive management and physical security provisions.

o Experience has shown that seismic compliance can take extra time, particularly seismic certification. Typically, a contractor needs expert experience to meet the requirements.

o Because this project is part of a larger program and other entities will be involved on the project site, the contractor is part of a larger team. There are planned contractual coordination requirements. Partners include other projects on the island as well as mission systems contractors.

o Joint Occupancy is a schedule requirement and means the site will be shared with mission systems contractors. The Joint Occupancy Dates (JODs) are important in the project schedule. These allow the installation and testing of the mission equipment.

• The audience was invited to ask questions of Mr. Grant’s portion of the presentation; no questions were asked.

• SAME Guam Post reminded the audience the presentation would be made available.

• Following other SAME Guam Post business, Captain Troy Brown, P.E., NAVFAC Marianas

Commanding Officer, was next to speak.

• A disclaimer indicating the views presented are those of the speakers was made. This applies for the entire presentation.

• In opening remarks, CAPT Brown thanked the industry partners in the room for attending and emphasized understanding projected workflow was important.

• A program overview for the Guam Defense System was presented including both an MDA program and an Army program with multiple sites.

o Proposed action eventually aims to have a 360-degree EIAMD system including command and control, radars, sensors, launchers, interceptors.

o Additional infrastructure support facilities will also be needed, including barracks, vehicle maintenance, and administration facilities.

• A notional sand chart displaying workload on Guam was displayed showing extensive growth with the GDS program laid on top of other projects already programmed for the island. Work is expected to be approximately double by FY27 from FY24.

o It was noted this is delivery dates, not funding dates; thus, this would represent work being performed and invoiced.

o The peak workload is expected in FY27.

o There is a heavy build-up planned through FY26, including the Army program.

o The “other” work category on the chart does not include all the Typhoon Mahwar recovery efforts.

• The number one priority for the Indo-Pacific Command is the GDS program.

• Questions were invited for CAPT Brown:

o Question: A lot of work is planned and being performed for a relatively small island location; is it expected that non-island workers will be required to meet manpower needs.

This will be more expensive. Has this increased labor cost been considered?

Answer: The number of H2B visas granted have doubled recently and a lot of effort has been made on this issue. It is hoped contractors can find the manpower needed and develop lodging solutions, etc as needed. Future legislative action is needed to continue to meet labor needs. Currently, the limiting factor appears to be funding instead of labor.

o Question: Follow-up to prior question is if the cost estimates have considered the labor issue to limit disconnects with project bids versus estimates?

Answer: It is understood. Contractors need longer known validity periods for H2B visas to support amortization of costs to build up this manpower.

o No additional questions were asked. CAPT Brown invited the dialogue to continue in these forums.

• Mr. Pat Carolan, Vice President with Black & Veatch Federal Business, was introduced to present additional details of the proposed facility. Some topics were repeated from Mr. Grant’s presentation to add emphasis.

• The audience was reminded that all information presented is not final. The actual solicitation will be the basis for bid. Items being shown in the presentation are to highlight general characteristics, unique, and important items. The facility is not traditional construction in many aspects.

• The project is located on Andersen Air Force Base (AAFB), with North Gate access.

• The facility is a Risk Category IV and is seismically base isolated horizontally.

• Contractor schedule performance is an important aspect of the project.

• Because this is a requirements-based design, as Mr. Grant indicated, it is important to pay attention to the plans and specifications. The requirements will be checked and verified.

• The overall site was presented, and key points highlighted. Several houses are to be demolished as part of the work and the site is about 17 acres. Some houses are planned to remain.

• The contractor scope includes relocation of pesticide impacted soil (PIS). The soil will be relocated within the site.

• The houses are expected to contain lead, asbestos, PCB, mercury, etc which will require off-island disposal due to no approved on-island disposal options.

• A more detailed site layout was presented, and various proposed features were shown. This includes a command center, power plant with fuel storage, 150 ft tall steel framed RF antenna tower, access control point, fuel unloading, retention basins, parking, etc. A future warehouse location will be used for secure storage during construction.

• There is about 45 ft of vertical elevation difference north to south across the site.

• While water and sewer connections are available near the site, electrical power will be obtained from the AAFB substation using existing spare conduit. A drawing showing the potential route was shown and terminations discussed. This power will feed an A-side and B-side bus as part of the redundancy required for the project.

• Various 3D renderings of the project were shown, including a north and a south view.

• Included in the renderings is a security fence enclosing the site. The infrastructure for the electronic security will be provided by the contractor, however the devices will be procured and installed by others.

• The self-supported RF tower is planned to be 150 ft tall and will be designed by the contractor as a delegated design. The antennas and cabling will be provided by others. Additionally, there will be antennas provided by others on the roof of the facility that will be accessed using a contractor-built catwalk and stair tower. Mounting posts and brackets on the roof are contractor provided.

• The laydown area is currently shown to be about 1/4 mile away from the main site except for the secure storage area. The laydown area is about three acres in size and is split into three sections.

One will be used by mission systems contractors, one by the USG, and the final largest section by the contractor. The contractor will provide trailers for Government use within the contractor’s space. The secure storage area will be used for materials that need to be controlled prior to installation in accordance with the Construction Security Plan (see specifications).

• It was emphasized there will be extensive US Government involvement on the project, including in the secure laydown space.

• A notional floor plan of the facility was shown with approximate space allocations. The facility includes an open-air mechanical bay, equipment spaces, mission systems spaces, and office spaces. The entire facility is designed for open storage in accordance with DoD Manual 5200.01

Volume 3. There is also a smaller space designed for, and to be constructed to, ICD 705. The entire facility is seismically base isolated, and the primary construction uses precast concrete.

• In a cross section of the facility, some general building elements were shown:

o A concrete mat foundation supports the seismic isolators on pedestals in a low-ceiling unoccupied crawl space.

o The first floor consists of cast-in-place beams, precast prestressed double-tees, and a topping slab.

o The structural walls are precast concrete, both exterior and interior.

o The roof system is concrete double-tees plus topping slab. It has a higher roof section in the middle of the facility.

• Because the precast elements are important to the facility, some general details and isometric renderings were shown. As stated, the roof, floors, and walls consist of precast elements. Other architectural elements including gutters, stairs, and canopy planks are also precast concrete. The wall panels are thicker with more congested reinforcement than traditional panels. Penetrations will need to be coordinated closely by the contractor within all precast concrete. The wall panels are joined using a wet-joint plus base dowel system, which is also congested. Because of the upper roof long double tee spans and tall inner walls, it is expected crane capacity will need investigated for on-island availability or sourced from off-island. The members are heavier than traditional similar elements. Construction sequencing will be critical.

• As indicated, the planned Command Center is a Risk Category IV Essential facility and is seismically base isolated. The seismic isolators sit on concrete pedestals within the space under the facility with large deformation capability.

• As a Risk Category IV facility, there are several designated seismic systems that will require seismic certification. This is an important aspect of the project. Experience has shown that the contractor will need structural engineers who are experienced in this type of work and often this is a subcontractor. Seismic certification requires early focus on the task, especially on long-lead items, to meet project schedules. While the isolation system reduces the forces on the facility, the certification process is still the same and takes time. Not only must the equipment meet the specified technical function, but it must also meet the seismic requirements. This means some equipment manufacturers will not be able to meet all requirements or have only tested certain models of their equipment lineup. There are some organizations which preapprove and maintain databases which manufacturers submit their certifications to. HCAI (formerly OSHPD) in

California is one of the more popular organizations. This can help with seismic certification, but the process is still required to prove the requirements are met. Current UFC standards, referenced in the project specifications, provide lists of items which must be included in the submittals.

• The distributed conveyance systems, such as piping, conduit, cable tray, ductwork, etc, have the supports seismically designed by the AE DOR, except for near the equipment. Because the exact equipment and tie-in points are not yet known, the final run into equipment is a delegated design to the contractor. This will require a structural engineer to perform bracing and anchorage calculations and corresponding submittals. This is another reason selecting specific equipment for long-lead items and large equipment is critical early in the project.

• The seismic base isolation system is sole sourced to Bridgestone and the contractor will need to procure and work with them for the specified system. A photo of a similar installed system was shown including the isolator sitting on a concrete pedestal. Sequencing is important.

• Cast-in-place concrete construction for the proposed project consists of large mat foundations, large beams, topping slabs, etc. The concrete mixture design will be specialized because of strength, shrinkage, and thermal-control (mass concrete) aspects. Due to the reinforcement congestion, self-consolidating concrete is also required.

• Because of tight tolerances in the seismic isolator bearing system, tight shrinkage limitations are specified. This will drive sequencing and long-term shoring and bracing of the concrete. The bearing tolerances were shown on the slide, they are 5mm horizonal displacement and 1:400 rotation and flatness. While the exact sequencing is mostly left to the contractor as means and methods, it is expected an inner core will need to be built first and then move outward. Full seismic isolator installation will not occur initially, and shoring will be left in place.

• As seismic is very important to the design, which was stressed again, the seismic design of non-structural components is also important. As previously discussed, the contract documents will include the routing, bracing and anchorage of primary distribution systems up to an interface point. Beyond the interface point, the design is delegated to the contractor. This includes the remaining routing, bracing and anchorage of the distribution systems as well as the selection, certification, bracing, and anchorage of the equipment. The design provides details to accommodate the large differential movement between the isolated structure at the facility perimeter where it interfaces with the non-isolated ground.

• Mechanically, the chiller water system was discussed. There are four chillers on the base-isolated first floor plus associated pumps, air handling units, computer room air conditioners, and recirculating air handlers. There is also a large buffer pipe in the mechanical yard to maintain a volume of chiller water in the event of a chiller outage.

• Fire suppression includes a wet pipe sprinkler system throughout most spaces plus a clean agent system in certain rooms.

• Beyond the potential Command Center, the backup power plant contains four 1,825 kW 13.8 kV

Tier 2 generators in a protected yard plus a switch gear building. The generators are planned to be self-contained enclosures. Within the approximately 4,100 SF switchgear building, medium voltage redundant switchgear is housed. Other features of the power plant include a 2,000 kW load bank mounted on a trailer (intended to support multiple locations) and a fuel system. The fuel system includes a fuel unloading area, storage, pumps, etc. It was noted there is an intermediate fuel tank for storage to meet storm shelter requirements. The perimeter precast concrete wind debris and ballistic rated walls include large stainless-steel louvers. Both an isometric and a plan view of the power plant plus a concept of the generator enclosure were shown. The fuel system was further detailed with an isometric, plan, and section views.

• An access control point was shown including an isometric view, plan view and section. It is a canopy covered turnstile and self-closing accessible gate. The covered area is about 870 SF.

• Because of the complexity of the systems on the project, several control systems are planned and were discussed. A fiber optic network is required for these systems. These include:

o Power Control and Monitoring System (PCMS) o Power Quality Monitoring System (PQMS) o Building Control System (BCS) o Advanced Metering Initiative (AMI) o Universal Control Console (UCC) – Console itself is Government provided, foundation by contractor. Contractor will also have interface with system.

• Cybersecurity requirements are important.

• A Construction Security Plan (CSP) will be implemented for certain areas of the Command Center plus site access control. This will impact what personnel are allowed to work in some areas of the facility, physical security of the site, and material acquisition plus transport limitations.

• While subject to change, the current expected solicitation schedule was shown. The draft solicitation has already been released with the official solicitation planned for Q1 of FY25. Award is planned for Q4 of FY25.

• This concluded the presentation portion, with questions following.

• Question: What is the contracting route for the mission systems?

o Answer: These systems are contracted through MDA out of Huntsville, AL. The mission systems contractors are already under contract.

• Question: What percent of the design is completed, and will it be a design-build project?

o Answer: The project design is currently close to 100% level. It is a design-bid-build (DBB) project, not design-build (DB). However, there are several elements of the project which are delegated design to the contractor, and many were discussed today. These include significant aspects of precast concrete elements, seismic certification, RF steel tower, mass concrete and mixture design, some final routing and bracing of distribution systems, smaller distribution systems, metal stair stringers and treads, plus other traditionally delegated items like concrete formwork design and crane lift plans.

• Question: Is the contractor required to have an AE firm involved?

o Answer: For the delegated design items, if the contractor does not have the design capabilities within their organization, it is expected subcontracting relationships will be needed. Items such as seismic and precast concrete typically are subcontractors.

• Question: Will the Environmental Impact Statement be included in the solicitation?

o If it is completed, it will be included. It may not be completed at that time.

• Question: Will the project have an allocated small business percent? Such as 8(a) or HUBZone?

o The small business allocation will be listed in the solicitation; it is unknown at this time.

• Following Q&A session, appreciation plaques and coins were presented.

• Meeting ended at 1120 local time.

SAME Guam Industry Day P693 Guam Defense System (GDS) Command Center

22 August 2024

NAVFAC Marianas

CAPT Troy M. Brown, P.E.

NAVFAC Marianas Commanding Officer Joint Region Marianas Regional Engineer

Although the subject matter of the following presentation deals with an ongoing or announced program by the Department of Defense, the views presented here are those of the speaker and DO NOT necessarily represent the views of the Department of the Navy, DoD or its components.

Reference: 5 CFR 3601.108

DISCLAIMER

•Proposed Action to deploy and operate a 360-degree EIAMD system to defend Guam against missile threats

•Operational facilities include command & control center, radars, sensors, launchers, and interceptor sites

•Support facilities include barracks, administrative, and vehicle maintenance facilities

•Potential location of work to occur to include NW Field, South Finegayan, Andersen AFB, Barrigada, Orote, Naval Magazine, etc.

Guam Defense System (GDS) Program •A determination of whether to construct a Command Center facility is pending completion of the final Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense (EIAMD) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Guam Military Construction Workload (Notional)

S.A.M.E. INDUSTRY DAY

Douglas E. Grant, P.E.

Real Property Investments and Deployments (MSR)

Missile Defense Agency

August 22, 2024

Note: A determination of whether to construct a Command Center facility is pending completion of the final Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense

(EIAMD) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision

(ROD) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Controlled by: Missile Defense Agency Controlled by: Mission Support (MDA/MS) Dissemination Control: Distribution Statement A:

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 24-MDA-11871 (15 Aug 24) POC: Doug Grant, MDA/MSR, (256) 450-2649

MDA Overview

• MDA Mission: Develop and deploy a layered

Missile Defense System to defend the United

States, its deployed forces, and allies from missile attacks in all phases of flight

• Coordinating deployment and operation of a

Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense system to defend the entirety of Guam against the rapidly evolving threats

• Integrating various system components, including a command and control center, radars, sensors, missile launchers, missile interceptors, and support facilities, at multiple sites around Guam

• Command Center Project will provide one of the first key components contributing to the

Guam Defense System (GDS)

MDA Requirements Process

• MDA must verify that the delivered facility meets the operational needs

• Command Center facility requirements were generated through a rigorous systems engineering process

• MDA traces all requirements between MDS Elements and facility construction projects

• MDA and NAVFAC jointly oversee facility construction to verify that requirements have been met

Operational

Needs

System

Specification

Element

Specifications

Facility

Requirements

Command Center Construction Project Overview

• The proposed Command Center is an essential facility necessary for post-disaster recovery and continuous operations after an earthquake

• Requires sophisticated control systems for power and cooling redundancy

• Power Generation Facility will provide a total of 7.3 MW of emergency backup power capacity via a switchgear building

• Total facility space includes ~57,000 square feet for computing equipment, user interfaces, communications, and mechanical cooling equipment with seating capacity for 158 personnel

• Project also includes security infrastructure, utilities & site improvements, cyber security measures, and demolition of housing units

Key Requirements

• Facility must be resilient to natural and induced environments

─ Facility is designed in accordance with ASCE 7-16 and UFC 3-

301-01 Risk Category IV

─ Command Center is supported on a seismically isolated foundation

─ Requires seismic certification of installed equipment

─ Must withstand typhoon wind speeds and windborne debris

─ Must utilize corrosion resistant materials suited for a tropical environment

─ Induced environments include electromagnetic interference and Antiterrorism/Force Protection

• Select areas of facility subject to construction security requirements in accordance with ICD 705

• Facility serves as a designated storm shelter subject to requirements set forth in the International Code Council

(ICC) 500

Power Generation Facility

• Primary power is supplied by local utility via a

13.8kV overhead line from nearby substation

• Power generation facility must provide emergency back-up power when commercial utility is not available

─ Seamless transition to and from generator power with no degradation to mission

─ Must have an uninterrupted power supply (UPS) system for graceful shutdown of critical equipment

─ Diesel Generators must have N+2 redundancy, diverse supply feeds, and housed in weather enclosures

─ Must have fuel storage capable of supporting mission for extended periods

─ Must provide ballistic protection from wind born debris

─ Fixed foundations (no base isolation)

Schedule Considerations

• Demolition of existing housing and utilities

• Environmental requirements

─ Waste Management Plan to be provided by contractor prior to start of work

─ Mitigation and disposal of asbestos, lead contaminated materials, PCB coatings, Mercury and Cadmium materials and pesticide contaminated soil

─ Hazardous waste requires disposal off-island

─ Must recycle or salvage 60% of nonhazardous construction debris and 100% of vegetative waste

• Equipment long lead times

• ~5,000 sq. ft. must be constructed in accordance with

ICD 705 security provisions

• Seismic Certification of Equipment and Anchorages

• Estimated completion timeline requires construction contractor to accommodate joint occupancy with mission equipment suppliers to allow for early equipment installation and testing

**Government Pursuing Contractual Incentives Linked to Timely Joint Occupancy**

Milestone Target Date

Draft Solicitation Aug 2004

Industry Day 22-23 Aug 2024

Release Solicitation Q4 2024

Guam Defense System P‐693 Proposed Command Center

Andersen AFB 22 August 2024

SAME Guam Post August Industry Day

GDS Command Center

Disclaimer

Information presented here represents design that is still under development and could change. The actual solicitation, when released, will be the basis for bidding and contract execution.

Questions will be addressed during Contractor Breakout Sessions or submitted via SAM.gov and provided to all in writing

Location

• Located on Andersen AFB, Guam

• North Gate Access

Site

Site

PIS Relocation Area

Command Center – Site Layout

• Command Center

• Power Plant

• RF Antenna Tower

• Security Fencing

• Parking and Roads

• Entry Control

• Fuel Storage and Unloading

• Bio‐retention basin

• Space for future Warehouse

Electrical Incoming Power Route

• New feeder via an existing conduit from AAFB Substation

• Terminations at a pad‐ mounted, four‐way sectionalizing cabinet as point of connection to power plant within boundary.

Command Center – North Side

8"Notional Representation"

Command Center – South Side & Power Plant

9"Notional Representation"

RF Tower

• 150‐ft tall steel framed

• Tower is delegated designed

• Self‐Supported

• Roof‐mounted Antennas

10"Notional Representation"

Laydown Areas

~1/4 Mile

Secure Storage Area

Laydown Area

Laydown Area

Secure Laydown Area

Command Center Overview ‐ Floor Plan A

Command Center Cross Section

• Prestressed tee roof and floors

• Wall panels

• Architectural elements

• Wet‐joint and grouted dowel connections

• Construction sequencing and crane capacity implications

Precast Concrete Elements

Seismically Base Isolated

Base Isolation System

Sectional View of Bridgestone HDR Isolator Unit

• Mass concrete – thermal control measures

• Heavily reinforced sections

• Self‐consolidating concrete probable

• Shrinkage limitations driven by isolator tolerances

• Long‐term shoring and placement sequencing

• Large embedded items

• Sloped precast topping slabs

Cast‐in‐Place Concrete Construction

Non‐Structural Components

• Design includes routing, bracing, and anchoring of select distribution systems

• Delegated design of most equipment and branch lines to the construction contractor via the specifications.

• Interface points are designated in the design where AE design ends and contractor’s begins

• Design provides details to show how distribution systems accommodate the CC’s isolated movement.

Command Center – Mechanical

Chilled Water (CHW) System

1. 4 Air cooled chillers are located on the base isolated mechanical pad.

2. 3 Chilled water pumps forward CHW to air handling units (AHUs), computer room air conditioners (CRACs), and recirculating air handlers (RAHs)in the CC.

3. Chilled water piping is routed and seismically braced to the bottom of the base isolated slab.

This allows the CHW pipe to move with the building in a seismic event and for CHW to be routed up through the floor to the units above.

4. A chilled water “buffer pipe” is sized to accommodate a chiller outage of 10 minutes, (5,500 gallons of CHW) to keep mission critical areas cool as the chillers reboot.

Fire Protection

Suppression Systems

• Wet‐pipe sprinkler system IAW UFC 3‐600‐01 and NFPA 13.

Supply via existing base water infrastructure.

(2) Overall sprinkler system zones in the CC.

(5) “Sub” zones (Battery Rooms and areas protected with clean agent) Light and Ordinary Hazard design criteria throughout.

• Clean Agent Systems Provided in certain rooms

• Fire Extinguishers Provided IAW NFPA 10 and a maximum travel distance of 75 feet.

Power Plant and Switchgear Building

Fuel Tanks

Generator Enclosures

Precast Concrete Ballistic & Wind

Walls

Conditioned Switchgear Building

Louvers

Power Plant and Switchgear Building

Power Plant – Generator Enclosure

Fuel System

Access Control Point

Access Control Point:

• 870 SF Covered Area

• Exterior concrete canopy‐ covered turnstiles and self closing accessible gate.

• Primary Function: Card reader‐controlled access point at perimeter fencing

• Power Control and Monitoring System (PCMS)

• Power Quality Monitoring System (PQMS)

• Building Control System (BCS)

• Advanced Metering Initiative (AMI)

• Universal Control Console (UCC) – Government Provided

Control Systems

Construction Security Plan (CSP)

• Requirements for personnel working in certain areas

• Physical security and controls requirements during construction

• Material Acquisition and transport requirements

Construction Security Plan

Solicitation Schedule

Milestone Target Date

Release Draft Solicitation August 2024

Industry Day 22‐23 August 2024

Release Solicitation Q1 FY25

Award Q4 FY25

• Ask during Contractor Breakout Sessions tomorrow

• Submit via SAM.gov

• Written responses will be posted to SAM.gov for all questions

Questions?